
|
|
FAQs about Caulerpa Algae Non/Selection
Related Articles: Caulerpa Algae,
Embracing Biodiversity, Green Algae By Mark E. Evans,
Green Algae, Avoiding Algae
Problems in Marine System,
Algae Control,
Marine Maintenance, Nutrient
Control and Export, Marine Scavengers,
Snails,
Hermit Crabs,
Mithrax/Emerald Green Crabs, Sea Urchins,
Blennies, Algae Filters,
Ctenochaetus/Bristle Mouth Tangs,
Zebrasoma/Sailfin Tangs, Skimmers,
Skimmer Selection, Marine Algae,
Coralline Algae, Green Algae,
Brown Algae, Blue-Green
"Algae"/(Cyanobacteria), Diatoms,
Brown Algae, Related FAQs:
Caulerpa Algae 1, Caulerpa 2,
Caulerpa 3, Caulerpa 4,
Caulerpa 5, Caulerpa Identification,
Caulerpa Behavior, Caulerpa
Compatibility/Control, Caulerpa
Systems, Caulerpa Nutrition,
Caulerpa Disease, Caulerpa
Reproduction/Propagation, Other Green
Algae, Refugiums, Green
Algae Control 1, Marine Algae ID 1,
Marine Algae ID 2, Marine Algae
Control FAQs II, Marine Algaecide
Use, Nutrient Limitation,
Marine Algae Eaters, Culturing
Macro-Algae; Controlling:
BGA/Cyano, Red/Encrusting
Algae, Green Algae,
Brown/Diatom Algae, | .JPG)
Even herbivorous fishes may eschew chewing Caulerpa spp.
|
Caulerpas & Copper? Which is better for a holding system.
7/1/2009
Hello,
<Hi Matthew.>
I am in the process of reconstructing & redesigning my fish holding
system.. It's a 150 gallons total system volume. Reasons for redesign
are:
reinforcement of the stand with 2x4's, problem of high nitrates,
insufficient space in the sump for a bigger better skimmer, and lastly
overflow capacity when power shuts down was not enough.
<OK.>
I have ordered up modifications to my original sump to accommodate the
new skimmer and have enough capacity for draining when/if power goes off
and also space to put Fiji mud and possibly Caulerpas to export
nitrates/phosphates and have healthier water for my fish.
<Sounds good.>
I have come across the debate of whether or not I will be running
Caulerpas without copper or copper without Caulerpas. If I use copper, I
will have the problem of slowly increasing nitrates without my Caulerpa
and large water changes with constant adjustments using copper. I was
told copper will kill the Caulerpa yes?
<Copper will kill any algae and invertebrate, essentially negating the
refugium you just set up.>
Previously a Aqua UV sterilizer was being used, but after dismantling it
I took a peak inside and saw how resinous the glass tube had become and
realized its ineffectiveness against zapping pathogens.
<They do require regular maintenance to keep the inner sleeve clean.
Should be cleaned every two weeks or so.>
Being that the U.V. requires so much maintenance, I think this time I
will not incorporate it since copper sounds more effective.
<Long term exposure to cooper is not good for fish either..>
If I don't use copper, my tank is not protected against ich/velvet but I
will be able to keep nitrates very low.
<You can control Crypt and velvet using good quarantine and dipping
procedures.>
Which method would you go with,
<Algae and refugium along with quarantine.>
Any suggestions for the long term success of this holding system are
appreciated.
<Read here:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/nitratesmar.htm
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/dips_baths.htm
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/cutrbfix.htm >
Thanks,
Matthew
<MikeV>
Re: Caulerpas & Copper? Which is better for a holding system.
7/2/2009
<Hi Matthew.>
Sounds good, another person I know in the service biz recommended the
same thing, Caulerpas and U.V.
I guess a 10 or 20 gal tank could be used to isolate and treat extreme
cases with copper and freshwater dips.
<Yes.>
One more thing, how much more susceptible do fish become to ich/velvet
when nitrate concentrations are 50ppm and above?
<The water quality is poor at that level, which could stress the fish
and make them more susceptible.>
Thanks,
-Matthew
<MikeV>
Re: Caulerpa Chaetomorpha: The Best Macroalgae for a Refugium?
9/22/08 Many thanks for your advice, Scott <My pleasure!>
Is Chaetomorpha the dark green, stringy stuff, that looks a bit like
spaghetti? <It sure does...Actually, to me it looks like one of
those pot scrubber things, but spaghetti is not that far off the mark.>
If so, then that's not a problem, I got some of that too! Had no
idea you could use this in a refugium though. <Yep- Chaetomorpha is
an excellent macroalgae for nutrient export, with none of the potential
bad effects of Caulerpa. It is also a good "substrate" for creatures
like amphipods to grow on, so it has other positive attributes, too!>
Great stuff, thanks again. <Glad to help! Regards, Scott F.>
Caulerpa verticillata; sel., beh. 12/20/07 Hi team,
<Dave> I have Caulerpa Verticillata growing in my refugium. I have
looked amongst all the algae and Caulerpa faqs but can't determine an
answer to my question. Can you tell me whether this variety is likely
to go sexual, and whether therefore, I should keep my lights on 24/7
(currently operating 14 hours per day RDP) to prevent this event?
Cheers Dave <Mmm, no more than the other Caulerpa spp. commonly
utilized by aquarists... Better by far to be very regular re harvesting,
extracting, thinning bits... via their "rhizomes"... per what is posted
on WWM. Bob Fenner>
C. taxifolia, hysteria test – 07/08/07 Hi there, I was
referred to your site regarding C. taxifolia. <Okay...> You state
that it is possibly the best for home aquarium use. It possibly is, but,
it is the most invasive plant in the world, it is outlawed in many
countries because of its horrific reproduction and its ability to escape
and enter waterways and destroy them. <... along with?> A 1mm
piece that escape will cause wide spread disaster. <Call in the
government... they'll save you... Not> Many people use your site, and
as I have looked at it I agree it is most informative, I ask of you to
do a little research on taxifolia and possibly warn people against its
use rather than its use. It is truly an environmental disaster
waiting to happen. Carpe diem <Seize the carp?> Cheers, David
<Release nothing to the wild... RMF>
Re: C. taxifolia 7/10/07 Sounds like you really don't care.
