Logo
Please visit our Sponsors

FAQs about Brachiopods, Lamp Shells

Related Articles: Marine Invertebrates, Quarantine of Corals and Invertebrates, Feeding Reef Invertebrates, Lighting Marine Invertebrates, Water Flow, How Much is Enough

Related FAQs: Marine Invert.s 1, Marine Invert.s 2, & FAQs about: Non-Vert IDs 1, Non-Vert IDs 2, Non-Vert IDs 3, ... Marine Invertebrate Behavior, Marine Invertebrate Compatibility, Marine Invertebrate Selection, Marine Invertebrate Systems, Feeding Reef Invertebrates, Marine Invertebrate Disease, Marine Invertebrate Reproduction& Marine Plankton

New critter for IDing 7/18/2010
Good Morning to you all. Bob, love the book!
I have found yet another critter last night with the flashlight. I believe it to be a bivalve but I want to be sure. I noticed on your website only a few photos
that look the similar as mine but I would like to be sure.
<This is unusual... as the opening of the apparent valves appears to be oriented to the surface (rather than away)>
He/she only appears to be active at night and very sensitive to light. The two sides of the shell open and a white foot protrudes. At the other end, a darker set of lips, for lack of a better word, open. It moves by latching the
foot forward and pulling the shell behind. He was spotted on my live rock.
He disappears during the day (light).
<Good clues>
I only have one other Flaming Clam in the tank and I hope I can keep this one if he is a healthy addition. Any idea if he will stay this size, about 1cm in length?
<Likely not to get much larger... I think what you have here is a Brachiopod>
Thanks again for you and your site!
Dayna Macdonald,
<Please see the Net re the group/phylum name... a rare find. Bob Fenner> 

 

Re: New critter for IDing 7/18/10
> Hi Bob,
> I don't think that's a brachiopod. Not if it moves. Apart from Lingula, I don't believe any of the modern species move.
<Mmm, most, not all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brachiopod>
It looks more like some sort of Arcidae to me, especially the flat surface across either sides of the gape.
> Cheers, Neale
<Thank you for this... do read again the querior's description... behaviorally this thing is moving by way of its "foot"... Arcids are immobile... B>

Re: New critter for IDing, and self-righting lily leaves 7/18/10
They may be mobile when juveniles, as "spat", and that's a very small one.
Brachs definitely do not move, not the articulate, epifaunal ones anyway. I'm certainly not an expert on them, but I have written one paper on Brachs, and spent my fourth year at university working on our native species, Terebratulina retusa, for my final year thesis. A very neat animal. Almost all shell, virtually no meat, and hence ignored by predators when they're given choices such as mussels and oysters. These were fun experiments to run, you'd have enjoyed them.
<Well... let's hope this querior sends in more, better-resolved/acute image work, input>
> The water lily leaves question was interesting too. I'm not convinced they are self-righting at all, beyond the tension of the stem pulling the underside downwards and the aerenchyma in the leaves pulling the leaf upwards via positive buoyancy.
<Actually... experience shows that these Nymphaeacean leaves are self-righting... by what mechanism/s I know naught>
I think the fact they aren't self-righting is precisely why water lilies occur only in still water habitats. In any case, aquarium specimens are always getting their leaves tangled up and upside down!
> Cheers, Neale
<And you, B>

Re: New critter for IDing 7/19/10
Thanks Bob,
Hello everyone!
<Dayna>
Sorry I only gave you one picture. I am attaching more now. I took your advise and went through the pages of images on the web for the Brachiopod. These images look pretty similar only the line pattern on its shell does not go all the way from one end to the other. It is also more of an oval shape. You are correct, the opening of the two sides was observed to be pointed to the surface. Perhaps with these additional pics you can confirm what it is and if it is a good or bad addition. I have searched every night since, but cannot find it
again.
Dayna
<Neale (who is a real paleontologist in the U.K.) thinks this is likely a true Gastropod, perhaps an Arcid... I'm still sticking with my guess as a Brachiopod... At any length, this organism is not harmful, deleterious to your system or livestock. Bob Fenner>
Re: Critter ID.  6/24/08 Hi, I wish I'd seen this query - I'd have nabbed it for sure! I saw something similar to this a couple of days ago while on the hunt for Tineke's mystery shell/slug/Rhodophyte combo. I'll see if I can't backtrack and find out what it is. -Lynn <Thank goodness... I swear I've seen, read about this sort of "bivalvish", footed, ambulatory marine life... but can't for the life o me wake up and smell da cacao and recall what the Dickens group it belongs to. Be chatting! B>

