250 Watt Metal Halide 8/4/09
Hi,
<Hello Mike.>
I am currently planning a 54 G. mixed reef (primarily
SPS dominated). The dimensions of the tank are
38X27X22. Would a 250w Metal Halide unit be too much lighting for the
tank?
<Not for what you are wanting to keep.>
I planned on having the fixture set about 6" above the surface; the
highest point that I could place a coral in the tank would be about 10"
below the surface. Would a 150 or 175 unit be a better choice?
<No, I would stick with what you have here.>
Most of the reading I've been doing recommends 250-400 watts for sps.
Thanks,
Mike
<Welcome, Scott V.>
MH Lighting for a 180 Gallon Reef 1/8/09
Hello everyone,
<Hi Ryan, Scott V. with you. I added a bit more and resent this.>
As
always thanks for all of the help, your web site gets me through the
work day.
<Thank you, but through the work day!?!>
Well I just
upgrade my tank to 180 gallon AGA; I am going to be purchasing one of
those Vortech MP40 to increase my turnover since the overflows can't
handle my dolphin amp master at full throttle. So my question is about
lighting I have put in about 10 hours of reading on your sight and am
not sure of the path I should go. Realizing that lighting needs are
based on the inhabitants of the tank let me start with that. I have
polyps and soft corals, a couple of LPS corals as well. With the upgrade
from a 70 gallon tank to this 180 I want to get a few more things. Oh
ya, I have about 145 pounds of live rock, with a 1 inch aragonite floor
bed. I plan on laying out a single layer of live rock 3 to 4 inches high
on top of the 1 inch sand bed for the whole floor of the tank and then
have a wall of live rock going up the back wall of the tank.
<Sounds
nice.>
I would like to try my hand at SPS corals but the majority of
my stock will be LPS, Soft Corals, and Polyps. So with that I was
thinking of going with 3 MH, ICE CAP ballasts and pendants and getting
Ushio 14K bulbs. I figure 3 of these will work great, but do I go with
175W or 250W MH. Is there going to be that much of a difference?
<There is...depending on placement of livestock.>
If I go with 250
can I forgo supplementing the MH with T5 VHO's?
<You can forget the
actinic either way. It is purely aesthetic, your MH will
provide what
the corals need. Now, will you like the look? It is up to you.>
Or do
I, in any configuration of MH's need the other lights?
<No, but may
prefer them.>
I guess also I realize the 14K bulbs are more actinic
but I like that look unless it will diminish the photosynthesis of my
inhabitants?
<14K with the livestock you list will be fine.>
I
decided to go with Pendant MH instead of the whole light bar kits due to
the varying height over the water required by the different
technologies, is that crazy?
<No, nothing wrong with pendants.>
Also is there really a benefit of double ended bulbs over single ended
bulbs?
<This can become a big argument quickly, but no when you
consider the extra power cost. See Sanjay Joshi's site, he
has
actually quantified all of this. Do pay attention to the shielded vs.
unshielded numbers.
http://reeflightinginfo.com/Home.aspx>
And
lastly I read that with 250W bulbs there is no escaping the need for a
chiller, is
that true or with adequate ventilation with high CFM fans
will I be okay.
<There is no absolute need, but it does lead to the
need for a chiller in many cases.>
I live in Colorado but either way
my wife keeps the house at 72 degrees year round.
<You will likely
be close, try it and see.>
Thanks for the help it is because of your
help I have stayed in the hobby for 8 years.
<Welcome and thank you,
happy the site has helped you so much! You can get away with the 150s if
you place the more light needing livestock in the upper third or so of
the tank. If you want to keep whatever wherever the 250s will do.>
Ryan
<Scott V.>
Metal Halides for 120 Gallon Reef – 07/10/08 Hi Crew,
<<Greetings Jeff>> Really enjoy this web site. <<Me too!>>
It has been of great help as I learn something new every day. Many
thanks. <<Ah good…and quite welcome>> I have some lighting
questions and would very much value your opinion. <<Always happy
to proffer my opinion, mate>> My plan is to have a 120 gallon
acrylic reef tank (48x24x24) made by Tenecor. <<I have a Tenecor
tank…you will be pleased with them>> I will have SPSs in the top
half and LPSs in the bottom half, fish and no clams. I will do a
retrofit style inside a canopy. I will put a fan on the left side
blowing air into canopy and a fan on the right side blowing air out.
<<Okay>> I have done some reading and think the following light
system may work: (2) XM 175W 10K SE metal halide bulbs with an EVC
175W Electronic ballast. This combination was tested by Sanjay as
having 70 PPFD, 11047 CCT and 181 power. <<These “readings” are
fine…and Sanjay has done some wonderful research…but don’t get too
“caught up” in the numbers. Most any quality bulb/electronic ballast
combo will do just fine…what you should really look closely at is
the reflector you will use as a poor reflector will negate any
research you’ve done for the “best” bulb and ballast combo. If you
have the room over the tank and the budget for it, I suggest a
reflector from Lumenarc. Others will do, but these are among the
very best>> I plan to use a Lumenarc III Mini MH Reflector to
increase light to the tank without increasing heat. <<Ah! I
should read ahead… Excellent!>> This should be enough light (I
hope). <<I do think so, yes… Most “die hard” SPS keepers would go
with 250w bulbs/ballasts (some even 400w), but with the quality
Lumenarc reflectors you are planning on using, the 175w should do
fine in my opinion>> I will also have (2) blue T5s. The Lumenarc
reflectors for the XM bulbs measure about 6.5 inches high. I am not
sure how high the edge of the reflector should be from the water but
was thinking about 6 inches. <<Can be, but no closer for sure. I
would strive for about 8-10 inches from the surface of the
water…less splash/dirtying of the bulbs and a bit less heat
transfer…yet still plenty close>> This would put the bulb itself
about 8 inches from the water as the bulb would be sitting about 1
to 2 inches inside the reflector. <<Ah yes…okay>> I will be
sure to have the bulb over the open water and not over any of the
acrylic cover for fear of damage to the tank and its support.
<<Bulbs “too close” to the acrylic can be problematic (I have seen
¾” acrylic that was soft enough to be deflected with a push of your
finger…scary), but you have little concern at this distance and with
positive air flow across the top of the tank. But still, better to
position the MH lighting over “open water” for the increased light
transmission>> Questions and concerns: 1. Is this enough light
to do the job? <<It is… The “light” is not everything though…you
will need to feed your corals and provide optimum water quality and
essential water movement for them to display at their best>> I
really wanted to do the 250W XM but thought that would produce too
much heat. <<In reality…is likely a small measure of difference
overall>> Chiller does not seem possible for me right now.
<<Do not discount the value of evaporative cooling… Positioning fans
to blow over the surface of the display tank as well as the sump
and/or refugium can be very helpful here>> 2. Heat - Cannot use
chiller (wife veto). I am thinking that can be overcome by the fans
in the canopy and 1 fan within the stand. Also the room will be
around 75. <<These will help…but do refer to my earlier comment
re placing fans to blow on/across the water where possible>> 3.
Am I correct in thinking that a 175watt metal halide SE would
produce a good deal less heat than a 250watt SE? <<I have used
both in the past (currently utilizing 250w DE bulbs) and both get
“very” hot. Logic dictates that the 250w system will emit more
energy as heat than the 175w system, but whether this difference is
“sizeable” I do not know…nor do I know exactly how it translates in
“transferred energy” to the display. I think much would have to do
with the lighting system itself (enclosed vs. open, distance from
the water, et al). But I do think the difference in wattage could be
“handled” with some increased airflow (bigger/more fans), at the
least>> 4. Will the light be even across the tank? <<Visibly,
likely so… and the Lumenarc reflectors will do much for this…though
the wide acrylic braces across the top of the tank will impede light
if/as they become obscured with salt buildup…but there will still be
differences in PAR values at the differing distances and angles from
the bulbs, regardless>> Little worried that the reflectors may
cut down on the spread of the light. <<Actually…the ones you have
chosen will probably give you the “best” spread of light for a given
distance from the water’s surface>> Do not want to look at the
tank and see dark, light, dark, light, dark. <<Two of these
reflectors over a four-foot tank should be adequate…any “problems”
with light spread is likely due to their application (e.g. – too
close to the water’s surface)>> Do not think this will happen but
want to be sure. Also will the reflectors hurt the efforts of the
fans as the air moving across the tank will hit the reflector and
not the bulb? <<I do suggest adding fans positioned along the top
of the tank edge to blow across the water’s surface and “under” the
bulbs, as well>> I think the fans will still be productive as the
warm air made by the bulbs will be moving on out of the canopy.
<<This will help, yes>> 5. How many inches should the reflector
be from the water? This is one of my main concerns...heat! Do not
want it to be higher than it needs to be but for sure want it to be
high enough. <<As mentioned…position the reflector to put the
bulb 8-10 inches from the water’s surface>> 6. Will the T5s work
well being that high from the top of the tank? <<The Actinics
only provide an aesthetic value to the system…will be fine. The
“blue” light needed by your photosynthetic organisms is provided in
sufficient strength and quantity by the 10000K metal halide bulbs>>
7. What size area of open water should there be under the bulbs?
Want to be sure none of the acrylic tank gets damaged. <<As much
as possible. The openings that come standard with the tank will
work…But I will state here that I think the wide top perimeter and
cross bracing on production acrylic tanks, while necessary, are a
real pain. Not only impeding light transmission but making working
in the tank/routine maintenance a real hassle as well. If you have
the resources, chat with the Tenecor engineer or sales person and
see about increasing the thickness of the top to reduce the overall
size of the bracing>> 8. Bulbs. Looking over the data taken by
Sanjay the performance of the Ushio 175W 10K SE bulb was very
similar to the performance of the XM 175W 10K bulb, except the CCT
was 8136 for the Ushio bulb compared to 11043 for the XM, both bulbs
were tested with the EVC 175W Electronic ballast. Is this enough of
a difference in the CCT to notice? <<CCT stands for Correlated
Color Temperature…is another way of stating “Kelvin”… The Ushio bulb
is a bit “warmer” in temperature than the XM per Sanjay’s findings,
meaning it will appear more yellow to the eye. Considering the
exceptional quality/reliability of the Ushio bulb, and the fact you
will be supplementing with T5 Actinics, I feel the Ushio bulb to be
the better of the two>> How would this difference affect the
critters in the tank? <<The warmer bulb here will provide more
useful light to the “critters”…and possibly an increase in
growth/vitality>> I am thinking the XM would be more of a blue
color. <<You are correct. The color spectrum of the XM bulb is
fine…I am just not a fan of this brand (have seen too many burn-out
prematurely), though many hobbyists do swear by them>> 9 Ballast
- The performance with the XM bulb was the same with the EVC 175W
electronic ballast and the Icecap 175W Electronic. Between these two
ballasts which one do you prefer? <<I have always used/been a
proponent of the IceCap electronic ballast… But these components
have come a long ways of late, and shopping for price where these
devices are concerned may make more sense these days (heck, there’s
a chance the ballast you choose is a relabeled component of IceCap’s
manufacture)>> One very quick, off the topic, question.
<<Okay>> I plan on getting a Euro-Reef skimmer <<Ahh,
excellent choice! (Is the brand I use too!)>> but not sure which
one would be best for my tank. I am looking at the RS100, RS135 and
the RS180. Which one would you recommend among these three??
<<You can get by fine with the RS135…but I would be tempted to go
ahead and get the RS180 now for that future tank upgrade [grin]…or
if you are planning a very heavily stocked system>> Thanks for
the help! Jeff <<A pleasure to share. EricR>>
Re: Metal Halides for 120 Gallon Reef – 07/11/08 Thanks for
the help EricR. <<Quite welcome Jeff>> I will put your advice
to good use. <<I hope it helps>> I do have just a few more
questions. <<Okay>> 1. What size and how many fans would you
use in the canopy? <<I prefer 3” – 4” 12v computer fans for this.
They are easily found/acquired on the NET along with needed
transformers, inexpensive, quiet (compared to 120v fans), and safer
to use around water (one of my favorite vendors re is here:
http://www.mpja.com/departments.asp?dept=46)… Use at least a
pair…more if they fit>> What brand would you recommend? <<Not
important…but do choose those with “ball” bearings>> I need a fan
that makes the least amount of noise but also one that can do the
job. (My wife wants the tank to be as quiet as possible). <<Been
there myself>> Will follow your advice and put 2 in the stand.