Means sieze the moment. <Nihil agis, nihil moliris, nihil
cogitas, quod non ego non modo audiam, sed etiam videam planeque
sentiam.... Don't stay ignorant your
whole life. B> Carpe diem Cheers, David
Re: C. taxifolia– 7/10/07 I don't understand, I am a commercial
aquaculturist, and let you know of what I and most countries around the
world to be a huge threat, and yet you resolve to sarcasm. <Mmm, the
better part of valor?> Have a look at what happened to West Lakes in
South Australia, and many other places around the world, and then tell
me that your site promoting taxifolia is correct. Carpe diem
Cheers, David <I have an advanced degree in fisheries... and am
well-aware of the threat... The family is banned in our State
(California)... we/WWM run a public service announcement, have links to
agencies that warn folks re release... And I do apologize if ALL I'm
coming off is as sarcastic... I would like to begin again as it were,
and posit that humans are the greatest scourge on this planet... that
their numbers and distribution should be severely curtailed... that they
not be allowed to reproduce willy nilly, out of hand... After all, it's
not the Caulerpaceans that are "getting around" but the human vectors
responsible. Big government and apathetic, hysteria/faith/dogma driven
populaces are much more of a threat to the environment... Let's see,
what to finish up with this time...? I call on you to not have
children. BobF>
Re: C. taxifolia– 7/10/07 Ok Bob, you win, I try for learned
discussion, you go for sarcasm. Sweet, be well. <Ubi dubi ex
flagellatum... Where in doubt, I whip it out... It's a free for all.
TedN> Carpe diem Cheers, David
Re: C. taxifolia– 7/10/07 Carpe diem Cheers, David <Duke,
duke, duke, duke of earl, duke, duke, duke of earl... (words from Idi
Amin as he's leaving the gang plank... "Let's see, cut your head off at
noon"...) duke of earl... As I go through this world, no one can touch
the duke of earl... and you, you are my girl... and I... oh my... Oh
my..... Ooooh oohh, oh oh... >
Keep Caulerpa In My
Display? - 02/14/07 Hello, <<Howdy>> I recently set up a
90-gallon reef aquarium, 1 week ago to be exact. <<I see>> My
tank has a mix of Marshall Island LR and Tonga Kalani, and Tonga branch
rock, and about a 2" aragonite sand bed that rises to three-inches in
the rear of the display. The rock was hand picked by myself and put in
curing vats for 5 weeks with heavy circulation, a turnover rate of 14x
an hour and heavy protein skimming. <<Excellent>> The
display has no trace of ammonia, nitrites, or nitrates. No
Phosphates, calcium is at 450, dKH is at 12, <<Mmm, pushing the
upper limits in both cases...I would let one of these fall a bit>>
aquarium temperature is kept between 78 and 80 degrees Fahrenheit. The
lighting system on this 90-gal tank (48 x 18 x 24) is 2 x 250 watt 14K
metal halides that run 8-hrs daily and 2 x 96-watt power compacts 7100K
that run 12-hrs daily. I also run 4-watts white moonlighting on this
tank every night. The lighting system is fully automated and the tank
for all intent and purposes is running very smooth, there is quite a bit
of life already stirring in it. <<Very good>> My big question
for you now that you know most of the info on this aquarium is; On
the Marshall Island live rock there are a lot of sprouts of what appear
to be Caulerpa sertularoides, or Caulerpa taxifolia, the only other
photo on Wet Web Media that I saw that resembled what I have is Caulerpa
mexicana but I have a feeling it's one of the two previously mentioned.
<<Ok>> I plan on keeping SPS corals in this aquarium and I am
worried this particular algae growth might become a problem. <<So am
I>> Should it be left alone in the aquarium to grow and be pruned?
<<Algae compete for space on the reef just as all the other
organisms. The Caulerpa species can be particularly
aggressive/noxious...exuding growth limiting compounds and growing
rapidly to the point of overgrowing sessile invertebrates. Once
established it can be a nightmare to eradicate through manual extraction
and finding reliable biological solutions/predators can be difficult due
to its noxious nature...I would take steps to stop its growth in the
display if this were my tank>> It isn't terrible looking stuff. Or
should I strike now while it is in its infancy? <<Is what I think,
yes>> Any advice you have on this dilemma would be greatly
appreciated. Thank you for your time. Brian Crenshaw <<Quite
welcome. Eric Russell>> Ongoing... sand... Now, Caulerpa, other
algae comp. 2/14/07 Bob, Thank you for responding
so quickly. <Always include prev. corr. pls> I will do something
about that sand bed. I had a couple more questions for you regarding the
same tank and algae. Is there another type of algae that resembles the
structure of feather Caulerpa, perhaps one indigenous to Marshall
island? <A few...> You mentioned engaging bio-warfare, using
what? <Chemicals... akin to terrestrial plants... interfering with
the germination, growth of others near, under them...> I am going to
put a large yellow tang in this aquarium, would it be able to take care
of the algae without negative affects? <Likely to some degree...
depends on the species of algae (some are unpalatable to noxious...) and
the particular Yellow Tang... what else it has to eat...> I am also
putting in 10 Nerite snails, 10 Trochus snails, and 10 blue leg hermit
crabs. I read somewhere that Caulerpa algae is fairly toxic to
the animals that ingest it, <Some species, varieties... there are
such properties in many other algae, species...> so I want to make
sure that I take care of it before I stock the tank with animals that
might be hurt as a result of nibbling. Right now the algae is only on
one rock in the aquarium, and of course the one rock is my favorite
one! Murphy's law in effect! I am hoping I won't have to remove
the rock entirely from the display, it has a lot of other wonderful
"Critters" on it as well. Thanks again, Brian Crenshaw <I
would not be concerned at this juncture. BobF>
Caulerpa algae sel. 1/27/07 Im attaching a pic of the
Caulerpa live stone Hi there <Hola Hector> Im starting
in the reef aquarium hobby, y have a fairly good system and some
friend sells me some live rock with Caulerpa algae on it. I've
been reading about it, some people thinks it's like a pest that can
infest your system, and some others says its helps to keep good
quality water. <Tambien es posible> would you in your system
seed Caulerpa, yes or no and why. <Leas por favor aqui:
http://wetwebmedia.com/caulerpaalg.htm and the linked paginas
mas alta> Regards and thanks for helping (its clear my mother
language is not English) <No worries. Bob Fenner> | 
|
Genus name Caulerpa confusing... like this title. Seahorse tank use
12/31/06 I am wondering if I could impose on you to clarify a
seemingly endless argument on the use of Caulerpa prolifera. Often I
read about Caulerpa pros and cons. It seems there are several
suggestions that Caulerpa prolifera is great for a seahorse tank.
<Mmm... remember the ancient Egyptian measure or moderation, "Ma'at"...>
I remember reading that they have a slime that can be problematic to
ponies. <Yes> I have been setting up a sea horse tank attached
to my reef tank. I have Caulerpa prolifera in my sump and tons and tons
of organisms. Can I use the prolifera in the seahorse tank? thanks
for any info you can offer Cathy <I would seek out other algae
to use here, OR be careful to keep this species of Caulerpa trimmed back
(weekly) to just a few strands. Bob Fenner>
Macroalgae In The
Mix! WWM: <Scott F. at the keyboard this evening> I’ve been
reading through your FAQs on the Ecosystem Mud filter approach. Since
these are not dated, I can’t tell what is the most current line of
thinking, but did note that there seems to be mixed feelings on this
even among your staff. That’s fine and perfectly understandable.
<Good, 'cause we do all have different opinions based upon our own
experiences, which gives our fellow hobbyists an honest point of view.>
New information comes along all the time. Can you give me an update on
the following questions: <Will try!> 1. I see a lot of conflicting
info on use of Caulerpa. Toxicity, etc. Is it still recommended?
<Caulerpa is a great macroalgae that is prolific, easy to care for, and
good at exporting nutrients if carefully harvested on a regular basis.
Nothing is new here...It is prone to "go sexual" and release its
cellular material into the water under the right circumstances, and some
also theorize that it may produce substances which are potentially toxic
to some corals. I prefer more "benign" macroalgae, such as Chaetomorpha.
In addition, it is actually illegal to keep in some areas, such as
Southern California, where it has been released into the wild, to great
disdain.> <Editor's note: Under State law (Assembly Bill 1334),
the sale, possession, and transport of Caulerpa taxifolia was prohibited
throughout California in September 2001. Please see here:
http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb9/programs/caulerpa/caulerpa.html >
2. Is it okay to use a micron sock and prefilter sponge with this
system? Do these remove the desirable critters? <In my opinion, using
these filter socks is fine; you just need to clean them very frequently.
Yes, it is certainly possible that some desirable organisms will be
removed by such mechanical filtration, but I believe that the benefits
of these "socks" far outweigh any disadvantages, as long as you pay
attention to very frequent maintenance.> 3. Is 24 hour photoperiod
still recommended? Noted FAQ that Anthony answered where he pointed out
possible sexual crash, but then I also understand this is key to claim
of keeping pH and oxygen levels more stable. <I have employed a 24
hour cycle with macroalgae with good results, but a "reverse daylight"
(i.e. light the macroalgae when the display is dark). In actuality, the
"reverse" daylight technique is a more natural system; I don't think
that keeping macroalgae in "stasis" is really natural> 4. I see
a some refugiums that don’t use the ‘Mud’. They sometimes also use live
rock in the sump w or w/o the algae. In these cases, is the 24 hour
photoperiod detrimental to the live rock? <Well, it could be
disruptive to the organisms which inhabit the rock, but the bacterial
processes are probably unaffected.> 5. Are the bioballs that
ecosystems recommends necessary? Will these become a maintenance issue
down the road? <I don't think that they will become problematic. From
my understanding, these are actually used to keep debris from the
macroalgae from escaping the sump.> If you’ll indulge me on one more
issue I’m struggling with: I’m trying to choose my aquarium size and
have option of 18”, 24”, or 30” height. I like the look of the 30”
height, but understand that it will drive the lighting requirements. I
haven’t seen any quantitative numbers on this though. Is there a formula
for determining difference in lighting level required to achieve same
intensity as a function of water depth? <Good question. I'm sure that
there are certainly some highly scientific studies on this, and some
applications of the inverse square law and other principles that can
apply. However, I am a simple guy and I like to keep things
well...simple. Here's my take on it: I tend to favor the 24" high tank,
because you can still utilize 175 to 250 watt halides for most corals.
In a 30" high tank, conventional wisdom is that you will need 400 watt
halides. This is not "scientific"; merely based upon the work of
hobbyists and personal experiences. Of course, there are many hardcore
reefers who believe that you need such intense lights even in 14" tanks!
I guess it all adds up to the fact that there are no right or wrong
answers to every situation. You just need to assess the needs of your
animals and take it from there!> Thanks for your help. Bob. <Glad
to be of service, Bob! Regards, Scott F.> Caulerpa addenda
Hi Scott, All, You answered a query regarding the use of Caulerpa,
and mentioned that it is illegal in SoCal. I have taken the liberty of
adding an editor's note regarding the legality of, specifically, C.
taxifolia in the state, with link provided. I hope I haven't stepped on
any toes, but I felt that it's important for people to be aware of this,
because many of our archives do date previous to September '01 and I'd
like to help ensure we don't encounter any legal issues regarding any
advice to use Caulerpa spp. Call it "COA" (kind of like CYA, but
covering more butts). If it's preferred, I will remove the notation.
Marina <Well done Mar. BobF> Caulerpa keeping ...
the good side ! Hey guys it's Klay from N.Z. .... <Hello
from not-so-sunny Southern California... where Caulerpaceans are
outright banned, sigh, as "noxious potential weeds"> regarding
comments about Caulerpa pro's and con's .... thru my various trials with
this and native sea weeds ( macro algae's for the purist ! ) ... I have
found that running an actinic 24/7 as a night light helps stop the
dreaded spawning/self destruction that plagues reef garden tanks ,
<Good> this is based on 8 months of trial. ( and error).
<Heeee!> ,1st system... 1 tank ( 3 ft) 200 ltr with usual lighting (
2 x actinic, 2 x full spec, 12 hours .... plus 1 x 14000 k halide, 6
hours ) ...( invert tank , soft/stony corals (11 species), hermits,
conch's , cowries, urchins , starfish ( 5 types) ,tritons, banded
shrimp, 5 x cleaner shrimps , whelks , Turbos ( and odd snails cant find
I.D's for) + numerous micro life forms...fish being mandarin , scooter,
"who are bluddy fat" , percula x 2 , flame, ( 4 x Caulerpa spec..
mexicana , grape , + ?? , buttercup) ... filtration .. side overflow
thru media back to tank , no "skimmer" ( I know, but this is a natural
system of sorts based on live rock etc.)... monthly water change of 60
ltrs ( 30 %) no additives!. <Okay> 2nd system ... 3 tanks 4 ft
350 ltr running (each) 1 x actinic , 24 hours , 1 x full spec , 12 hours
)........ ) ditto above plus used as seeding tanks for live rock
.......... filtration , all connected to main overflow to sump " no
skimmer" ..live rock "filter", debris trap for organic feeders (
another type of natural system using NZ native species 4 filters !! )
will explain if needed.... you'll be surprised.! ;) <Looking forward
to it> 3rd system ... 1 x 3 ft 240 ltr ( 1 x actinic ( 24 hours ) ,
1 x full spec ( 12 hours) , 1 x14000 halide ( 4 hours ) + 3 hours full
sunlight .... ( 1 x Malu anemone 13 " dia ... 2 Clarks clowns, blue
tang , leopard wrasse , 8 soft/stony corals , 4 x Caulerpa spec's .. )
... filtration enclosed system ( 3 x powerheads , 1 x " box filter
,absorbent packed " ... weekly water change of 50 % ( 120 ltr )...
no additives!. ( planned Jaubert system for this one ). results
........ introduced 4 x Caulerpa to tank system 2 .... month later
handfuls of "cuttings" ( pinching edges ) to other tanks
... system 1 , experienced periodic spawning/die off of donored
colonies ... grape sp. all gone...overall ,average life span! ...
red algae( macro) showed lightening of edges but still showed
accelerated growth. .... system 2 , massive growth ( water quality
++ ) , gave away numerous " cuttings" ( no die off ). ... system
3 , massive growth ( to the point it was pissing off the anemone ) ..
same as system 2 .. red algae same as system 1 this is by no way a
scientific research , just a result of a layman playing around with
macro algae's , my conclusions are that as long as there is light in the
tank 24/7 Caulerpa will refrain from the " die off " plus with a very
healthily growth ( read forest) the water quality is kept good ... only
a guess but all debris+ organic nutrients helping macro along !?
<Yes, likely so> ........ plan to morph all tanks into one 8 ft
system using a combination of Jaubert with separate refugium ( so to
restart after toxic gas build up ... sulphur blah blah )... minimal fish
, heaps of inverts ( as they are more interesting and not
mainstream, then lets see the forest turn into the jungle. hope
this helps the novice/average aquaculturist/aquarist with some
alternative info !? .... no responsibilities for said info thou. ... I'm
sure there will be others who have played with these " nasty" weeds and
have different conclusions and will dispute my findings , but , hey
! good onya , I think they look so damn good in a reef tank that they
deserve a better cred........ anyway cheers Klay. <Thank you for
your input. Bob Fenner, one of the remaining "pro-Caulerpa" types>
Caulerpa Suitability 8/9/05 Hi guys! Thank you for your helpful
FAQs, you guys have done a great job. I have a 2x1x1 feet tank, protein
skimmed, aeration pumps, undergravel filters, cooling fan and live
rocks. I have 2 feather dusters, 4 diff. clown species, 1 domino and 1
yellow tail damsel. All of them are small and doing fine. The lighting
is a bit confusing because I place the aquarium outdoors under a shade
where there's no direct sunlight but still the daylights outshined my
220 watts twin fluorescents (white and blue actinic). Is this ok if I
take in polyps into the sys.? <If you are talking about Zoanthids,
then yes. I wish we could all use natural sunlight!> I'm thinking
off adding Caulerpa (grape) so as to help with the heavy bioload besides
adding color and oxygenating the system. Do you think it will work? <I
would not recommend adding Caulerpa to the display. It is fine in a
separate sump or refugium, but there are many problems with placing it
in the display. First, it will likely overgrow all of your rock. This
is only a problem if you find it unattractive. Second, it only
oxygenates the water during the day. At night, it consumes oxygen and
could actually deplete oxygen at night. Last, if you plan to add polyps
or other corals, the Caulerpa will probably overgrow them and the
chemicals produced by the Caulerpa may inhibit their growth. If you can
add the Caulerpa to a connected tank where it can be controlled, this
may be a better option. This also allows it to be lighted at night so
that it is producing oxygen when the display is not and vice versa.>
How do I place them (i.e: aeration, lighting, depths, substrate burial)?
Lastly, what would I feed them with? Thank you in advance. Sam
(Malaysia) <Simply dropping some fronds of Caulerpa into the tank will
usually get them established and no special care is required. Best
Regards. AdamC.>
Caulerpa/Cyano in refugium 11/16/05
Hi Crew, For a group of volunteer experts, you guys should be commended
for keeping this site so informative and assisting more novices to
succeed. <Glad you have found the site helpful!> Parameters: 250
gal. FOWLR with large wet/dry, refugium with live rock rubble/Caulerpa,
protein skimmer (producing lots of daily skimmate), 40 watt UV
sterilizer, trickle filter box with media pad, activated carbon, and
PhosBan. Main display has ~250 lbs. of Tonga live rock, live fine
aragonite DSB. On top of the refugium I have mini PC's that run 24/7.
<All sounds good. Do consider that in order to thrive, Caulerpa needs
about the same amount of light as moderate light corals.> I have a
couple of questions: First question is that I seem to be having trouble
getting my Caulerpa to thrive or grow in the refugium. The refugium is a
section of my wet/dry whereby there is a small power head that pumps
water from the main pump section of the wet/dry into the refugium
section and the water level weirs over into the skimmer section. The
flow seems low but is there none the less. The Caulerpa has been in the
refugium for about two months now, and if anything it looks like the
"clump" of Caulerpa is shrinking. <I would definitely consider
current as a culprit. Just like any other marine organism, Caulerpa
depends on water movement to deliver nutrients and carry away wastes.>
Concurrently, I have been having a slight amount of Red Cyano forming on
the fine DSB in the main display that I seem to have under control but
occasionally it reappears. I seem to be an "over feeder" so nutrient
export is important to me, hence Caulerpa in the refugium. I thought
initially that maybe the Caulerpa did not have enough to thrive on;
however with the Cyano forming, and the high fish load, I can't imagine
that the Caulerpa wouldn't thrive. Last night I went into the
refugium section to remove a small amount of red Cyano that formed on
top of a section of the Caulerpa and noticed that the Caulerpa was very
flimsy and slimy, almost as if I could have agitated the water enough to
eliminate the clump. Also it did not seem to have set any hold fasts
onto the live rock, but yet it wasn't floating either and there are a
few small clumps of it that did attach to the sides of the refugium. I
tested Phosphates and the reading was .2 so I am perplexed.
<Obviously, the Caulerpa isn't healthy and growing, so it isn't
exporting anything. Sometimes it takes a couple of tries to get it
established, so I would suggest trying again and increasing the light
and current a bit.> Caulerpa in California
I've forwarded you message to the WWM crew, many of whom are actually in
California. They'll reply to you directly. Cheers, Lorenzo Can
you give me any updates as to the Caulerpa ban in Calif.? I have seen
some people selling Caulerpa on eBay. What if the winner lives in
California? Is the seller at risk? What, if any, are potential hazards
for all involved? Thanks so much! -D <You'll want to check with
the particular municipality (County) and/or California Fish & Game re
whether the genus/family is banned for sale/use (are in San Diego). The
potential hazard? DON'T release this or any other non-indigenous species
to the wild! Bob Fenner>
PIJAC PetAlert
USDA PROPOSES TO LIST ALL CAULERPA SPECIES -- COULD BAN LIVE ROCK
ISSUE: The U.S.
Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) announced it would consider two petitions
requesting the addition of either (1) the genus Caulerpa or (2)the
entire species of Caulerpa taxifolia to the APHIS list of noxious
weeds.
WHAT IT MEANS:
If successfully listed as a noxious weed the trade of Caulerpa in
the United States would effectively end as one would need a permit
to transport it. This also potentially means that the trade in
live rock would also be banned as live rock might be considered
'infested' with Caulerpa.
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO:
Comments from the ornamental aquatics industry are needed now to
ensure that the USDA does not ban safe algae as well as LIVE ROCK
without a sound scientific justification. See below on how to
submit comments and what points to consider in your submission.
Comments are due by Dec. 27, 2004.
BACKGROUND: The
International Center for Technology Assessment (ICTA) and Professor
Susan L. Williams, University of California-Davis submitted two
petitions to the USDA APHIS requesting the listing of either the
whole genus Caulerpa or the entire species Caulerpa taxifolia to the
APHIS list of noxious weeds. These petitions were also signed by 104
invasive species scientists and resource managers.
The USDA announcement at
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/weeds/caulerpa/index.html
contains copies of the key documents.
Federal Register
Notice
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppd/rad/webrepor/ppq.html.
Petitioners argue that regulating (or, "listing") the genus Caulerpa
or the entire species C. taxifolia is scientifically sound given the
presence of multiple exceptionally invasive and highly variable
forms in these groups; the difficulty in identifying the single,
currently regulated strain of this species by eye; the frequency
with which species are being co-mingled, sold, and distributed in
the United States and the world; and evidence that many shipments of
algae and other aquarium plants are neither identified correctly nor
labeled accurately. They argue that allowing import of only those
species deemed non-invasive (which in their opinion means no species
of Caulerpa) is the only effective way to regulate these marine
algae. Exhibits accompanying the petitions indicated that
several importers referred to Caulerpa as "Algae green/in bags,"
"Grape algae," Algae Red," -- in most instances the proper
scientific names were included while some simply indicated "Caulerpa
Spec on Scleractinia." Petitioners claim that most retailers had no
idea of the species they handle and that "live rock" is a major
pathway despite the fact that the only surveys conducted did not
find any Caulerpa taxifolia on the live rock.
It should be
noted that the strain C. taxifolia (Mediterranean clone) or noted in
the petitions as "C. taxifolia MC" is currently banned from import
into the US as well as in the State of California which has the
support of the industry. 8 other Caulerpa species are
prohibited in California due to being "look-alikes" or species where
some data indicated potential problems in California waters.
MAIN MESSAGE: Your comments to
the USDA APHIS should state that they not approve either petition at
this time. Rather the USDA APHIS should work within the
framework of the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force's inter-agency
"National Management Plan for the Genus Caulerpa," currently in its
final stages of approval.
Other points are that the petitions fail to contain scientific or
other evidence justifying wholesale listing of an entire genus or
the species C. taxifolia and USDA should defer any action pending
the receipt of reliable data. As noted in the petitions C.
taxifolia occurs as a native species in parts of Hawaii and Florida
and is not considered invasive thus any contention that C. taxifolia
is "naturally" an invasive species that wipes out huge areas of
native species is clearly false.
Secondly, again as noted in the petition, the C. taxifolia that is
considered invasive in the Mediterranean "apparently underwent a
genetic change while being maintained in aquaria" and "this change
is hypothesized to contribute to its invasiveness." If this is
true, as claimed, then the chances of C. taxifolia from other areas
around the World which have not been exposed to long-term aquarium
conditions (meaning Caulerpa on live rock etc.) having undergone
genetic change to become invasive is scientifically remote.
Thirdly, as noted on the web page of Dr. Susan Williams (http://www.bml.ucdavis.edu/facresearch/williams.html)
species of Caulerpa commonly grow in many tropical marine waters
around the world and remain in the understory of seagrass beds which
can outcompete Caulerpa. Thus, by her own admission Caulerpa
is not a renegade species of algae bent on carpeting the ocean floor
which is how her petition reads.
Fourthly, peer-reviewed and published research has shown that the
extent of the Caulerpa invasion in the Mediterranean has been
overstated by an order of magnitude or more and the establishment of
Caulerpa in a seagrass bed does not automatically mean the demise of
the seagrasses. All these points and more demonstrate that
there is no scientific evidence to support the listing of the entire
species or genus as a noxious weed. More research is required
as called for in the draft National Management Plan before listing.
DEADLINE:
The comment period closes on December 27, 2004
ACTION: Submit written
comments.
* Mail: send four copies of your comment (an original and three
copies) to Docket No. 04-037-1, Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3C71, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737-1238.
Make sure to state that your comment refers to
Docket No. 04-037-1. * E-mail: Address your comment to <
regulations@aphis.usda.gov >.
Include your name, address, "Docket No. 04-037-1'" in the
subject line, and your comment in the body of your message. Do not
include any attached files.
* On line comments can be submitted and viewed via the agency web
site: Go to <
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppd/rad/cominst.html
>
Send a copy to the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council, 1220 19th
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036 or
info@pijac.org. For more
information, call PIJAC at 202-452-1525 Caulerpa
taxifolia - invasive plant Crew: <Mary> Did you see the
recent Nova program on PBS? <Yes> Caulerpa taxifolia is a very
invasive plant. <Invasive, yes, plant, no> You should be
warning people to not grow or use it. <We have done so repeatedly...
if you would have checked WWM and WWF you would see this is so> If
they have some now, they should be told how to dispose of it properly.
<Sigh... this has been done so as well> Here you are seemingly
promoting it. Now that you know, I am sure you will update:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/caulerpaalg.htm Here are 3 google
finds that might help you understand the issue. It is clearly important
for California. <http://www.bcs.gov.tr/dosyalar/executivesum.doc>
Introduction File Format: Microsoft Word 97 - <http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:mTh1BVHYKJwJ:www.bcs.gov.tr/dosyalar/e
xecutivesum.doc+%22Caulerpa+taxafolia%22&hl=en> View as HTML ... A
consensus was reached that Caulerpa taxifolia was a serious threat,
especially, against the ecological balance in the western Mediterranean.
... www.bcs.gov.tr/dosyalar/executivesum.doc - <http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=related:www.bcs.gov.tr/dosyalar/ex
ecutivesum.doc> Similar pages <http://jacobson.home.cern.ch/jacobson/sea/projects/corsica/corsica.html>
SEA Project Corsica ... A particularly interesting issue, is the
dispersion of the foreign species Caulerpa taxifolia. Caulerpa
taxifolia is a tropical ... jacobson.home.cern.ch/jacobson/
sea/projects/corsica/corsica.html - 5k - <http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:FyI7sRQF8EoJ:jacobson.home.cern.ch/jac
obson/sea/projects/corsica/corsica.html+%22Caulerpa+taxafolia%22&hl=en>
Cached - <http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=related:jacobson.home.cern.ch/jaco
bson/sea/projects/corsica/corsica.html> Similar pages <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/environment/july-dec04/species_7-1.html>
Online NewsHour: US Battles Invasive Species -- July 1, 2004 ... the
lagoon. JEFFREY KAYE: That plant was Caulerpa Taxifolia, a hearty,
fast-growing seaweed native to the tropics. When introduced ...
www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/environment/ july-dec04/species_7-1.html - 28k -
<http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8Dyd7WQenywJ:www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/e
nvironment/july-dec04/species_7-1.html+%22Caulerpa+taxafolia%22&hl=en>
Cached - <http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=related:www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/en
vironment/july-dec04/species_7-1.html> Similar pages Thanks Mary
Feay <Thank you for your concern. Bob Fenner> Re: Caulerpa
taxifolia - invasive plant Bob: <Mary> Thanks for your
immediate response - I feel a tiny bit better that you say you
understand. But the very top Caulerpa taxifolia google website find was
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/caulerpaalg.htm. And this is what I
found on that page: "Caulerpa taxifolia, one of the best species of the
best genus of algae for marine aquarium use." <It is indeed so>
I looked for other references on your website and all I found were
recommendations for how to use and even that you can ship it to Canada.
<Some States can. As far as I'm aware, only California bars the sale,
use of the family Caulerpaceae> I found only 1 reference to invasive
- and it just talked about how invasive Caulerpa is in an aquarium. The
point is that even a tiny bit can be washed to the ocean and proliferate
wiping out everything in its way. <Mary... take a few deep
breaths... and take a look around you... likely you're surrounded by
toxic, invasive species... Do you have a Dieffenbachia picta Family:
Araceae in your home, garden? This is a toxic, invasive houseplant...
how about Eucalyptus in the U.S.? A good many of the plants, animals are
non-indigenous... ALL are trouble... my stock admonition: RELEASE
NOTHING to the wild. And the standard routine for disposal... freeze (in
your freezer) and dispose of on trash day... NOT down a sink, toilet...>
It is toxic, so as you FAQ noted, nothing eats it. <Mary... enough
hysterics... MANY organisms DO eat these species. READ, and stop
sensationalizing> It is not a native to anywhere, it is a human
creation. <What? No... this is a general misunderstanding... that
was further perpetuated by the PBS show.> At least people in
California and other coastal areas should be warned not to use it. I
understand it is banned from importation, but the US did not require
destruction of existing stock or sales. <Actually...
please read before... It's use, sale in California is indeed restricted
by law> That is probably really the answer - this stuff is worse
that killer bees. Thanks again. Mary Feay <What about the
ill-effects of too many humans on the planet? Bob Fenner>
Re:
Caulerpa taxifolia - invasive plant Bob: If you send your
snail mail address, I can send you a VHS tape as I TIVOed it, so I can
easily make you a copy and mail it. <I appreciate your kind offer,
but no thank you> Here is a PBS website - look at 1990 - in
California.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/algae/chronology.html Thanks again
Mary Feay <I've followed the development of this pest algae for more
than fifteen years... It is not as large an issue as many folks make
out, however, I do not use it, or condone people breaking the law in
using same. Bob Fenner> Re: Caulerpa taxifolia - invasive plant
Bob: Well, I don't have any dieffenbachia, nor would I plant a
eucalyptus. I am trying desperately to rid my little 2 acre oak and shag
bark hickory forest of invasives. <Ah, then you very likely
understand my position> OK, so I am a planet hugger, and we have
no children, so we aren't adding to the people problem.
<Outstanding. I too consider myself similarly inclined... and elected to
not reproduce as well> Do you really take your aquarium water and
freeze it before disposing of it in the trash? <Mmm, no. I actually
only have two freshwater (African Cichlid) tanks... and toss their water
change water onto my lawn and citrus trees out the back> That sounds
pretty weird to me. <Mmm, sorry for the confusion. I was referring
to encouraging people to rid themselves specifically of Caulerpa spp.>
Better to not propagate an invasive species. I am glad to hear that
California prohibits Caulerpa. Bye! <Thank you, Bob Fenner>
DSB & lightly stocked FOWLR tank Hi guys/gals- <<And hello to
you, JasonC here at your service.>> I was hoping you could answer a
question or two for me. After I give you the specs. <<Shoot...>> I am
in the process of upgrading from a 4 year old 55 FO tank into a 125
FOWLR tank w/ 40 gal refugium and 20 gal sump. The "gang" consists
of: 1- 6" Naso tang 1- 4" Regal Blue Tang 1- 4" Sailfin Tang
1- 4" Yellow Tang assorted 1"ish original set-up damsels 1- arrow
crab - 55gal FO "clean up crew" from F.F.E. (lots of crabs and
snails) - 130lbs of live rock Equipment for new 125 FOWLR:
-Berlin Turbo Classic skimmer -2 - Mag12 pumps for circulation
-500w of compacts- 6x65 8000k daylights and 2x55 actinic blue I was
planning on some sand and Caulerpa of some sort for the refugium.
<<Any chance I can encourage you to try another macro algae besides
Caulerpa? There are some other, more predictable options.>> Would
this amount of livestock be ok for a DSB of 4-5"? Or should I go with
the 1" or less idea in the main tank and have a DSB in the 39gal
refugium? <<Yes, 4-5" would make a good sand bed, but an extra inch
would help. You won't be able to accomplish an equivalent DSB in the
refugium compared to the 125 because of the reduced surface area. If it
were me, I would put a DSB in each.>> It sounds like the livestock
will eat much of the cool stuff off of the live rock so I was
considering having some of the live rock and the DSB in the refugium and
skip the Caulerpa. <<Or you can rotate rock between the two so that you
can offer that army of tangs something fresh and new every so often.
Picking algae from the rockwork is what these fish do constantly in the
wild - constantly. If you want to have showcase tangs, I'd do my best to
offer them something as close to natural as possible.>> The refugium is
mounted underneath the main tank and will be a display tank also. So I
was hoping I could keep some of the live rock full of "life". <<Think
about moving rock between the two systems - I think this would take you
a long way.>> I have an extra Magnum 350 canister filter. Could it be
useful somehow with the new tank? Maybe for calcium or something? <<For
calcium? Heavens no... I'd use one as a substrate cleaner, or perhaps a
ways to run activated carbon on the system... that's about it or perhaps
EBay fodder.>> Thank you again. All of you are making me feel much
more at ease about the upgrade. <<Glad we can be of service.>> Dennis
<<Cheers, J -- >> Re: Antoine, pls see note on bottom below
(Caulerpa, use in marine aquariums) Bobster... Thanks bud...
duly noted. I have made mention recently of an article I'm working on
detailing concerns with keeping massive amounts of Caulerpa in
systems focused on coral growth. I just ran down some papers to cite and
support the anecdotal observations. <Better to have a mix of species,
Divisions... and keep the Caulerpaceans cut back> Gist of it all
being... if coral growth is a primary goal/thrust in the system... then
there are better (less noxious/less labor intensive) algae to culture.