LOL Yep, I know what you mean. Now the trick for me is to remember where I saw the blasted thing! Take care, -Lynn <Know whatcha mean... Hey, where are my pants!? Will do. B> Critter ID: Bivalve Mystery - 6/24/08 Hi there, <Hi Carl, Lynn here this afternoon!> Firstly congratulations on the great site! <On behalf of Bob and the crew, thank you very much!> This is my first marine aquarium and your site has provided me with a great amount of information to help me on my way. <Excellent> I was wondering if you could help me identify this little chap which seems to have hitched a lift on my last batch of live rock. <Will sure try.> He's only a few millimeters in size and brown in colour, the main part of the (shell?) looks like a split seed casing out of which comes a small white worm. <Okay> It moves by basically attaching the (head?) end of the worm <The shape is reminiscent of a clam siphon.> ..to a rock or the glass and then dragging itself along. It seems to be around day and night and doesn't seem to be causing any problems in the tank. <That's always a plus!> Just curious as I've not been able to ID it. http://h7lwpw.blu.livefilestore.com/y1p4IDr1MtfX0zR2RucSIySuNcmVaXc7KuxbCiaLHGLht
FTkVWWLqzE8IFbeJTW3-OK_HeGwiouZZhJjzRoDIj7KA/Untitled-1.jpg?download <Okie doke. Is there any way you can get a higher resolution/more detailed photo of this little guy? If not, that's okay. Hopefully, together we can solve this mystery! When it comes to bivalved critters, the choices that come to mind are mollusks in the Class Pelecypoda/Bivalvia (clams and such), Ostracods ('seed shrimps'/Crustaceans), Brachiopods (aka 'lamp shells'), and Opisthobranch sea slugs in the Family Juliidae. Of these possibilities, the most mobile are the Ostracods and sea slugs. I think we can rule out Ostracods because they have multiple long hair-like antennae protruding from their shells instead of a single, thicker stalk/siphon (whatever that thing is in the photo). See this example of an Ostracod for comparison: http://www.friendsofwarnhamlnr.org.uk/images/pondlife/crustacea/ostracoda/cypris05.jpg Sea slugs in the genus Juliidae are also out because all have two obvious rhinophores/antennae on their heads. I don't see any on your creature and I think you would have noticed them had they been there. By the way, let me know if you take another look at your little guy and do indeed see rhinophores! In the meantime, please see these links for sea slug examples: http://www.seaslugforum.net/display.cfm?id=19650 http://www.seaslugforum.net/factsheet.cfm?base=julizebr . Now we're left with mollusks/bivalves and Brachiopods. Most live either attached to hard surfaces or buried in sediments. Although they're mostly sessile, they can and do move about when very young (before settling) and, if possible as an adult, when necessary. Brachiopods attach themselves to hard surfaces and anchor themselves in the sand by way of what's called a "pedicle" or stalk. Bivalve mollusks (except for scallops and such) use a muscular foot to move about/bury themselves in the substrate, while those that attach themselves to hard surfaces secrete byssal threads as holdfasts. Now that you have some of the general terms, please see the criteria listed below. Hopefully it will help narrow things down. By the way, if you have a magnifying glass somewhere, dig that puppy out and take a close look at your little critter. 1. Pedicle that emerges from a single hole on one side of the shell = Brachiopod. 2. Long, slender pedicle that emerges from what appears to be a hinged area (where the two shell halves meet) = Brachiopod. 3. A Muscular foot that emerges from the open side of two shell halves (not at the hinge) = bivalve/mollusk. 4. Shell with no pedicle hole + foot/siphon that can completely retract into shell = bivalve/Mollusc. 5. Once attached to a surface, the creature is able to pivot about on the stalk/holdfast = Brachiopod. Hopefully this helps! One thing I'd like to mention is that there may easily be other possibilities as well that I'm totally unfamiliar with! As is, I'm inclined to think that what you have is likely a very young bivalve (mollusk) of some sort trying to find a place to settle, rather than a Brachiopod. The reasoning behind this is mainly because the latter is less common. That and the fact that I can't come up with any other possibilities! Please see the following links for photos: Brachiopod (see pedicle): http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/CA25677D007DC87D/LUbyDesc/WPB-lamp_il/$File/lampshell_il.jpg Ostracods as well as a photo of a juvenile bivalve (bottom left): http://www.chucksaddiction.com/hitchpods.html > Many Thanks, Carl. <You're very welcome. Keep in touch --Lynn> Bob- I doubt that that is the animal's foot in the pic of the "bivalve." Could you and Lynn be thinking of "Lamp shells" (Brachiopoda)?  Best, Sara M.
<Dat's a right>

Oh, yeah. B.

Re: Bivalve mystery . 6/25/08 "Bob- I doubt that that is the animal's foot in the pic of the "bivalve." Could you and Lynn be thinking of "Lamp shells" (Brachiopoda)? Best, Sara M.<Dat's a right>" Hi Sara and Bob, Yes, a Brachiopod was most definitely one of the possibilities that came up. I'm hoping that Carl will be able to determine whether he has a mollusk or a Brachiopod by the placement, etc, of that slender appendage. It does indeed look more like a clam siphon or a Brachiopod pedicle to me than it does a mollusk foot, but after seeing Charles' photo of a juvenile clam/scallop at the link provided, I had to admit that the possibility was there (see the photo on the bottom left: http://www.chucksaddiction.com/hitchpods.html ) . That still looks like a foot to me because it's a bit broader at the base, but given the possibility of odd positioning with Carl's creature and a bit of a blurry photo?? I just don't know. I'd actually love for it to be a Brachiopod. Anyway, I'm hoping to hear back from Carl so that we can have this answered! Take care,
-Lynn



Become a Sponsor Features:
Daily FAQs FW Daily FAQs SW Pix of the Day FW Pix of the Day New On WWM
Helpful Links Hobbyist Forum Calendars Admin Index Cover Images
Featured Sponsors: