
|
|
FAQs on Calcium and Alkalinity in Seawater, Sources
Related Articles: Calcium and Alkalinity
Explained by Anthony Calfo,
Calcium, Biominerals,
The Use of Kalkwasser by Russell Schultz,
Calcium Reactors,
Marine Maintenance, Marine Water
Quality, Magnesium in Seawater,
Strontium in Seawater, pH, Alkalinity,
Marine Alkalinity, Live Sand,
Marine Substrates, Reef
Systems,
Refugiums, Related FAQs:
Ca/Alk 1, Ca/Alk 2,
Ca/Alk 3, & FAQs on: The Science of
Calcium & Alkalinity, Importance,
Measure, Use of Additives, Troubleshooting/Fixing,
Products, &
Calcium, &
FAQs on Calcium:
Rationale/Use, Calcium Measuring/Test
Kits, Sources of Calcium,
Calcium Supplements, Dosing,
Chemical/Physical Interactions,
Troubleshooting/Fixing, &
Calcium Reactors, & FAQs on Calcium Reactors:
Rationale/Use, Selection,
Installation, Operation,
Media, Measuring,
Trouble-Shooting, By Makes/Models,
& pH, Alkalinity,
Marine Alkalinity, Marine Alkalinity 2,
Marine Alkalinity 3, Marine
Supplements 1, |
Inputs: Mmm, substrates (rock and sand), synthetic (and natural to a
smaller extent) sea salt, supplements of several sorts (Kalkwasser,
commercial prep.s, foods/feeding, calcium and other reactors,
Outputs: precipitation/chemical interactions (sped up with low pH),
biomineralizing life, |
calcite/Corosex 9/15/08 This is more of a
comment than a question, but.... I was experiencing high ALK (16/17)
with about 450 ppm calcium. Much of the written material indicated this
was not a likely pairing of conditions. The root cause was that I have
an acid neutralizer bed for my well water system that has a mixture of
calcite/Corosex (calcium carbonate and magnesium oxide) such that the
salt water as mixed was 16/17. I believe in these mixed neutralizer
systems the magnesium oxide is the more soluble material. Using DI water
solved this such that the makeup water is now more like 12 dKH and it
should dilute over time. I haven't been tracking my magnesium level, but
it is likely high. <Agreed. Hopefully within ratio. Bob Fenner>
High Calcium & Alk Hello & Good Day! <Good day to you> I’ve
read all through the Calcium and Alk FAQs and they’ve added to my
confusion. Here’s the scenario; Tank is 75gal with 75lbs LR and
DSB. Tank completed it’s cycle 10days ago. Since then I’ve added 2
dozen snails and 1 dozen hermits over the course of seven days. A few
days ago I decided to start testing Calcium and Alk to see where I stood
and to make sure my Coralline was going to do well. Day 1 of testing
Calcium / Alk in main tank = Cal 210, Alk 11.5 So I added some Tropic
Marin Bio-Calcium. “Contents are calcium ions, hydrogen carbonate and
all 70 trace elements found in natural sea water.” Day 2 of testing
Calcium / Alk in main tank = Cal 300, Alk 13.8 tested Replacement
Water ( 10gals ) = Cal 270, Alk 9.9 Added Tropic Marin to both. Day
3 ( Today ) of testing Calcium / Alk in main tank = Cal 315, Alk 15
tested Replacement Water = Cal 255, Alk 12.2 …So… I –thought- that
as one raised the other would lower but it actually looks like both are
rising in my main tank. I’m adding the Tropic Marin as directed but now
that my Alk is out of the recommended range I’m leery of adding anymore.
<The Tropic Marin could be raising both.> What should I do? Wait a
couple days and test again? Use a product to lower Alk? If so,
what? I’d like to start placing some actual fish in the system but not
until I can understand and handle what I’ve bitten off so far. Thanks
for your time! Scott <I would start by doing several large water
changes (25%-50%) over the next 7 to 10 days, without adding
supplements. This should dilute the imbalance. Then resume
supplementation with a 2part calcium supplement, Tropic Marin, or
Kalk. Best Regards, Gage> Smooth sailing on Ca & ALK? 5/5/03
What is your take on this? For months I used two part b-ionic with good
success in my 29 gallon reef tank. (Prior to that, for a couple of
years, I tried the balancing act of adding calcium and buffer
separately.) Anyway, out of the clear blue sky, I have found the
calcium and PH levels staying extremely stable and I have stopped adding
the bionic. (Will continue to monitor of course.) <Hmmm... you
haven't mentioned you ALK (hardness dKH) and I wonder if your test kits
are accurate (over 6 months old for reagents?). Before you stop any
crucial supplementation... please confirm you water quality on other
test kits for reference> The tank is skimmed, strong circulation,
constant small water changes, live rock/sand and the best husbandry
possible. (Bordering on obsessive.) No supplemental additives. only
corals are corallimorphs, no algae. light fish load, no problems
whatsoever. Could this be the reasons the tank stabilized?
<perhaps... simply a low demand/bio-load> Thanks for the input.
William <best regards, Anthony> - Ca/dKH Questions -
Dear WWW Crew, <Greetings, JasonC here...> Thanks for your advice
in the past and the great web site. I have looked through all of the
calcium FAQ's and am unsure how to proceed with my own reef. I have a
4 year old 75 gal reef with 80lb live rock and a 30 gal refugium with a
7 in DSB. I have several LPS corals and a variety of soft corals with a
few small fish. The corals are doing very well (I've divided my frog
spawn several times). I have a Turboflotor 1000 skimmer and a Korallin
calcium reactor. I do 5 gal water changes monthly and top up water with
a "NURCE" device using buffered R/O water. My chemistries are pH 8.3
(day)/ 8.0 (night), dKH 9.0, Ca 400, Mg 1300, nitrite/ammonia/nitrate 0.
Since getting the Ca reactor the Ca/dKH have been much more stable
(compared to chasing levels with supplements alone) but NOT optimal-Ca
325 and dKH 8. To boost this up I use Kent Super buffer 4 tsp. every 4
days and add Kent turbo Ca to the make up water (~3/4 tsp. per day).
I have tried Kalkwasser repeatedly in the past with unimpressive
results. In addition I frequently work over night and cannot dose stuff
when the lights go out very often. This winter I tried 3 months of
Warner's 2 part buffer and had o.k. results (Ca 400, dKH 8.5) but needed
to use maximum amounts (estimated to cost >$300/year). I am concerned
about my calcium and alkalinity supplementation. I have noticed some bad
mouthing of the Kent products in the FAQs...any specific problems?
<Well, in most cases they are the great imitators... copied products
from other companies that did the actually research.> Will this amount
of Turbo Calcium cause an ionic imbalance and how do I recognize the
symptoms? <One or the other [ph/dKH] will be very high, much higher than
they are now.> What Ca reactor media do you like the best? <Knop
Korallith.> How would you recommend I proceed? <I would consider two
things... first, unless you've done this already, you should replace at
least half of your live rock and sand bed. This is a process that should
be done once a year in smaller percentages, but I get the feeling you've
never done this... your alkaline reserve is really embodied in your sand
bed and live rock, and over time it gets used up. Adding supplements is
only useful to the point that they actually have a place to go. Also, if
you don't run your refugium this way, pack it with macro-algae and light
it during times when the tank is dark - this would help keep your pH a
little higher and also allow you to turn up the calcium reactor a little
bit. Do start with swapping out some rock and sand - this is the best
place to start.> Thank you for your response...you guys do a great
job! Sean <Cheers, J -- > - Ca & Alk, Calcium Reactor -
Hello again and thanks for all the past help. My system has been running
at pH 8.2, Ca 320ppm and Alk 10-11dKH since installing calcium reactor
three months ago. I have tried to increase Ca by increasing bubble count
to 120/min (started at 60) while keeping flow constant at manufacture's
recommended starting point of 2-3l/hr. Effluent is close to ph 6.5 and
40 dKH. Trend seems to be that as I increase bubble count, alk increases
but not Ca. I understand that Ca is necessarily lower when alk is high.
Is this just a function of reactor media (ARM) and will I have to
supplement Ca or will I eventually be able to dial in Ca to 350-400ppm
with the right combination of CO2 and flow. <Well, two things come to
mind - first, the ARM media is notoriously impure, which means you
really can't rely on it for consistent results. Second, calcium reactors
are 'really' alkalinity reactors, and by boosting alkalinity promote
better availability of calcium - of course it helps that the effluent is
calcium carbonate, but really, I don't see anything wrong with those
numbers. Do also use the growth of your calcium consuming organisms as a
guide.> Perhaps I need different media (suggestions?), <Knop Korallith.>
or is 320ppm & 11dKH just fine and I should leave it alone? <Yes to that
as well.> A. yongei frag is doing well so far but want to get everything
right before starting to stock in earnest. Regards, George. <Cheers,
J -- >
|
|