<<Excellent>> 2. I am having a very hard time picking between the
175W and the 250W. I am so tempted to go with the 250W but concerned
that it could get me in trouble with the heat issue. <<Maybe
so…>> I know you said that the 175W will do the job. <<Yes>>
Maybe I am just thinking the old “more is better" thing which can
often lead to a bad decision. <<Sometimes, yes…if without
forethought>> Which one would you go with? <<Considering the
tank here (120g), for my money…the 250w system. It will offer a bit
more flexibility re livestock choices (you already seem to be
leaning towards those with high light requirements), it “may” enjoy
a slight edge in bulb type/choices/manufacturers over the 175w, the
250 e-ballasts will easily serve for DE bulb use should you ever
decide to do so, the 250w system will easily grow/be of use if/when
you upsize your display…and I don’t think there is much difference
re dealing with the “heating issues” between the two. If the
methodology employed is insufficient to mitigate excessive heat
transfer on a 250w system, I doubt it will do much better on a 175w
system. And also consider…”canopy” lighting systems are more prone
to such issues due to their penchant for “trapping” heat near the
surface of the tank>> Thanks a million, Jeff <<Happy to
help. Oh! …and just another thought…consider adding a pair of fans
in the “top” of the canopy to pull rising hot air out…while using
those at the ends to blow “cooler” outside air in. Cheers mate, Eric
Russell>>
R2: Metal Halides for 120 Gallon Reef – 07/11/08 Thanks a
bunch EricR. <<Welcome, Jeff>> Another question about the
fans. <<Sure>> What do you think of the following: Two fans on
the left side of canopy blowing air into tank with 2 more fans on
the right side blowing air out? Then two more fans on top of canopy
blowing air out. That would make a total of 6 fans. <<Will
provide some good airflow for sure>> Even using the quiet fans
will this make much noise? <<Will make some, yes…but will depend
greatly on the fans themselves. Generally the more air they move,
the more noise they make. Some experimentation is with different
fans (luckily they are pretty cheap) is likely in order to find the
best combination of air displacement versus noise. The site I listed
earlier makes this a bit easier by listing the noise level in
decibels for each fan along with the amount of air movement (cfm)>>
If so would 1 fan on each side and two fans on top do the job? (That
decreases the total to 4). <<This is possible, indeed>> Oh
just about forgot, are fans needed in the back of canopy? <<I
think the ends and the top will serve best>> If so which way
should they blow? (will my tank fly away?...hahaha) <<No worries
[grin]>> I will go with your advice and choose the 250watt with
the Lumenarc III Mini reflectors. I am thinking I will be able to
put the lights a little higher with the 250W compared to the 175W
and therefore less heat will reach the water. Is this correct?
<<The added distance will likely mitigate any additional energy
output, yes>> You mentioned earlier that if I went with the 175W
you would put the 175W high enough so the bulb would be about 8
inches from the water. <<As a minimum…correct>> How much
higher, if any, could I go with the 250W and still max out on the
light advantage? <<About 10” above the surface of the water
should be fine>> You have been a tremendous with your help.
Thanks again. Jeff <<Always welcome. EricR>>
R3: Metal Halides for 120 Gallon Reef – 07/13/08 Thanks Eric.
<<Quite welcome Jeff>> One last question. <<Sure>> Should
the fans run 24 hours a day or just when the metal halides are on?
<<Is up to you, but I let mine run 24/7. It doesn’t hurt to keep air
moving around the tank and its components…and I actually think it
adds to their longevity not turning them on and off all the time. I
have a couple 4-inchers over my sump and refugium that have been
running since November 2003…but these have been the exception>>
Thank you, Jeff <<Cheers, EricR>>
R4: Metal Halides for 120 Gallon Reef – 07/14/08 Eric,
<<Hey Jeff>> I just had this idea. <<Okay>> Do you think
this would work: a fan inside the middle section of the canopy,
between the two MH blowing in the same direction as the two fans on
the side of the canopy? <<Hmm…would increase airflow within the
canopy>> Would this be better than a fan on top of canopy blowing
air out? <<Not “better,” no…I think pulling air out the “top” of
the canopy will be most efficient>> I would then have a fan on
the far left side blowing into canopy then a third inside the canopy
between the MH blowing the same direction toward the third fan on
the right side blowing air out of canopy. I was thinking the fan in
the middle would increase air flow. <<Would help…and is up to
you. Feel free to experiment to find the configuration that best
suits your situation. If a fan on top of the canopy doesn’t work for
you (excessive noise or light “leakage”) then try things without it
first, and see if excessive heat transfer is still an issue…you can
always add a fan to the top of canopy later if deemed necessary>>
Thanks again. Jeff <<Always welcome. EricR>>
R5: Metal Halides for 120 Gallon Reef – 07/18/08 Eric,
<<Hey Jeff>> I have been researching cooling fans for my 120
gallon tank (48x24x24). <<Okay>> Would like your opinion on
which one of the following would do best in my canopy. <<Sure>>
Wanting to find the best mix of good air movement but not sound like
an airplane under the hood. <<Understood>> I told my wife I
would make my tank as quiet as possible. <<I feel your pain my
friend>> Here are the ones I am looking at (all are 12v): No.1
CFM - 133.60 dB - 45.9 No.2 CFM - 33.5 dB - 8.7 No.3 CFM - 101
dB -37.0 No.4 CFM - 63.7 dB - 28.0 No.5 CFM - 44.44 dB - 19.81
I have looked at over 100 fans and these 5 seem to have the best
combo of air movement and noise. <<Ah, some excellent research>>
I know No.2 would be very quiet but not sure if 33.5 is enough CFM.
<<Any air movement is going to help/make a difference, especially if
you are exhausting hot air out the top of the canopy…but at less
than 9 dB each you could easily “double-up” if these prove
inadequate and use a total of six units to double the CFM rate
overall and still be quite…quiet>> I plan to follow your advice
and use 3 fans, one on each end and 1 in the middle that would cover
48 inches. Would like to use the fan with 133 CFM but 45 dB may be
too loud. <<I think three of them running in an exposed canopy
would certainly get you a stern look from the missus>> I know it
is hard to judge "noise" as what is noise for one person may not be
for another. <<Not in this case, mate. My reef display and all
ancillary equipment is in my living room (albeit built in to a
wall)…I too had to take “noise” from this in to consideration>>
At the same time do not want any heat problems with the (2) 250 watt
MHs. There has to be a combo that works best, just need to find it.
<<I would be strongly inclined to start with fan #2 and work my way
up…if needed>> Thanks again. <<Always welcome>> Your advice
has really helped me put things together. Jeff <<It is my
pleasure to assist. Eric Russell>> |
Reef Lighting/Selection, 72 gal., MH 12/12/07
Hello,
<Hi
John>
Im putting together a 72g bowfront reef ready reef tank. I plan
to keep LPSs, sps, and clams. I would like to use 2 Viper 150w 14k MH
units for lighting. Will this work for me?
<I've heard from a
reputable etailer that the Viper lights are troublesome. If you want a
clamp on type light, I'd go with Coralife's Aqualight 150HQI. More
money, but well made. Have one myself on a experimental tank.>
Thanks
in advance. Your site rocks!
<You're welcome. James (Salty Dog)>
Regards,
John
Re: Limited MH Lighting Options Available...What’s Best For 43” Deep
Reef? – 11/14/07
Hi Eric,
<<Hello Marc>>
Thanks for the
detailed reply.
<<Hope it was useful>>
The MH bulbs I currently
use are branded "Micron" and they appear to be intended for
commercial/industrial use, rather than aquatic.
<<This is not “all
bad.” Many “Hobby” products started out as/have been adapted from
“commercial” gear>>
A take what you can get situation I assume, as I
did not purchase these bulbs myself but rather my previous aquarium
supplier.
<<I see>>
I believe this is also why my rating of
25,000K does not appear very blue ...
<<Hmm, yes...possibly a
guessed-at or made-up rating even...or maybe these bulbs are VERY old>>
likely this bulb has a very low CRI; similar to the cheap bulbs you see
on eBay with CRI around 60.
<<Another possibility, yes>>
I will
also check my ballasts as I believe the entire MH setup is of
commercial/industrial intention.
<<Even so, these should be
fine...though some bulb brands may work better with than
others...depending...>>
I am thinking now of going with 4 x 400w
10,000k XM, Iwasaki or similar bulbs;
<<If you can get them, Ushio
gets my “preferred” vote for this Kelvin temperature. You can get them
online here for $70.00 apiece
(http://www.businesslights.com/ushio-400w-10000k-mogul-base-metal-halide-lamp-p-853.html)...though
I don’t know if the shipping will kill you. I don’t think Iwasaki offers
a 10000K bulb (at least not here in the states), but if the XM bulb is
all you can get that will be fine too>>
then supplementing with some
actinic fluorescents, as you recommended.
<<Okay>>
With the
adjustment to the duration of the MH, this should also reduce my
electricity consumption I expect.
<<Mmm...do still plan on a MH
photoperiod of at least 10-hours (12-hours is better, in my opinion) per
day>>
Do you think this would be a good route to go?
<<Does sound
“like a plan”>>
By the way, am living in Thailand.
<<Ah! Quite a
large “Freshwater” ornamental fish industry over there, I believe...not
so much geared toward “marines?”>>
Thanks again!
Marc
<<Always
welcome. EricR>>
Perfecto 125gal and reef lighting
Fish Stocking 4/21/06
Hello, it is Gary again. I
have a perfecto 125 gal reef ready aquarium. I have tried, per your
previous advice, to try and build my own sump system but had all sorts
of issues. I have decided to go with a LifeReef lf1-150 system. I now
am trying to decide about lighting. I figured I would have about 4" of
substrate and the tank height is 22". This would mean that the lowest
point would be about 18". I would like to select a lighting system that
would not limit me too much on what I could keep coral or anemone
wise. I was thinking three 250 watt HQI MH with 4 actinic T5s at 39
watt each. Would this be ok or should I got down to 175 or 150s?
<I would use the small wattages>
Next question is what is the
difference between magnetic or electronic ballasts. Is one better than
the other?
<The electronics are better>
I am considering the
ocean light fixtures. Thanks again with your patience with me and all
the questions.
<Bob Fenner>
T5 VS.
Halides...The Great Debate! 6/19/06
Hey everyone,
<Hi there! Scott F. here today!>
I am looking to purchase a new
lighting system for my aquarium and wanted to ask your opinion.
The
tank I have is a 72 gallon bow front with 2x55W pc bulbs (quite poor
lighting for my tank, I know). The depth is ~19” from the water surface
to the top of the sandy substrate. It is a reef tank with live rock all
the way from top to bottom so I can position my corals at various
heights.
My tank is mostly comprised of soft and LPS corals. In my
current setup, I have: 2 well established bubble corals (Plerogyra Sp.),
1 small Galaxea Sp., 1 Open Brain (Trachyphyllia Sp.) which is currently
in my hospital tank, 2 Clove Polyps (Clavularia Sp.), 1 Leather Coral
(Sarcophyton Sp.), Some green and brown star polyps, and 1 coral which
you guys identified as a Stylasterina Sp.
In addition to these, I
would be looking at keeping Anthelia Sp. (I had one but I don’t think my
current lighting could cut it and it slowly died off) and Octobubble
corals (Euphyllia Sp.).
<Interesting mix...>
There are two
lighting systems that I have been trying to decide between, but any
other input you may have would be helpful.
I am currently looking at
a T5 HO system by Tek Light, which has either 4 or 6 T5 HO 54W bulbs
depending which one turns out to be better for my setup.
The other
lighting system I am looking at is a mix between metal halides and pc
bulbs. It has 2x150W metal halides in the center with 2x96W power
compacts at the sides (which I would probably have as actinic
bulbs). This system also comes with 3x1W moon bulbs, but that won’t do
much for the corals (It’s more for aesthetics). The model I am
looking at is a Coralife AquaLight pro.
<Both are excellent systems
from well-regarded manufacturers. They are different in terms of
flexibility, though, IMO.>
In terms of price they come pretty close
(comparing the MH system with the 6 bulb T5 system), with the MH system
costing a bit more (but not so much as to be my deciding factor).
My
local store owner says that the MH system would be of no more benefit
than the T5s unless I am holding SPS corals.
<I would tend to agree.
T5's are amazing lights, and watt-per-watt are some of the most
efficient available, especially in a well-designed reflector (like the
SLS/Tek or Icecap units). However, I have seen a number of SPS systems
maintained with T5's, and they are amazing. I suppose if you were
comparing the T5 setup to a 250-400 watt halide setup for SPS, I would
say hands down, go with halides. On the other hand, it's my personal
opinion that a well-designed T5 setup can equal the efficiency of 150
watt halides, with less energy consumption and heat production. Sure,
halides can do some cool things, such as provide "glitter lines", but
the T5's burn cooler, are less expensive to replace, and offer an
ever-increasing variety of bulbs. In your situations, I'd be inclined to
go with the T5 setup, myself.>
He recommends me to get the T5 system
he sells, but I want a second opinion as he might just be saying that so
I will buy the system from him.
