Featured
Sponsor:

Homepage
Webs
Freshwater Aquarium Articles/ FAQs
Marine Aquarium Articles/ FAQs
Planted Aquarium Articles/ FAQs
Pond Articles/ FAQs
Brackish Systems Articles/ FAQs
Aquatics Business Articles/FAQs
Aquatic Science Articles/FAQs
Features:
Daily FAQs
FW Daily FAQs
SW Pix of the Day
FW Pix of the Day
Conscientious Aquarist Magazine
New On WWM
Links
Hobbyist Forum bb.WetWebMedia
Ask the WWM Crew a Question
Calendars

Search Feature

Admin Index
Cover Images

FAQs on Oscar Identification 

Related Articles: Oscars, Neotropical Cichlids, African Cichlids, Dwarf South American Cichlids, Cichlid Fishes in General

Related FAQs: Oscars 1, Oscars 2, Oscar Selection, Oscar Compatibility, Oscar Behavior, Oscar Systems, Oscar Feeding, Oscar Disease/Health, Oscar Reproduction, Neotropical Cichlids 1, Cichlids of the World, Cichlid Systems, Cichlid Identification, Cichlid Behavior, Cichlid Compatibility, Cichlid Selection, Cichlid Feeding, Cichlid DiseaseCichlid Reproduction,

 

Re: Oscars - Are they hybrids?
Good morning.  I am wondering what "The Crew" thinks about the origin of the aquarium variety of Oscar.  I personally believe them to be hybrids.
<No, THE Oscar, Astronotus ocellatus used in the hobby and as food fishes are not hybrids (crosses between species)>
I replied to a post about cichlid hybrids on a forum (with what seems to be some pretty smart people) debating this very issue in order to perhaps stimulate some intellectual thinking.  The only posts I received however were, "You are wrong!  Oscars are not hybrids."  This is a direct quote of what I had written on the forum.  "Currently, there are three species of "Oscar", Astronotus crassipinnis, A. ocellatus, and A. orbiculatus.  However, back in 1831 when Agassiz discovered the Oscar,
<Described by Louis Agassiz in 1831>
there was only one species, Lobotes ocellatus.  All three species were believed to be this one species.  When these fish were imported, they were very hard to breed, taking years to reach maturity.  Florida fish farms (at that time basically importers) gathered large numbers of these Oscars, regardless of looks, and threw them in outdoor ponds to raise and breed.  Since they were all considered one species, there wasn't a problem with this.  This is how all of the aquarium strains came to be (red, tiger, silver, gold, albino, and long-finned)."
<Mmm, actually... have been in the hobby and business or ornamental aquatics a good long time (since the mid-1960's) and have visited fish farms (in the orient, this fish and its sport mutations are not bred commercially in the U.S.) and have seen the efforts at selective breeding to make these other varieties... sometimes easier to do starting with crosses... but am pretty sure these are all A. ocellatus>
Does this argument make any real sense?  Do I even have an argument?  What are your views on this?  I am hoping you can shed some light on this for me, so I will know whether to back down on this issue or perhaps push it a little further.  Thank you.
<Perhaps a trip to a large/college library and a search for literature on the species, its history. Please see here re: http://www.wetwebmedia.com/litsrchart.htm
Karyotyping ("chromosome mapping") work has likely been done on this "species-complex" that will reveal if the current animal in use is just one or a mix of species.
Press on my friend. Bob Fenner>
- Jason Seymour

 

Featured Sponsors:

Google

 

Web

www.WetWebMedia.com

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More