Much thanks for the input,
John
D.
<I'll second the recommendation, for the reasons outlined above.
Do ask around on some of the hobby message boards; ask to see some pics
and hear some testimonials, but I think that you won't be disappointed
with the T5 setup you're looking at! Good luck! Regards, Scott F.>
Metal Halide Addition... Impulse Buying - 08/30/06
Hi,
<<Hello!>>
Looking for a quick opinion.
<<I'm sure I have one>>
I currently have a 75 gallon FOWLR tank (48x18x21). I have an Aqualight
that has 4x65w PC bulbs (2 actinics, 2 10000k). I want to start adding
some corals and such so I want a complimentary MH for my PC lighting.
<<Mmm...have you researched/determined the corals you are adding will
require this type/additional lighting?>>
I basically don't want to
be limited by my light if I'm in a fish store and something that catches
my eye.
<<Please do research your purchases "beforehand" to
determine if you can provide for its needs and to ascertain its
suitability for aquarium (your aquarium) life...impulse buying usually
lands both you and your livestock in trouble>>
I’m wondering if I
should go 175w or 250w and what Kelvin degrees you recommend.
<<For
your tank size/depth, two 175w 10000K MH bulbs will be plenty>>
I'm
leaning towards a 250w pendant but not sure if I want 10000k, 14000k, or
20000k bulb.
<<The pendant is doable if you want to spend the extra
money (initial purchase and bulb replacement/electrical costs) as it can
be easily adjusted for height, and the 10000K bulb is a good choice
though this too is dependant on the species of coral you with to keep
(deep water/lower light requiring organisms would appreciate the 20000K
bulb)...no single lighting solution is suitable for everything that
might "catch your eye"...is best to select/try to replicate and stock
corals from a specific biotope or niche on the reef>>
If I decided
down the road to downsize to a 50gallon tank, would 250w be too much??
<<I've seen folks blast their 55 gallon tanks with 400w halides, but
yes, in my opinion 150w or 175w is completely suitable. I have an SPS
dominated 375 gallon (30" deep) reef and my lighting consists of a
combination of 175w (2ea.) and 250w (3ea.) metal halide lighting which
provides me with great color and growth. You don't have to "blast" your
tank with light...water movement and proper feeding are big factors as
well (and often ignored) to successfully keeping many coral species>>
Thanks for all your help.
Sara Kinnear
<<I'm happy to
assist. Regards, Eric Russell>>
Re: Metal Halide
Addition...Impulse Buying - 08/30/06
Hi,
<<Hello Sara>>
Thanks for your help.
<<Quite welcome>>
I did not mention that I
definitely want a blue carpet anemone for my pair of clowns and
definitely will make sure all my purchases are researched.
<<Then
you'll likely find the anemone is not a good mix with a FOWLR system but
best kept in a species specific display designed/fitted to its needs>>
I just want to know that if I do the research and decide I definitely
want to add "whatever" - I can and would not be limited by my lighting
system.
<<I understand Sara and I'm not here to give you a hard
time, my purpose is to help you to succeed...do be aware that lighting
is only a portion of the equation>>
I am going to purchase a 175w
system and use a 10,000k bulb. Much thanks!
<<Please read here and
among the indices in blue:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/carpetanemones.htm >>
Sara
<<Regards, EricR>>
90 gallon Reef MH question, heat
9/5/06
Bob,
I have read a lot of your articles on WWM
about the Metal Halides and everything else. I currently have a 90
gallon all glass aquarium with a corner overflow. I'm currently using
a Aqualight Plus Fixture contain 2 10k whites and 2 actinics all being
96 watts with the standard wooden canopy above the lighting and the
tank. The tank without the use of a heater stays around 77-78
degrees. I'm playing with the idea of getting the New Outer Orbit
lighting system that contains 2 150w 10k HQI MH and 2 130 watt PC
Actinics. With the tank being a taller tank and liking the shimmering
effect of the MH i wanted to know if there was a way to include
the canopy at least on the outside without worrying about the heat
issue.
<Fans... a chiller...>
I don't mind having an open top
canopy but i would like to at least have some type of a canopy so that
i don't see the light fixture. I was thinking about installing two
fans in the back on the canopy to blow the air out from under
the lights as well as drilling some holes on the outside of the canopy
to allow air flow thru the fixture itself that does contain an 3.5 inch
fan always.
<Better to blow in and out...>
I just don't
really like the fact going somewhere and seeing the lighting
fixture and the light peeking thru the sides between the light and the
top of the canopy, but i do understand that MH put out a lot of heat
but i wasn't sure if these HQI lights with the new design of ballast
put out else heat. But my main issues is being able to put the light
system on the tank without it being too much light for the corals, LPS,
Calms, SPS and zoos and polyps.
<Won't be here>
And having
some type of a canopy around the sides so the tank looks complete like
a piece of furniture not just a tank
please let me know
Thank
you
Drew
<Can be done... will likely need a chiller. Bob Fenner>
Re: 90 gallon Reef MH question. 9/6/06
With the MH being
about 7 to 8 inches off of the water is this ok, or is it going to cause
the light to be too intense for the tank.
<Need to elevate this high
or higher for light distribution and safety reasons... see the
manufacturer's recommendations re>
Do you believe that with fans I
can keep it cool or more than likely i will have to have a chiller,
which i really don't want to purchase at all.
Drew
<More than
likely the chiller will be needed if using 250 watt units or higher. Bob
Fenner>
T5 or MH, Heat Issue...
9/2/06
Hello Crew,
I'm upgrading my 100 gallon tank into
a reef tank. Currently I'm planning on removing my closed canopy and
replacing it with an open lighting fixture. I've set my mind on either
Metal Halide or HO fluorescent T5 lighting.
The thing is, I
don't know which lighting will be better for my setup.
My tank
dimensions are 58" wide and 18" deep. I would like to keep Bubble-Tipped
Anemones and Tridacnid Clams (I would place the clam at the bottom of
the tank). My preference in Corals is still not clear, but I would like
to be open to a wide range of possibilities.
I've read through
your FAQs that Clams prefer MH (and so do I, due to the pleasing
shimmering effect), but heat is an issue to me. My room temperature is
25 C, but my tank is around 27 C and I think it's mainly due to the
trapped heat in the closed canopy (with three 40 watt fluorescent lamps,
will remove soon). I'm also adding more powerful powerheads that will
add up to the heat. I'm not sure if T5's will provide enough lighting
for the intended inhabitants while emitting low heat, and need your
inquiry.
Thank you. Have a nice day.
Mohammad
<<Mohammad: While there are some people who like T5's the vast majority
of people that have anemones and clams (including me) have MH
lighting. If your canopy is open, I don't thing the MH lighting will
significantly increase your temperature. Some day, we may be able to
light our tanks with LED's; but, the technology is still being
tested. Best of luck, Roy>>
Metal halide height above water 7/14/05 Hi. Sorry to bother
you guys again, but I couldn't find the answer I needed on your
online files. I'll be quick. I have a 92 gallon saltwater corner
tank that has a 24" water depth. I have a 192 watt PC unit with a 96
watt 10000K and 96 watt actinic blue in it. When I purchased the
tank, I had to ask about why my glass cover kept cracking, and you
helped me out and now, no more cracked glass. Thank you so much!! I
was cracking up dealing with all of that!! <I am surprised that pc's
produced enough heat to cause the glass to break, but I am glad to
hear that you fixed it!> Well, I wanted to upgrade my lighting
and I am planning on purchasing a 175 watt double ended 20000K metal
halide with 2-18 watt actinics in it. I want to use it with the PC I
already have, however, I do not want more cracked glass. How high
should it be hung over the water? The PC is about 3 or 4 inches
above, and no canopy is used, just the glass cover. <I am
curious about why you use the glass cover. You would probably
double the amount of light reaching your corals simply by removing
the glass cover. I definitely would recommend removing the cover if
you are going to use a halide. The glass will likely get quite hot,
so your risk of cracking it is high. Also, you will not be getting
the full benefit of the upgrade if you are blocking light with the
glass. Also, a double ended fixture will have it's own glass cover
(which must be used!), so your tank cover will be redundant.> I
keep my house well air conditioned, around 74 degrees in the summer.
Will I need a chiller? I like to keep the temp in the tank 76, but
don't care to set it a little higher. <76 is pretty cool. I try
to keep my tanks close to 80, but they often get as high as 85 in
the summer (not necessarily recommended!). Another benefit to
removing the glass cover is that the additional evaporation will
offset the increased heat from the halide. If you remove the glass
cover and keep the ambient temp at 74, you should not need a chiller
to keep the tank at or below 80.> Also, will the lighting
combination I will have be way too blue in color, or will it look
okay? Thank you so much, and maybe I will leave you guys alone for a
long time after this one. Christy <This is a very subjective
question. I personally find the combination of most 20K lamps with
actinics to be unnaturally blue. Try to see others tanks and
replicate the lighting on the tanks you like. Best
Regards. AdamC.> |

|
Metal Halide height above water follow up 7/20/05
Thanks for
your reply, but now I have further questions. You asked why I use the
glass cover and it is mainly because I don't like the mess it makes when
the tank is uncovered. My water return causes quite a bit of turbulence
on the top of the water, which causes these tiny, tiny bubbles to jump
straight up, coating everything with salt spray. As I mentioned, the
corner tank does not have any type of canopy, so there is no way I can
hide salt spray. <The problem of salt spray should be easily solved. I
run a 92 gallon corner tank with 1500gph+ of circulation with no salt
spray problems.>
Is there no way I can purchase a metal halide and
still use a glass cover? <You can run the halide with the glass cover,
but the glass cover will cut down on the amount of light that reaches
the tank, especially when the glass is fouled by salt spray. Keeping
the covers also makes it more difficult to control heat.>
As far as
gas exchange goes, I use large bubble makers, and I run a protein
skimmer 24-7.
<Ah Ha!!! The bubble makers are probably unnecessary,
especially with a skimmer and strong water movement. They are probably
the source of 99/9% of your salt spray. These can almost certainly be
safely eliminated, allowing you to remove the glass covers. The loss of
the bubblers will be made up for by the amount of fresh air reaching the
surface of your water.>
As far as corals go, I don't have any yet,
because I feel my current lighting is insufficient to sustain them, and
I don't like to buy things I know I can't keep alive. The main things I
am hoping to have are a few BT anemones and maybe a few other corals
like hairy mushroom coral, Plate corals, and polyp corals with similar
light requirements. Can a BTA live under my current lighting
conditions? The major thing I want is a bubble tip anemone. I just feel
my tank is a little dark and could use the boost, and who's going to
complain about
glitter lines? <BTA's can be kept under fluorescent
light if you have enough and there is no glass cover. Halides are
definitely recommended.>
I do already have live rock and fish,
snails, crabs, and shrimp. I am just totally confused now. I was
supposed to get the halide for my birthday and now I don't even know if
I can use one if I do. Please help me. I can hang the light any distance
from the glass cover, or could you advise on how to not use a glass
cover without having a huge mess on everything?
<I didn't mean to
discourage you from using a MH light. I only wanted to point out that
you will not get the full benefit with the glass cover in place.>
I
am willing to remove it, as long as it doesn't need wiping off in an
hour. I don't mind wiping it weekly or every couple of days, but don't
want to do a huge cleanup every hour, and the way it is now, I would
have to wipe it off every hour for it not to look gross. <See the
comments above about the bubblers, and your wish will be granted!>
I
value your opinions at WWM and consider them the bible to saltwater fish
keeping. I am sending a picture of
the tank to help you help me.
Thanks so much. Christy
<Thanks for the very kind words. Glad you
have benefited!>
P.S. The reason my glass had broke before, is I was
placing it directly on the glass, not using mounting legs, which I
didn't know I needed. It is funny now at how stupid I am at this great
hobby. Everyone that knows me thinks I am obsessed with it. They are
probably right. See ya. <I don't see any indication of stupidity. We
all make such mistakes. Enjoy your (all of our!) obsession! Best
Regards. AdamC>
Metal Halides - 2 150's on a 90
Gallon 7/16/05
As I'm still in the setup stage and have time to
plan, I'd be curious how you folks would come out on the
following: Specifically, how high would you mount two 150 MH's over a
90 gallon (standard 48x18x24).
<About a foot above the actual water>
I plan on soft corals, and perhaps a few Acropora high up in the
tank. I'd say my house in the summer ranges from 72-74, maybe 75 for a
few hours in the nastiest part of Tulsa summers which hit a solid
100F. Just doing a test without water, I can really feel the heat pour
down, primarily just directly down below the halides.
<Oh yes>
Would your answer change if I was to place glass over all
or a portion of the tank?
<Mmm, no>
How about just some glass
(in addition to the glass tank brace) just below the halides?
<Again, no... I would elevate the MH a foot above all regardless... for
heat and light spread reasons>
I realize the issue of aeration, but
would a glass canopy be a bad idea to deflect heat (or at least deflect
it so it can be washed away by a fan) inasmuch as there will be a sump
with good air exchange there?
<The glass unfortunately will do
more... particularly changing the shift in spectral composition and
blocking light penetration>
I want to be able to avoid a
chiller. Surely that is doable with either fans blowing on a
sump/refugium and/or through the canopy. Btw, the light fixture is a
Sunpaq Outer Orbit, so it has some built in fans. Still, the heat comes
down as noted above? Thoughts?
Thanks very much!
<Please read here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marine/setup/lighting/mhmarfaqs.htm
and the other Related FAQs linked above... and elsewhere on WWM re
chillers, water cooling... You might want to set the light fixtures up
in such a way that they can be adjusted for height, dimmed... timed to
be off during the hottest days. Bob Fenner>
Re: Clams and Upgrading PC Lighting 8/6/05 Thanks for
the response. I am not sure what is available to me so that I can
use metal halide lighting with the setup I have. I have a Current
Dual Lamp light. Do they make bulbs to replace the actinic and day
light I currently have? If they do which one do I replace?<<You're
welcome. MH lighting and PC lighting use different ballasts and
fixtures so that simply replacing bulbs is not an option. You will
need to research MH lighting and determine what is suitable for your
tank. Considerations include the dimensions of your tank, what
livestock you currently have and what you would like to add,
hardware aesthetics (using a canopy vs. pendants vs. fixtures).
Also, you will need to determine what MH bulb(s) you want to use. My
friend, you have a lot of reading! The good news is that WWM has
a lot of information to offer.>> If they don't make a metal
halide bulb how do you suggest I add one (I have enclosed a photo of
my tank). Would adding a halide light be too much for my
corals?<<After determining what MH fixture, bulbs, etc. you are
going to use, please search WWM on "acclimating corals to MH
lighting" and read through the FAQs. Good luck - Ted>> |

|
MH lighting help 9/2/05
Hello WWM,<Hello Cody>
I have
read several Q&As on your site using the search tool and threads on
other sites and can't find a straight forward answer to my question.
My apologies if this has already been asked and I cannot find it.
I
am thinking of upgrading my lighting over my 75 gal (48x18x20H) from 4-
T5 / 2-VHOs to metal halide. This combination gave me a nice blue look
that highlighted the purples too.. but not purple like solely VHO
tanks. I think I'm going to miss the awesome color. Since I already
have the fluorescent Retros, I could use a single or 2 of them for
enhanced color with the metal halide if necessary.. but I would like to
keep the utilities down by just going with Halide if possible. I plan
to have a mixed tank...I love mushrooms and other softies, I have a
frogspawn and Kenya trees, but I am taking a liking to more SPS corals.
So here are my questions..
1) What would you suggest for my 20"
deep tank x 4 ft long...(2) 175W or (2) 250W and why? <I would go with
two 175's which gives you 4.6 watts per gallon, a good ratio for most
corals and anemones.>
2) If I went with the (2) 175Ws and added 1
VHO or 2 T5s for color, would that be suitable for growing SPS? <Yes>
3) If I had to run (2) 250W halides, I would opt not to use the
fluorescents...so is there a nice spectrum bulb that can be run without
fluorescent supplementation? A couple of bulb examples would be
helpful.. maybe a couple of your favorites? <The 250's would be a little
overkill and would add to water temperature problems. 20K bulbs (175's)
have a nice blue accent.>
4) If I ever went up to a 90 gallon tank
(24" tall) would 175Ws work, or would I definitely need to go to 250Ws?
<A 90 gallon tank really doesn't increase your livestock capacity since
the surface area is relatively the same. You would be much better off
going to a five foot tank. And, yes, you would probably need the 250's,
and again adding to water temperature problems.>
Thanks for your
help...-Cody <You're welcome. James (Salty Dog)>
Forgot to add that
my MH bulb will have to be about 8-9" off the water due to my
canopy. I'm not sure if that factors into your decision or not. <Not
much Cody. James (Salty Dog)>
Lighting A Shallow Reef Tank -
11/25/2005
Hi guys, I sure need help.
<We all do now and
then! Scott F. with you today!>
I am setting up a 60gal. 48x15x16
long but not very tall. My dream is to make it a more SPS coral tank
with a few leather corals that I have in a 15 gal. Because the height
of the tank is lower than most, I can't decide on the proper metal
halide wattage. I was thinking 2-175 watts with 2 96 watt actinics.
After 3 in. of sand and a short stack of live rock, maybe just
6-8in.high, would this be to bright and bleach the corals?
<It could
be too bright for some corals; in fact, and new coral needs to be
acclimated to new lighting conditions. For greater versatility and
energy savings, I'd consider going with two 150 double-ended (HQI)
reflectors (like Sunlight Supply "Reef Optix III's or Aqualine Buschke
or PFO pendants. They throw good light over a wide area. Most of the
commonly encountered high light loving SPS corals should do okay under
these lights in this sized tank.>
And would it be to hard on a few
fish that I want as well. The lighting I looked at sits between 4
and 7in above the tank.
<Depends on the types of fishes you intend
to keep. Deep water fishes will require a dimmer setup or more rocks or
overhangs to retreat to if the light bothers them. Also, consider heat
issues in a shallow tank. Be sure to properly ventilate the canopy.>
Thanks
Bob Carter
<My pleasure! Regards, Scott F.>
Re:
Lighting (Boiling) Upgrade 12/15/05
Hi,
<Hello.>
Is
a dual 400watt metal halide (PFO Brand w/10K bulbs) enough light to keep
a crocea clam and Acro corals in a 70 gallon tank (15 inches deep)?
<In my opinion, WAY to much light, x2, 150 watt would-be plenty for just
about anything in this tank.>
Thanks and I appreciate your
assistance and website,
<Quite Welcome.>
Jose
<Adam J.>
Lighting?
Hi,
<Hello>
I have a 65 gallon tank that is
48" and 15" in depth.
<Interesting>
My question is that I am
upgrading my lighting to dual 250 MH with 4X65 (actinic) PC's.
<Mmm,
I would use 150 watt MHs here...>
Both lights are mounted at the
same level and was wondering what height I should have them above the
tank.
<Posted on WWM... likely about a foot>
I have two crocea
clams (bottom) that are my only light intensive animals. I also have
frogspawn and a Monti cap.
Thank you in advance for your
recommendation.
Jose
<Keep reading my friend. Bob Fenner>
Lighting 1/18/06
Hello - compliments on the
site,<Thank you> my foray into reefkeeping would not have been possible
without it. I have a 55 gallon tank, about 20" deep and I am running
Coralife lunar Aqualights (192w). I recently purchased an LTA which is
being hosted by a pink skunk clown and seems to be doing just fine, but
I am considering upgrading my lighting so that I will not have to worry
about lighting requirements in the future. I like the new Current USA
SunPod fixtures (2x150MH) - would you recommend this unit? it does not
contain any actinics, is this a problem? <A very nice unit. I own a
Current fixture and I can attest to the quality workmanship they
provide. The two 150HQI's will be great. James (Salty Dog)>
Thanks, <Welcome>
Chris
Are 150w HQI metal halides enough
for my tank - 01/23/2006
Thanks for the reply, James.
<You're welcome>
One more question:
I was told 150w dual ended
HQI's give off just about as much light as 250w mogul bases. <Don't
believe this is true.> If this was the case, would 1 150w double ended
HQI be enough over my 60 cube, or would you upgrade to a 250w double
ended HQI? <As below, with the depth of your tank I'd go with the 250HQI
for the critters you want to keep. James (Salty Dog)>
Eric
MH vs. PC - 01/24/06
Hey WWM crew
<Hello.>
Quick summary.... 55gal high (36w X 20h X 18d). A friend
of mine has to lights he wants to sell, just curious which one would
suite my needs
better. I have about 60lbs live rock and about 1.5"
sand (still cycling). I do plan on having 1 anemone and 1 or 2 soft
corals with about 4-6 fish.
The light specs are as follows:
280w
Metal Halide
1- 155w HQI 20k
<Are you sure it isn’t a 150 watt
or 175 watt bulb? Furthermore I would use a 10,000K bulb rather than a
20,000K bulb.>
2- 65w Actinic and 192w Power Compact
1- 96w Dual
Daylight 10k & 6700k
1- 96w Dual Actinic 460nm & 420nm
<Since
you plan to attempt an anemone (and I urge you to be patient in trying
such a sensitive animal) I would go with the more intense MH for your
set-up.>
I've heard stories of to much heat and light from a Metal
Halide on a tank my size.
<If you suspend it at least 8
inches above the water, and have a small fan or two you should be just
fine. Also look into a auto-top off system.>
Both are same price,
which do you think I should go with?
<Given just these two choices I
would opt for the MH, Adam J.>
Lighting/Inverts/T5 lighting
for 180 Reef 2/22/06
Hi James, <Hello Roger.>
After doing some additional research there seems to be varying opinions
on T5 efficacy and I'd prefer to purchase a solution once given the
expense. Needless to say I also want what's best for the animals that
will inhabit the tank. Therefore I've decided to not step out of the
box and go with tried and true MH. I have a few related questions if
you don't mind. Any unsolicited advice is very welcome as well!
1. I've read the rule of thumb is 1 fixture for every two linear feet
of tank. You'd mentioned two 250's but would 3 be more suitable? <Three
would be more suitable if cost isn't a problem but if you went with two
250 watt HQI's placed on center 18" from each end (assuming a 72" long
tank), you should have plenty of light. Less light loving inverts can
be placed on the ends. Will only see some light loss on the last 6" of
the tank.> 2. 10K bulbs seem to be the recommended frequency but
there's different
types. One retailer alone sells Iwasaki, Ushio,
Venture, Hamilton & BVL which vary by almost $40 in price. Is there
really a major difference
between a $60 Iwasaki and a $95 BVL? <The
more expensive bulbs usually produce a truer color temperature and a
little more light output.> I'll be using an electronic
ballast,
probably an Icecap. Not sure if that matters. <More efficient, bulbs
last a little longer.>
3. Strictly based on the bulb description
the BVL sounds like it has more blue. Does that negate the need for
Actinics or are they still
recommended? Would a lower frequency
blue be better either as an alternative or to augment the actinic? <In a
mixed reef I would go with 10-14K lamps. Actinics aren't necessary with
these color temperatures.> 4. I'm going to be installing these in an 8"
wood canopy. What's the recommended ventilation scheme, number of fans,
placement, vent holes
etc? <Two fans, opted for the highest CFM you
can get that will fit in the sides of your hood. I'd place one drawing
air and one exhausting air.> I'd really like to avoid buying a chiller
but I don't want the canopy to sound like the inside of a data center
either if I can avoid it. <Might consider Ice Caps temperature
controlled on demand fans.> Also, should I add an insulating material
between the pendant and the wood (it would seem wise) and if so what do
you recommend? <I wouldn't, may melt/soften.>
I apologize for
dominating your time with all these questions but I'd like to preserve
capital so I can afford to put something in the tank
not just over
it :) <I do recommend HQI, cleaner color temperature, bulbs last longer
and takes up much less space in the hood.>
Thanks so much, <You're
welcome. James (Salty Dog)>
Roger
Lighting/HQI -
03/28/06
James, thanks for your timely reply and sound advice.
<You're welcome.> After visiting a couple of LFSs to demonstrate the
difference between fluorescent and HQI lighting, I think she's convinced
that's the way to go. However, most of the 48" HQI fixtures I see for
sale feature 2 150W bulbs. Is HQI that much better that 300 total watts
will be sufficient, or do I need to look around for a higher powered
unit? Do you think it would be beneficial to look into one of the combo
HQI/PC fixtures I have seen on the market? Finally, there appear to be 3
basic choices for HQI spectrum bulbs, 10, 14 and 20K, what would you
recommend? <Watt for watt, the High Quartz Iodide bulbs are much more
intense than fluorescents tubes. What you have to decide here is what
you plan on keeping. Being the 90 gallon is a deep tank, stronger
lighting will be needed if you wish to keep SPS corals and clams. If
that is desired, I would go with a twin 250 or a triple 150 watt
system. The twin 150 HQI's will allow you to keep soft corals and most
LPS corals. Additional fluorescent tubes are not required. I like the
14K lamps. Do read this article and related FAQ's for more info.
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/marlgtganthony.htm
Thanks again for
helping us find our way.
<You're welcome. James (Salty Dog)>
Pearson Hurst.
Lights for a 5ft tank
hi <<
Hi there. >> I have a 5ft, 70 cm deep marine tank and I was wondering
what would be the best MH for my tank (Kelvin, watts and how many) also
I would like to keeps anemones and soft corals
<< I'm unsure if you
meant 5ft deep or 5ft long. Anyway the depth of the tank is the most
important factor for this. I'll assume your tang is 70cm deep. I'd
probably go with two 250 watt halides, and also a couple VHO bulbs for
actinic light. Hope that helps. >>
thanks
<< Blundell >>
Wattage and Kelvin rating
So what would be the best lighting
only in MH for my 5ft L by 70cm H << I would probably go with two (or
three) metal halide bulbs. Each bulb being 250 watts, 14k bulbs. That
is ideal for me. That opinion will change as new products come out, but
for now that is what I would use. >>
(KELVIN AND WATTS)
<< Blundell >>
How much light is too much
Hi Everyone
I purchased a dual 250 watt metal halide kit for my 110 gal. show tank
which is 31 in. tall. I got a great deal on a 157 gal tank and will be
setting it up instead. This tank is only 24 in. tall, is the 250 watt
5500K setup too much for it? <No, it is not too much for the corals but
I would change the bulbs to 10k instead of 5500k. 5500 is too much on
the yellow side and you will get more algae growth in the tank.> In
going to the new tank I will need to add 1 more light since the 110 was
4 ft long and the new tank is 7 ft long. Should I sell the 250 watt kit
and go with a triple 175 watt? <Proper light coverage is best. I would
recommend 3 MH bulbs or even 4 for a 7ft long tank.>
Thanks
Robert
<No Prob. MikeB.>
48" DE HQI setup (Like Aquaspacelight
setup)
<Hello, MikeB here.>
I currently have 55 gallon long
reef tank for 4 years. My setup is of the following
Since I have a
question on light I will describe detail 2x ARO elect ballast with PFO
pendant ICECAP 10k bulb and 2 x 54 watt T5 ATI Actinic bulbs they are
all in my 10" high Canopy with 2 icecap fans.<Ok, sounds good.>
Corals are growing fast and liked Icecap 10k bulbs but would like to add
more blue so I am thinking about putting one more 150watt HQI in the
middle (I have extra setup for one more 150watt HQI and do not want to
buy 250watt setup)
Putting 150watt in the middle is this bad idea? I
know there is a fixture from Aquaspacelight 2 - 250 watt HQI Metal
Halide with one single 150 watt 20K double ended metal halide mounted in
the center.<No, not a bad idea, just put your higher light corals
underneath the 150 watt bulb and your lower light corals to the outside
of the tank.>
I was thinking about putting 150watt HQI 20k Ushio in
the middle with 2 x 150watt HQI 10k icecap and 2 x 54 watt ATI actinic
bulbs.
Any recommendation?<Uh, 450 watts on a short tank is a
tremendous amount of light. It would make your tank look awkward in my
opinion. I would take the 20K bulb and put it in the middle with one
10K on each side.>
Tank: : 55gallon 48" length 13 deep TruVu
Filtration: Custom build sump 30x 11 x 16 (small refugium mangroves with
27 watts 64k)
Skimmer: AquaC Ev-90
Pump: Lifeguard 1140gph
external pump
Circulation: two 1/2 sea-swirl in the both comer
attached to Lifeguard 1140gph pump one Rio SEIO 620
Overflow: CPR
102DX 1400gph in the middle
Refugium: 10 gallon (20x10x16) custom
made above tank
refugium (CPR hang-on style) RIO 2100 from right
side of main tank to drop left side of main tank
Light: 2 x 150 watt
HQI 10k for main tank 2 54 watt T5 actinic
Chiller: CSL inline 1/4
HP Inline Chiller
Live Rock: 80lbs
Live sand: 70lbs in display
tank and 20lbs in above tank refugium and 10lbs in sump.
Corals:
Ricordeas, mushrooms, buttons, sun polyps, leathers, brains, hammer,
frogspawn, 2 squamosa, 3 maxima, 3 Crocea, Some SPS flags
Chris Kim
<Well you have enough filtration and I can see why the corals are doing
so well. Again, I wouldn't concentrate the light on one area of the
tank. Spread it out. MikeB.>
Re: 48" DE HQI setup (Like
Aquaspacelight setup)
Mike, thanks for your comment.<Sure, no
problem.>
I have current 2x 10k 150watt HQI located to cover 24"
each and plan to put 1x 20k 150watt in the middle is this bad location?
<I don't think so. But if your tank has a center brace then some of the
light will be diverted.>
Or I should put evenly 3 HQI distance?<Do
as you plan but you definitely want them even distance from each other.
My pendant is about 9 inches so I have current setup like this 10"--- 9"
(10k HQI) --- 10"---9" (10k HQI) --- 10" = 48"
So my next setup was
going to be 10"--- 9" (10k HQI) ---1"--- 9" (20k HQI)---1"---9" (10k
HQI) --- 10" = 48"
<I would do it this way from left
(6"-light-5"-light-5"-light-6")>
I currently have them about 6" from
water (from water to HQI bulb not pendant end) should I raise little
more? (Maybe I should so that middle 20k could cover more area...)<I
would go at least a foot for the salt spray. If any cold water gets on
a hot bulb....no more bulb.>
Oh, also some people suggest actinic
light 12 hours...
So after setup I was thinking following:
11
hours 2x T5 54watts
9 hours 1x 20k HQI (middle)
8 hours 2x 10k
HQI
13 hours light refugium.
Could you tell me your opinion? <
you want to go dark to light. So, when I would turn on the actinics
first then the 20k then the 10k and when I turn them off I would go 10k
to 20k to actinics. As far as length of photoperiod you have to
determine that by the way your corals react. I would run the light on
the refugium opposite of the tank.>
Thanks
<Good luck. MikeB>
Metal Halide Lighting 12/22/04
Hi, I have a 5ft L x 75cm H x 58cm
W and was wondering how many metal halides to buy????? (I was told that
3x 150watts would be good). <The general rule is to cover about 2 ft per
MH lamp, so your tank falls in the middle of two or three. If you have
center brace(s) over your tank, I would let that decide. Never place a
MH lamp directly over a center brace (acrylic or glass tanks).>
I was
wanting to keep soft corals and anemones and what is the best Kelvin for
these species. <Two or three 150w or 175w lamps would be fine, but the
anemones would have to be closer to the light.>
Also with metal
halide can you use cover glass??? (I was told that it blocks out most of
the light) (but the fish might jump out) ??????? Thanks
<Although
fish jumping can be a problem, I would only consider tank cover glass if
you are keeping notorious jumpers (jawfish, firefish, etc.). Even then,
the downsides (reduced evaporation, higher heat retention, light
reduction) are great. Best Regards. AdamC.>
Metal halides over
the center tank brace
All:
< Blundell here tonight. >
Thank you for your valuable advice. I am in the process of upgrading
the lighting on my 125 gal. 72X18X22. I will be going with MH mogul
based in 20K. I will be purchasing a new canopy in either 10" or 12"
depending on your advise. I wish to keep LPS, soft and limited SPS. I
will keep the SPS confined to the upper 1/3. I know these are broad
categories, but I will place specimens as needed. My question is should
I go with 3 X 175 watts in a 10" canopy or 3 X 250 watts in a 12"
canopy? < With those options, I'd chose the later. The more watts the
better in this case. > I have never kept SPS but it is my understanding
that 20K bulbs don't put out the same PAR per watt as say 6500 or
10K's. < Very true. 20k have better color for the corals, but grow
slower and don't look very bright. I use 20k now, but will probably
switch to 14k or 10k next time. > Also, there is a 12" 1/2" thick center
brace that one of the three lights will be directly over. Is 10" or 12"
of clearance in the respective wattages safe? < It is safe, but the
shadow of the brace really cuts down on how well that bulb will
work. You may want to have that brace replaced with acrylic, or have
your lights staggered so that the middle bulb isn't right over the
brace. > The canopy will be well ventilated (fans. etc.) Thank You!
Ben
< Blundell >
Upgrade to Metal Halides?
Good morning,
<Hello Ralph>
My reef aquarium has been up and
running for a year and a half. Right now I have 260 watts of PC lighting
and am interested in upgrading to Metal Halides. My question revolves
around my beautiful cover of coralline algae. Will the sharp increase of
light intensity burn or destroy the nice color or will it adjust to the
new light intensity.<It will adjust, though I would recommend starting
the halides at one hour and increase by one hour daily> The aquarium is
a standard 75 gallon. Currently we house a variety of soft corals and
mushrooms. We have a small Montipora frag we are trying to cultivate.
Everything is happy and looks great but we are interested in taking
things to a new level with some SPS coral. Will and additional 260 watt
PC fixture have a similar effect to adding the metal halides.<Another
260W fixture would give you 6.9 watts per gallon which would be
plenty. I believe your 75 is 18" deep. Halides generally penetrate the
water deeper so you might want to try adding two 175W halides to your
existing fixture. Personally I like the effect 10K lighting does to the
appearance. James (Salty Dog)
Thanks,
Ralph
Re: Upgrade
to Metal Halides?
Dear James,
Thanks for your quick
reply.
Assuming I go with the metal halides, will I need to do
anything special to protect the mushrooms. Currently they are deep in
the aquarium (near the bottom) and off in the corners. I have read that
mushrooms do not necessarily like the intense lighting halides
provide.<No, just acclimate to the halides. James (Salty Dog)
Thanks,
Ralph
Juwel Trigon 190 Litre - upgrade to MH
1/16/05
First post - thanks for your site - great!
<cheers... and welcome my friend>
I have a Juwel Trigon 190 Liter
bow fronted tank with 1 x 18W 24" Arcadia Marine White and one 18W 24"
Arcadia Actinic.
I am keeping a few polyps and want to house a
greater selection of corals. The polyps seem to have lost their
'greenness' and are looking brown - although apart from that they are
looking healthy and opening out.
<the lack of UV and overall light
intensity is the root cause here>
I want to increase the lighting
intensity and have been looking into an Arcadia 3 Series 70cm 250W HM
bulb with 2 x 18W actinic bulbs.
<very fine choice>
This unit hangs from the ceiling - which is necessary as other style
units would not fit onto the bow front. Is this a suitable selection for
a tank of this size (43 UK Gallons)
<yes... quite fine. Its a touch
on the bright side, but no worries... especially with the common
tendency to use bluer lights>
Given the existing lighting scenario -
is there a significant difference between the light output of what I
have and what I'm looking at -
<yes... tremendous. Acclimate the
present corals slowly to the new light by use of the "screen method" (do
a google search of our website wetwebmedia.com from the index page to
find more info on this)>
and what height above the water should I
have the MH kit before lowering it down for acclimatization.
<about
25 cm. off the water surface or higher for its final resting place. No
need to start it higher at first if using the screen method>
Thanks
for a great site. Tim - UK
<best regards, Anthony>
MH question
Hi, I have a 5ft L X 2ft W X 75cm H and was just
wondering would 1 X 250watt metal halide placed in the middle be enough
for soft coral and host anemones to live???? If not then what else would
you recommend with out breaking my wallet???? <Dana, that wouldn't be
enough unless you put your corals etc in the center of the tank. The
ends of the tank wouldn't be all that bright. If money is the object you
might be better off with a PC hood with four 65 watt tubes. These are
$212.00 plus shipping from Drs. Foster & Smith and they have a built in
cooling fan along with two lunar lights for a nice night effect. They
are listed under the brand name "Satellite" although the units are made
by "Current". James (Salty Dog)>
MH question more
Follow-up
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005
Hi, My Tank has 3 braces on it
so how would you do it??
<You can use a retrofit kit and mount them
in a hood or you have the option for a hanging pendant.>
Also how
much are metal halides to run power-wise?
<Dana, that all depends on
the wattage of the lamps and the type of ballast you are using. The
electronic ballasts will use a little less current and extend the bulb
life along with slightly increasing the intensity of the lamp. James
(Salty Dog)>
MH question follow up 1/31/04
Hi, I live in Australia do you know somewhere I can get them from here,
Also is 3 x 150 watts MH alright for my size tank? Thanks
<I would
suggest searching the 'net for an aquarium club in Australia. They will
be able to give you better info on equipment availability than we would.
I would suggest 2-3 lamps to cover your tank, and in my opinion, 150w is
plenty for 90+% of the corals you will probably keep. Best Regards.
AdamC.>
Upgrading to halides in the UK
Dear Crew
<Hello Jim, Justin here.>
After much deliberation and soul searching
I am considering upgrading my lighting to a metal halide set-up.
After reading the conscientious marine aquarist I have a few pertinent
queries for an old UK reefer like myself.
<Sure will do my best>
My current lighting is as follows:
4 58W Arcadia Marine whites
1
Actinic 03
1 T5 80w
Totaling around 300 watts of light.
<good
setup but what sized tank?>
I currently keep a few hardy stony
corals with some soft corals in a well pruned reef garden setup which
consists of
2 Euphylliids
2 Caulastreas
1 Porites (growing very
slowly under the strip lights)
1 Pavona
1 Montipora
2
Turbinarias
Various Sarcophytons, cabbage corals, and polyps.
These are placed as per the coral requirements around half way to within
the top of the reef wall in my 120 gallon set-up.
<Good to see and
not a lot of light for a 120 at depth so good to see them being near the
top.>
This 300 watts has served me well and as you probably all know
halides are expensive but remove the need for all my fluorescent
ballasts etc.
<Yes and no... You might keep the actinics to get the
color you want, or go with 10,000k MH lights to get those blues as well,
but that is based on your personal tastes.>
I would like increased
growth from the halides but I am worried about 'scorching' the corals
with an upgrade to the Arcadia 400watt pendants (6 foot triple halide
unit)
<A concern yes, do acclimate them using short photoperiods,
some grating to break the intensity down and lowering the corals some,
as well as lowering the light unit very slowly to no lower than 7
inches. those 400's may need 10" height to keep things cooler. >
I
am eyeing up. I can acclimatize the existing corals by shifting the unit
away from the aquarium and bringing it in slowly. Also I am considering
a fan for cooling, alas a chiller is well out of my cash reserves
resource.
<Please do this as well as buying some egg crate to
diffuse the lighting, read on the FAQ's for more info on that. Also you
will need a lot more than 1 fan to cool things down. If you cannot
afford a chiller maybe look into 250 watt halides that run cooler and
use fans to cool the lights and blow across the surface water to cool it
more.>
Mr. Fenner seems Initially skeptical of halides in his book
but I fear the stony coral growth is just too slow with strip lights for
my liking.
<Not sure on that as I have not read his book, however
halides are not lights that people should normally use as they can be
dangerous, can overheat the tank, and can scorch and bleach corals.>
Wondered what our thoughts and recommendations are.
Thanks
Jim
<Good luck on this as proper lighting is a tough question to decide. I
would go with 250watt lights as a max, unless you can get a DIY chiller
out of an old fridge or something as MH lighting can drastically raise
water temps, very easily. Good luck and hope your stonies do better with
these lights.>
<Justin (Jager)>
MH Lighting
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005
I am really amazed by how much info you have
on your website. I am in the process of upgrading my 55 gal reef
to 155 gal. I am planning on having soft ,SPS and some clams. I
had my soft corals now under pc lighting. My question is, what kind of
metal halides and do I still need actinic lighting with that or not. I
saw a guy who keeps his 155 gal reef under 3 HQI bulbs,250 watts
each,13,000 k .What do you think of those??? He does not have actinics
and his corals and really fascinating. Thanks.
<Hello Ramy, My
suggestion is, for the corals and clams your interested in would be
three 250 watt metal halides and two 96 watt PC actinics. This is
assuming your tank is 60"x24"x24". As far as the HQI bulbs, I don't
think they are any better than the standard metal halides, they cost a
bit more. But, being you want to keep SPS and clams, you will need at
system like this, especially if you get any T. crocea clams which do
require very strong lighting, and are the least hardiest of the clams
with T. derasa being the hardiest. Good luck. James (Salty Dog)>
VHO/Power Compacts VS Metal Halide
By spending an outrageous
amount of money in this hobby I have learned a few things that have led
me to believe that the simplest way to setup and maintain a Reef tank is
to stick with the basics and not to go overboard on the vast amount of
equipment available (I should write a book on what not to do in the Reef
hobby).
<Please do>
Now with that being said, I was thinking about
changing my current lighting from VHO/Power Compacts,
2-VHO/White/Actinic 1-VHO Actinic & two 96W 50/50 Total of 672W to a new
Aqualight Pro, which has 3-MH, 4-PC & 3-Led lights giving me 834W. I
have a 135g Oceanic with Sump, Remora Pro, two Mag 9.5 Returns and 3
Tunze 6060's...
<Heeeee! A larger heater and you could make this into
a Spa-bath!>
...with about 300 Lbs. of Live Rock and a 3-4 inch sand
bed. I would like to know before spending this kind of money if I would
be gaining that much?
<That much.... for...?>
I understand that I
am increasing the amount of wattage, but am I also gaining a "new look"
within the tank that I will be pleased with? I would appreciate any
advice you can give me.
Art McKinney
<Mmm, not possible to render
subjective evaluations for others... that is, what you might be pleased
with is not within my domain of assessment... Depending on what you hope
to "accomplish" functionally (boost growth? Color?) or aesthetically
(again, up to you), you might be better off investing your funds in... a
calcium reactor... an ozonizer... perhaps with a desiccator... A new
refugium... another tank! Bob Fenner>
Re: VHO/Power Compacts VS
Metal Halide and The Toilet Bowl Syndrome
Thank you for your
quick reply, the Aqualight Pro runs about a $1000 for the lights and
accessories.
<Yeeikes! New idea... save this money up and come on out
and stay with a bunch of the WWM Crew at out house... for a month,
diving, hiking enjoying yourself in Hawaii... April... take a look for
airfares... think of the enjoyment of just the anticipation...>
I
guess what I was trying to ask is if the light output from the Aqualight
Pro would be better than the VHO lights. I am not sure what the Spectrum
is for VHO's compared to Metal Halides so I am not sure if I would be
gaining anymore than the wattage....Spa, funny, everyone says we should
have flow within the aquarium, the sad thing is that all of my fish are
plastered to the glass.
<I'll bet... AM serious re HI. Bob Fenner>
Of VHO/Power Compacts vs. Metal Halide and Tax Returns
Again,
thank you for your quick reply and the invite to Hawaii....When I see my
Tax return I may have to take you up on this offer:) So, are you saying
that I won't notice a difference going from the VHO setup to the Metal
Halides?
<I can only speak/speculate for myself... I would NOT be
switching... unless there is some compelling reason you have... Bob
Fenner>
Lighting/MH
First of all. I just found your site
and think it is fantastic. I am relatively new to reef keeping and have
a question about lighting. I currently have about 4 watts per gallon
(PCs with actinic supp.) but was told by my LFS that in order to keep
some of the clams and stonies I wanted I would need 8 to 9 watts per
gallon. Without researching (I know. I'm an idiot) his claim, I went out
and bought 2 x 400W 14000K Metal Halides (and all the fans, ballasts,
etc) which will bring my tank to 8.6 watts per gallon. Now, having read
a lot on your site, I am worried that I am about to bake up some
livestock. For a 93-gallon tank, is 800 watts way too much? Or can I
slowly acclimate the tank and get away with it? Thanks, Michael Stoner
<Mike, it's not an unusual amount of light for keeping SPS, LPS, and
clams. As you say, slowly acclimate the critters to the higher intensity
lighting. I think you will love the way it will look. I envy you. James
(Salty Dog)>
Lighting for S/W
Hi there. Have just
gotten new tank 32X18X18 (Inches) small I know, but it's custom cut for
an alcove. Thing is it has a brace, 6" wide, across the middle, from
front to back. Will this affect the lighting in this area of the tank.
Am thinking of getting 150 watt MH. That's all for now.
<Yes, it
will affect the light, Mark. If you're planning on SPS etc corals, I
would go with two 150's and place them in the open areas. If no hard
corals, two HQI 100's would be OK. James (Salty Dog)>
Metal
Halide question 3/30/05
Hello, I have read through all of your
metal halide FAQ's with regards to a 90 gallon reef aquarium. My
aquarium is 48"X18" by 24" deep. The tank has been running for a month
now without lights and I'm now ready to install them. I definitely going
with metal halides. I want to keep mostly SPS and Clams. What wattage
should I be choosing? 175, 250 or 400W? Marine Depot is recommending
400W.
<400w would be overkill IMO. If you use quality reflectors and
keep the clean and keep the water clear, I don't see any reason to go
over 250w, even for SPS and Clams. In my experience with 400w MH, many
corals had to be place very low or in the corners to prevent OVER
illumination.>
Also, should I be supplementing this with power
compact lighting? I read about a lot of folks supplementing their MHs
with power compact and wonder if I should be as well?
<This is
purely an aesthetic question. I prefer VHO over PC, but actinic lamps in
either format can be used to add more "blue".>
Also, can you
recommend a type of ballast, for example Ice Cap?
<Icecap ballasts
are great, and their customer service is very good. The premium price of
electronic ballasts is quickly paid for in increased lamp life. If you
want to save on up front costs, most companies use internal components
from the same couple of companies, so shop customer service and price.>
Additionally, do you prefer double ended over the standard bulbs? I will
be installing these in a custom canopy that is 16" high. Should I be
looking at retrofits or explore pendants? Many thanks in advance.
-Brent
<The reflectors for double ended lamps generally reflect more
of the light into the tank than those for single ended lamps. Do search
the archives at
www.advancedaquarist.com for Dr. Sanjay Joshi's studies on lamps and
reflectors. The choice between retrofit kits and pendants is mostly a
function of how handy you are and how frugal you are. Best Regards.
AdamC.>
Metal Halide Question 3.25.05
G'day
<Indeed!
Ryan with you today.>
I've just located your site which I might add I
find fantastic. However I still have a lighting question.
<Shoot>
We are new to Marine Tanks after keeping tropicals for many years. We
have a tank that is 500 litres (sorry for the Imperial measurements but
I’m in Australia) the measurements are 30" Deep 30" Wide and 4' Long.
Can you advise on the best lighting?
<Only metal halides create
enough usable light in the depths of a 30 incher! I would recommend a
pair of pendants.>
We currently have 1 double compact with 1 white
bulb and 1 blue bulb, 1 moonlight and dual 4ft fluoro being one blue
bulb and 1 white bulb. All are around 37 watt (this does not seem high
enough after reading your site?). We also seem to end up with a lot of
yellow light in our tank that make the tank look dirty or "acidy".
<And the water itself at this depth filters most of the usable light.>
Our tank seems healthy and we successfully keep Leathers, Bubble Coral,
Morphs, Cushion, Torch Coral or Finger's, Jardini's and soft tree's, we
are unable to succeed with hard corals they all die Dunno why.
<Yes,
you do! You have identified it in this email. Combine a new lighting
system with proper calcium/alkalinity levels, and they will take off.>
We are looking at MH Lights but find they are too expensive to purchase
and run but we are unable to work out the best lighting for looks and
for growth. Everywhere we go that have MH's their tanks look amazing and
I say that's what I want but after reading a lot on your site I believe
I can accomplish both looks and growth with less expense.
<You can
build your own metal halide for CHEAP. Are you handy? ozreef.org. If
not, look for used lights- They are typically only in need of a bulb
change, and you are back in action. Good luck, Ryan>
Metal Halide Lighting
Hello crew how are you tonight? Well
anyways I would like to ask you a question about metal halide lighting.
I have a 60 gallon FOWLR that I would like to make a reef. Would 2 - 400
metal halide bulbs be over doing it? I think it may be a little
overkill. On my calculator I punched in 400 x 2 equals 800, divided that
by 60 and came out with a whopping 13.333!! That would mean I'd have 13
watts per gallon?!! Is that to much for corals? Also Ritteri and BTAs?
Well I'm in a big hurry so if you would try to reply back soon.
<Chase, two 175MH"s would be plenty for keeping anything. That gives you
5.8 watts per gallon. I would suggest 10K bulbs. James (Salty Dog)>
Thank your great crew!
Sincerely, Chase Simmons
Lighting
for S/W
Hi James.
<Hello Mark>
I can only afford one 150w
M/h (Arcadia Series 3) for my 32x18x18 tank. Which will put it directly
over the brace (Great) Never simple, is it?. Do you think I need more
light? I have a few soft corals. Planning on an Anemone and some hard
corals in my new system (Miracle mud refugium too!) Local shop told me
that I could put two 3" braces either side of the 6" brace in the
middle, then take the larger one out. Can the braces be put at either
end of the tank to form a square with the other braces running along the
back and front panels. Why does the tank need these braces at all? 8mm
glass doesn't flex, does it? (Sorry, rhetorical questions ...) This
brace is driving me bonkers. Great site, thoroughly enjoyed. That's all
for now.
<Mark, to protect the warranty of your tank, I would
contact the tank manufacturer about the change in bracing you want to
do. My thinking is the manufacturer isn't going to spend any money on
materials if they aren't required. That would be enough light for one
side of the tank, or the middle area, but not enough to place corals
anywhere in the tank, they will have to be under the light wherever it
ends up. James (Salty Dog)>
Lighting/Metal Halides
Hey
Guys,
<Hello Ryan>
I am truly addicted to your site. I read this
site and all of the FAQ's almost nightly. I feel like I owe it to my
aquarium friends to provide the best light possible. I have one question
in regards to an upgrade in lighting. I have been looking over MH and PC
for quite sometime and have decided to go with the MH for multiple
reasons; longevity, appearance, intensity and price I found to keep my
first Anemone. I have an 80 Gallon standard tank 48X18X24" deep. If I
get 2-250 Watt MH retros to install in my canopy will this be sufficient
for mostly SPS and an Anemone?
<Yes>
Also where do you place
these Retros for maximum light distribution? I thought perhaps just
centered in the width and placed at 12" and 36" across in the length of
my canopy. I hope my question makes sense and I would feel honored to
have you write me back. I use your advice as fact. Thanks for
everything, Ryan Willard in NORCAL.
<Ryan, I would put them at 16"
centers and would use bulbs in the 10-14K range. James (Salty Dog)>
MH Lighting - The Maddox Take
Hi, I've read your web page several
times. I tried to read your MH FAQ, but man there are 100's and several
of them say that "This is the way" and the next one is just the
opposite. Don't get me wrong, I've learned that this hobby is just like
Religion or Politics, "Every one has an opinion and almost always no 2
are the same.
<Hmm...obviously I'M right and everyone else is wrong
;)>
Now on with it. I'm putting together a 110g 30" tall glass tank,
48x18x30. Putting in a NNR sandbed which will reduce the depth to 24
1/2". The live stock that I would like to have (hope to someday get, 1
at a time) Open Brain, Green Moon, Moon Stone, Hammerhead Anchor, Green
Torch, Galaxy, Purple Elegance, Tongue, and a Whiskers. As for the
Leathers I like the toadstools. The Soft Corals are Colt and Finger. I
like most of the Xenia's, Polyps, Sea Mats, Mushrooms and the Carpet,
Rose and Flower Anemone's.
<So much allelopathy in there you'll get
cancer! ;) Give the LPS plenty of room between each other, and do run a
lot of carbon. Also, I DO NOT recommend mixing anemones with corals -
completely unnatural, most always leads to the death of the anemone -
I've a very low opinion of those that attempt the mix, frankly. Set up a
species tank for anemones, and leave them out of the chemical soup of an
LPS\softy tank!>
As for fish, I've looked at a pair of Gold striped
Maroon Clowns, Regal Tang, Mandarinfish, Royal Gramma, Coral Beauty, and
a Flame Angelfish. Plus the norm, Brittlestar, Shrimp and starfish. I
will have a 75g sump with PC 96w Quads running at night.
I got 2-250w
Double end 10K Aqualine by Aqua Medic. They are small hanging pendants,
that I want to put in a 16" hood. With 4-54w T5's, 2 Actinic and 2 10K.,
2 Moon lights with 4-4" fans and slots in the top of the hood, with an
open area in the back in the bottom.
The plan is to have the Moon
lights and the sump lights on at night. In the morning have the Actinic
and the T5 10k on and the Moon/Sump go off. When the MH come on the T5
10K go off. In the evening have the T5's come back on as the MH go off.
Then all the T5's go off as the Moon and Sump come on. Now that I read
more and went to a Coral store and seen the MH, just like mine running,
I really don't need the actinic lights.
Please give me some input
here as to your thoughts. I was worried about heat, too much light, the
MH in a hood etc. I need the hood because the only place that I have for
the tank is opposite my TV in the living room. The lights out of the
hood, then you can't see the TV. I already have everything ready to go
except the Corals and Fish. I have 2-1/4 horse drinking fountains that I
will convert to Chillers if needed.
Do I have an over kill on the
lights? Are the 250w to much, I wanted 175w HQI DE but I don't think
that anyone makes them as of yet. Anyway thanks for your time.
<For
an LPS\Softy tank I do think you have a bit much - you will have to be
careful acclimating them to those lighting conditions, plus the excess
electricity usage...is it possible to exchange them for 150 DE's? If
not, I would either run just the halides (and maybe 1 actinic t5) or
even just the T5s without halides. LPS\softies really don't require much
light>
Rick Johnson
<M. Maddox>
MH Lighting - The Maddox
Take II
So you're saying that I screwed up when I bought the
250's? I was looking for a pair of DE 150's but I could never get the
matched pair and the 250's came along so I grabbed it.
<Not
necessarily screwed up, you still have a nice set of 250s, but for the
species you're intending to keep they're just unnecessary>
I have the
set up for the T5's and an extra ballast for 2 more. I also have a setup
for 4-110w VHO.
<Well hey if you have those already, go with the T5's
and VHOs and use the 250s for tanning ;)>
This is my 3rd Reef tank
that I am building in the last 10 years. The first went south when I
moved. The second died when I went on vacation and my Great Niece threw
a bottle of hair die activator in it.
<Did you let her live?>
So
for this tank I was buying one thing at a time so that it would be right
when I was ready to set it up. I'll see if I can sell the 250's or trade
them for some 150's so if you know of anyone I'm here.
<Could try the
selling forums on ReefCentral, they get a lot of traffic>
As for the
Coral/Anemone set up, nothing has been bought as of yet. Yes and you're
right in my last reef my anemones spent most of the time hiding in the
L/rock except when I would feed them or up high on the side of the tank.
The clowns and the Leather, Elegance, Frogspawn, Hammer or Anchor might
work together instead of a Carpet.
<Yep - and BTW those 250s are
waaaay too much for that elegance>
When I said that "these are the
live stock that I want", that was a wish list. I know that with the size
of tank that I have, that there is no way to have all of them. If I did
they would all have to be small, but if you do it right, they some day
will grow up and crowd each other out.
<Just making sure :)>
So
back to the lighting. What would be the best lighting combo for this
setup. 2-150w DE, The T5's and if the T5's were the chosen how many or
VHOs and again how many?
<6x55w T5s would work perfectly, or 3xt5 and
2x VHO, however you want to arrange it. A good amount of light, but
without the massive intensity which isn't needed for the species you're
interested in, and in some cases (like the elegance) would be downright
harmful>
Thank you for your time.
<Sure thing>
Rick
<M.
Maddox>
Upgrading to 180 gal from 90 - Lighting options
Hi
guys,
<Hello there>
Okay, I have a 90 gal mixed reef and I’m
making lava.
<Heee!>
2 400w AB 10k’s w/2 110w 03 actinics. Before
you share your shock, the tank has been in operation for two years and
is booming. The SPS are beautiful and I shade the LPS under
outcroppings. My yellow Fiji leather is tremendous. No casualties due to
lighting so far.
<Just strain on your heart when the electrical bill
comes>
I just purchased a 180 gal acrylic tank that came with 3 150w
HQI pendants in the hood w/2 110w actinics. When I make the swap I want
to know if you think the 3 150’s with 2 – 4 160w actinics would be
enough light for the mixed tank or should I use 3 400w MH’s (2 of which
I currently have on my 90) w/2 160w actinics?
<I would definitely go
with the new, smaller wattage MH's. Bob Fenner>
Re: Upgrading to
180 gal from 90 - Lighting options
Thanks for getting back to me.
<Welcome>
Yes, my wife does my CPR with defib every time the electric
bill comes in.
<Heeee!>
For the sake of my retirement fund, I was
hoping you would tell me that the lower wattage bulbs would be okay.
<Will be>
Do you think the SPS corals will have any difficulty
adjusting to 5 - 6 watts per gallon from the current 11 they currently
enjoy basking (or is that baking) in?
<Will do so... I'd cut back
the existing over a few weeks time, in anticipation>
I have read
everything I could find online regarding the lighting options for a 180
gallon tank. Most tanks I have read about are using 3x250w MH in one
form or another. I just don't want to under light the tank (spoiled from
having the sun in my living room. However, for safety sake, I do use
welders goggles to feed the fish, and man, you should see my tan) and
sacrifice growth. Does this make sense or am I just being paranoid?
<Does make sense, but/and I assure you that the lower wattage is better
for your livestock and you... Watch out for melanoma!>
I am and will
be using AB 10k bulbs (IMHO best bulb on the market) with 03 actinic
supplementation when all is said and done. By the way, you guys are the
best. I read as much as I can and value your expertise. Rock on!
Scott B.
<Thank you. Bob Fenner>
Lighting
Hi WWM
Experts, <Hello, Chris>
I apologize for asking the type of question
you have probably been asked a million times.
I'm on the verge of
ordering lighting equipment from overseas (I live in South Africa) and
I'm a little scared to order the wrong things (which won't be so great
considering our exchange rate to the dollar !), so I was hoping you can
give me your insight on this. The dimensions of my new reef tank is
64"x24"x24", holding around 150gallons of water and I would like to keep
a mixture of soft and hard corals (we don't exactly have a wish list
yet). After doing a lot of reading on your site and in Mr. Fenner's book
I understand that I will need in the region of 3-5watts of lighting per
gallon for my setup, which gives me 450-750watts. My understanding is
that metal halide lights cover an area of about 2 feet with the 175W MH
ideal for tanks up to 20" deep and the 250W MH to about 30". So in my
mind the options are:
a) 3x175W
b) 3x250W
c) 2x250W
I
have 2 questions - 1. Am I on the right track here in choosing Metal
Halides? 2. Can you recommend one of the above 3 options, or perhaps
something completely different?
I'm leaning towards 3 x 175W plus a
couple of actinics, but it would really be great to have some input from
the experts here.
<Chris, for hard corals and the possibility of
clams, if the interest arises, I would go with the three 250 metal
halides, nothing lower. James (Salty Dog)>
Thanks again for all
your support.
Chris
Fluorescent to MH blues... too much heat,
vacillation in temperature in a SW 55
Hello all,
I just
purchased a new light for my 55 gallon reef tank. I went from a compact
fluorescent which was about 130watts total to a metal halide system. I
wanted to be able to get some of the cool corals. I already have a few
corals and they seemed to be doing alright with the other light but
figured they would love the new light. The new light is a Current USA
Outer Orbit fixture 48”. It has 1x150W 10K HQI-MH 1/ 2x130W Dual Actinic
& 6 Lunar Lights. I Have it mounted almost 13” over the tank. The
problem that I’m having is that the temperature in my tank has sky
rocketed. It’s usually 76-78 and since I have added the light it’s gone
up to 86 which I know is on the high end. The fish and the corals seem
to be doing alright but I don’t know what the long term effect will be.
I keep the AC in the house set at 70 and I still can’t get the
temperature down below 81. When the light comes on the temperature
climbs to 86 before the light goes out. Is the light too much for a 55
gallon tank?
<As it is, yes... you have too much thermal fluctuation
for health and safety's sakes>
I’ve looked into chillers and they're
so expensive. The light cost a fortune. Is there anything that I can do
to get the temperature down?
<A few things... evaporative cooling by
supplying fan/s to blow air across the surface would help... elevating
the light even more over the tank... adding more volume... in a BIG
sump/refugium elsewhere, that's tied in with the 55...>
What’s the
long term effect?
<Shortened life-spans for your livestock, big
electrical bills... all that goes along with these>
Set up is a 55
gallon tank set up in December 2004.
Filtration - Eheim Professional
II Canister filter up to 92 gallons.
Protein Skimmer - Aqua C Remora
with Mag Drive
Power heads - 2-600, 1 1200 Maxi Jet, 1 Zoo Med Power
sweep 228
Heating System - Hydor Eth 300 External Thermal heater
75 pounds of Fiji Live Rock,
60 LBS of Fiji Pink Aragonite Live
Sand.
Kent Marine Maxxima 35 Hi-S R/O / Deionizer 4 Stage Reverse
Osmosis Unit.
Current USA Outer Orbit Fixture – 48” 1x150W 10K
HQI-MH 1/ 2x130W Dual Actinic & 6 Lunar Lights
Inhabitants –
1.
Purple Tang
1. Blue Damsel
1. True & 1 False Percula
1.
Lawnmower Blenny
1. Dottyback Fridmani
1. Diamond Goby
1.
Branch Coral - Paralemnalia or Lemnalia Tree Corals, Finger Leather,
Branch, or Cauliflower Corals
1. Red Feather Star
1. Torch Coral
– (Brown) Large Polyp Stony
1. Red Star Fish
Misc. Hermit Crabs
Misc. Snails
<Bob Fenner>
Adding MH Lighting 2/5/04
Hello again! You guts are great. Thanks for the help in the past.
<Hi Jim. Glad you have benefited.>
I have a 120 gallon tank that is
4'x2'x2'. I currently have 700Watts between PC and VHO. I want to get
rid of the PC and change to a 250Watt 10K MH (I already have the MH).
The problem/concern that I have is that I currently have my lighting
under a hood. If the MH fixture can fit under the hood, will it be okay
to run with two 4'' fans for cooling?
<It should be, but it is hard
to guess. Depending on where you live, whether you run A/C in the
summer, use a chiller, photoperiod, etc., the fans may or may not be
enough to control heat.>
Will there be an issue with placing the
fixture on top of the glass cover?
<If you meant the glass aquarium
cover, yes. The heat from the lamp may dangerously overheat the glass
cover if it is too close. Also, most reef keepers don't run glass tank
covers because of the amount of light the block, even when clean.>
Another idea that I had was to remove the bulb from the fixture and
mount it to the top of the hood with a piece of sheet metal to deflect
the heat from the hood and still using the reflector. I would still use
the fans to cool the light, but I am not sure if this is a good idea.
Any other suggestions to improve lighting and still keep everything
under the hood?
<If your MH is contained in a pre-made fixture, I
would try to use the fixture as is. It should be at least a few inches
from the water surface to protect it from serious splashing. I would
consider cutting a hole (or other wise re-engineering the hood) and
recessing the fixture in the top of the hood before I would dismantle
the pre-made fixtures. Best Regards. Adam> Jim Martz Sr.
Metal Halide lighting
Hi Bob,
<Hi Larry.>
I'm up grading
my 30 gal reef tank to a 55 gallon. I currently have hard and soft
corals with a maxima clam. I am trying to decide on whether to use a
260 watt power compact light fixture or a hood with 2 -175 watt 6500K
metal halides and 2 actinic 20 watt fluorescent bulbs. My question is
how often do the MH's have to be replaced and are they more cost
effective in the long run.
<Halides, (with the exception of 20,000k
bulbs which are overdriven) on average, need to be replaced every 11-12
months. In the long run, halides are cheaper than fluorescent lighting.
Watt for watt, they cost the same to run than fluorescent lighting. Watt
for watt, halides emit the same amount of heat as fluorescent lighting
does. As an example, 400wts of halides would have the same heat as
400wts of powercompacts would.
<<Graham... not correct. The measure
of wattage is consumption of electricity... the heat generated is far
different. RMF>>
If you didn't already know, Metal halides
release all of their energy in one small area which is why halides often
seem hotter than fluorescent lighting. In the long run, halides can
often save you money.>
I like the shimmering effect of the MH's but
the initial cost is twice of the power compacts which will have 4- 65
watt bulbs, 2 -10,000k and 2 actinic. Also, if I go with the MH is
there any benefit with going with the 10,000K bulbs vs. the 6500K aside
from the whiter appearance.
<The 6,500k bulb will have slightly
more intensity, although overall, it won't make an extreme difference.>
I feel the mixture of the 6500K bulbs with the actinic blue would give a
nice appearance to the tank. I appreciate your input and your web site
which has been very helpful in the past. Thanks, Larry.
<I would
actually recommend you buy 2x 250wt halides than 2x 175wt halides. The
250wt bulbs will give you much more intensity and will allow you to keep
many more inhabitants, especially if they're going to be placed at the
bottom of the aquarium. The cost should be about the same as the 175wt
halides (of course, depending where you looked). However, Either choice
would be good. Take Care, Graham.>
HQI For The Mogul Guy
(Replacing Mogul Halides with HQI)
Hi all, got a few questions
and I know you guys are pros, so let the questions begin.
<Scott F.
at the ready today>
I recently upgraded my lighting on my reef
aquarium from 2 175 mogul base MH to 2 250 watt HQI bulbs, I plan on
venturing in to the world of stonies and clams pretty soon even thought
about an anemone to host my maroon clown... just needed assurance if
that set up would be considered bright lighting for a 75 gallon
aquarium...
<For most SPS corals and/or clams, that would be a pretty
bright lighting setup. For softies and some LPS corals, this could be
way too much!>
I was also reading and article, it stated that HQI
lighting is significantly brighter that the standard mogul base MH
lighting.
<Not so much "brighter". It's also a function of
efficiency...>
The reading indicated that a 250 watt HQI is close or
equal to a 400watt mogul base metal halide...is that true.
<In some
instances, yes- the PAR value of some 250 watt HQI bulbs in an efficient
reflector is equal to or greater than some 400 watt mogul bulbs>
Also, I just acquired a Condylactis anemone. He seems to be doing a lot
better, purchased from a LFS that had a tank full of them under 1 NO
light which I know is not enough light.
<It isn't!>
I was
wondering, if I decided to add a BTA, or even a nice Green Carpet would
chemical warfare be a problem.
<It very well could be. I highly
advise against mixing anemones in anything but the largest of systems.
The potential for problems is just too great, IMO>
From ya' boy
***Chris***
<Well, Cris- sounds like you're on the light track with
the lighting...Good luck with your animals! Regards, Scott F>
Lighting Design Dilemma!
Hey guys, I asked this question earlier
this week but never got a response. I thought I should resend it incase
it got lost in neverland. If you have it and are just busy or decided
not to answer because of more important questions out there, I
understand.
Regards,
Jason
PS. I forgot to mention in the
message that I was planning on using a DSB so the actual amount in the
water column would be about 16 inches. Maybe 175's would be enough?
<Hmm.. Don't know where it went- but I've got ya' now! Scott F. with you
today!>
My People,
I have ordered a custom tank and waiting on its
arrival to the LFS. It is 60 long, 24 front to back and 20 high (drilled
of course). To me, the front to back space is important. I feel you can
make some really nice aquascape with more surface area on the bottom.
<I agree! Tanks with wide front-to-back footprints are great to
aquascape>
Now, as soon as I receive my tank, I am going to start
building my stand. I have had this tank in the plans for about a year,
and still some time before its up and running but I'm not rushing
anything. For once, I want to do it right the 1st time.
<Excellent!>
I am planning on a enclosed canopy. I was sold on VHO but I think I can
swing MH lighting. I need to have my mind made up by the time I'm ready
to build the canopy because from what I have read is MH need to be 10-12
inches above water surface, whereas if I went with VHO, the canopy would
need to be shorter. I'm 80-20 sold on MH now though. I'm thinking about
2 250w MH with 3 actinic and 1 10k VHO to come on 2 hours before and 2
hours after MH's. Is this a bad idea?
<No- I think it's a great idea.
HQI halide pendants can give you great flexibility and efficiency, and
will work well in a canopy like this!>
In this configuration, what K
should the MH's be?
<Really depends on the needs of the animals that
you intend to keep, and your sense of aesthetics! I am partial to a more
"blue" look, so I use mainly 20,000k bulbs, but I have planned my animal
population around my preference. Most hobbyists seem to like a mix of
10000ks and actinic supplementing for more blue.>
Should I go with
175's? I have always wanted a Crocea Clam (and some SPS's) is why I am
doing this, if you were wondering....I will install fans or chiller if
needed.
<I'd go with 150watt HQI pendants. You will definitely need
fans in the canopy to provide cooling, and a chiller may not be a bad
idea>
Again, I want to do it right the 1st time. Any advice you can
provide will be most helpful. Seems the closer it gets to "go" time, the
more I think and plan and ultimately, get confused and undecided. ha-ha.
< Not an unusual occurrence, especially with lighting! I really feel
that, if you plan your lighting package around the needs of the animals
you intend to keep, you can't really go wrong>
On a totally side
note. I use formula one, Mysis, and Prime Reef foods.
<All excellent
foods>
I supplement with VitaChem, Selcon, and Garlic Extreme. I
squeeze the juice out of the food when it thaws then dose it with one of
the 3 supplements. Is this wrong? Am I squeezing out the "good stuff" or
just pollutants?
<If you give the food enough time for it to absorb
the supplements, you should be fine. Better yet, thaw and rinse the food
first, give it a little squeeze, and then soak with your supplement.>
Best Regards, Jason
<Glad to be of assistance! Scott F>
The
Right Light?
Dear Crew:
<Scott F. your Crew member today!>
Thanks again for the great website. I have read your FAQ's and articles
about MH lighting with great interest. Here is my situation: I
currently have a 55gal (48x13x20) tank w/130W PC's. I am going to get a
bigger tank this year, probably a 125 (72x18x22). I would like to keep
some clams & SPS, so I am looking at MH. Also, I believe HQI DE bulbs
and fixtures will give me the best for my money.
<I agree!>
Now,
according to Bob's response in one case, with "some" clams and SPS, I
should be able to go with 175W lamps. However, I have only seen HQI in
150W and 250W flavors. The difference in price is about $20, so it
would seem wise to get the 250W. However, I do not wish to have the
extra light if I do not need it. I could probably go with 2-150W lamps
for the 55 now, and get an extra one when I get the 150gal. I thought
about 2-150's and then the one 250 later, but I am not sure how I would
feel about the spotlight effect (I assume there will be one).
<With
well-designed pendants, such as Sunlight Supply's Reef Optix III's, or
the new PFO mini pendants, the "spotlight effect" that you refer to is
usually not noticeable. I use a mix of 150watt and 250 watt HQI pendants
over a 20" high tank, and have been quite pleased with the results. It's
never a bad idea to look into the 250 here. Clams do require intense
light, so at least one 250 would be nice to experiment with!>
Before
I forget; I know some of you don't like to say, but which would you pick
of the 2 choices I have for either 150W or 250W:
1) PFO HQI ballast,
Aqualine10K DE HQI Bulb and PFO HQI Mini Pendant *OR*
2) IceCap
Electronic HQI Ballast, Ushio or Aqualine (AB) 10K DE HQI Bulb and
Sunlight Supply Reef Optix III Plus Horizontal Reflector.
<I like #2,
and use this combo myself>
About choice #2, I have seen some vendors
insist that the Sunlight Supply Reflector must run with Blue Wave
Ballast. If this is true, what makes the IceCap okay in this case? Is
there some sort of overdriving or trickery going on here?
<Not true
at all. Myself and many of my reef nerd friends use the RO III/Ice Cap
combo with great results! I'm not sure if this is true or not, but
somebody "in the know" within the aquarium halide lighting market told
me that the Blue Wave ballast is essentially the Ice Cap in a different
housing...Again, I don't have any verification of this, but it may be
worth checking out>
Hey, thanks a million, Rich.
<My pleasure!
Regards, Scott F>
Lighting upgrade for Reef Aquarium 7/31/04
Dear crew, Anthony answered my original question a couple of months
back. First the background. I have a 120 gallon (48x24x24) FOWLR tank. I
want to start adding some corals. Based on Anthony's response and some
further research I did I was planning on upgrading my lighting to a pair
of 150watt DE HQI mini pendants. However now that I am ready to order I
have noticed that the price increase to go with the 250s instead of the
150s is not that large. I eventually would like to have a clam or two in
my tank and I imagine they would appreciate the extra light.
<depends on the clam species... but assuming you like the popular blue
crocea or maxima varieties (versus lower light Hippopus, or Tridacna
Squamosa or T. derasa types), then yes... a little extra light would be
nice>
What I wonder about though is how would my starter lower light
corals, like mushrooms, do under these lights?
<keep them in the
bottom third of the tank and perhaps add a few layers of plastic window
screen to the top of the tank (removing a sheet every few days until all
cloth is removed over a couple weeks for a slow acclimation to
new/bright light without having to alter photoperiod>
Would it be
too bright?
<not bad at all... you are still close to the average (5
watts per gallon) for reef tanks>
I plan to mount the lights 8"
above the water's surface and the low light corals would be at the
bottom of my 24" tank. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
<if you do 250 watt lights... you may want to go higher off the water...
9-12">
Regards, Matt
<kindly, Anthony>