{did I mention that I wrote that Bill that passed in Cali banning that
rat weed Caulerpa ;)? ) <You better not have... you may be swimming
with the fishes soon... Bob> Coming to a theater near you...
Caulerpa vs. Seagrass for Refugium & MM filter Anthony,
<cheers, mate> I was reading through "FAQs about Refugium IV" section
and you stated: "Syringodium manatee seagrass would be awesome
here... many benefits to it as a refugium. Whatever you choose, though,
PLEASE do not use Caulerpa... an awful thing to do to a coral system on
a larger scale" Can you explain this further? I want to understand
why would Caulerpa be bad in a refugium? <yes... my pleasure.
Caulerpa itself is not so bad, but rather easily mismanaged. For decades
aquarists have enjoyed its benefits of great nutrient export with little
trouble because we rarely did/could keep it in large masses (tangs,
angels and other fishes eating it in check) and the lack of refugium
applications. Now that refugiums have become popular, aquarists are
keeping it in larger quantities and discovering the many pitfalls with
it. The problem is that it is very labor intensive to maintain safely in
large quantities. It must be harvested systematically like clockwork
(!!!) and you should not cut branches (saps noxious elements and risks a
disastrous sexual event of pollution)... instead each frond must be
carefully hand picked and extracted to thin the colony. Caulerpa also
contains some of the most noxious elements known that inhibit coral
growth. They secrete serious discolorants into the water that require
ozonation or weekly changes of carbon to maintain water clarity, and the
risk of a sexual event (expelling all of the nutrients from growth en
masses) can cause catastrophe in some systems. Other plants share
similar negative qualities... but none so commonly and to the extent of
Caulerpa. It is simply too risky in large quantities... BUT... I do
enjoy and recommend it in small amounts. I'll publish a paper soon on
the topic. Many experienced aquarists are discovering this dilemma with
Caulerpa... I got some scientific references from Eric Borneman who is
very much in agreement on the topic: ANYTHING but Caulerpa is better :)
> Also, I am setting up a 350g (96"x24"x36") reef tank in the spring
with SPS as the primary inhabitants. <the your definitely do not
want Caulerpa... shown to markedly inhibit the growth of stonies> The
plan was to use and EcoSystem mud filter that uses Caulerpa. <I see
no significant advantage using Caulerpa here... although I do like the
idea of you using a fishless refugium to generate natural plankton for
your zooplankton feeding SPS (little phyto here)> The EcoSystem site
recommends Caulerpa but states Seagrass can be used also. Do you believe
Caulerpa is bad in this setup and would you recommend Seagrass as an
alternative? <definitely> If so, what are the pros/cons?
<slower, safer and more manageable growth of seagrasses. Less noxious
compounds exuded, a true plant that does not execute a sexual vegetative
state/event under duress, more useful epiphytic material shed from the
blades of the seagrasses... perhaps better support of copepods
populations for it. Thalassia is a shorter seagrass species for refugia
under 24"> Thanks as always. <best regards, Anthony> - Rob
Caulerpa Hi Bob This is Dan Garcia from Sacramento, {MARS}.
I'm attending a meeting put on by the department of Fish and Game and
the RIDNIS, the subject CAULERPA!!! The Law and punishment. {the
meeting is on Nov. 19th} My question to you is, do you have any pictures
of the different types that we use in the aquarium trade? If you do
could I use them during my part of this witch hunt. If you have any
question please call me at 916-419-XXXX or my cell-916-799-XXXX. By the
way Karen sends her love <Yeah Dan... Got Caulerpa? You're a
criminal! Oh, some pix here: http://www.wetwebmedia.com/caulerpaalg.htm
Will these do... can you lift sufficient size, format off our sites? If
not, make this known, will scan more, send along what you're looking
for. Bob Fenner> Thanks, Dan Garcia Refugium Dear WWM
crew, I'm in the process of starting a 24"x24" refugium in my
sump. What is a good on-line source for Caulerpa? <Check the links
at Wetwebmedia.com I hesitate to recommend any specific etailer. There
are numerous choices.> What quantities and type? <Have you read
about the pros and cons of using Caulerpa? This is also catalogued at
WWM.> Does Caulerpa require quarantine or special acclimation?
<Many aquarist suggest QT for anything added to the aquarium. I
personally only quarantine fish. But I am aware of the risk inherent in
this method and I accept those risks. Acclimation is similar to the
acclimation of fish and corals.> Do you recommend other
(types/quantities/acclimation/quarantine) critters for the refugium as
well? <I suggest starter cultures of copepods, Mysis shrimp, and
similar critters. No fish. You can start your search with Inland
Aquatics and IPSF (Indo Pacific Sea Farms). Thanks again for your
service, Brian <The pleasure was mine! David Dowless>
Friends Don't Let Friends Buy Caulerpa! Good evening! <Hi
there! Scott F. here for you!> I just recently heard about utilizing
mangroves in a sump vs. Caulerpa, searched your site for more info,
found a little. Was wondering if you could give me a quick run down on
the pro's and / or con's of this, was just about to set up a new sump
for Caulerpa when I heard about mangroves. <Well- first off- I
wouldn't look at mangroves as a means of efficient nutrient export, like
macroalgae. They grow very slowly...much too slowly to perform the same
export function in a closed system as macroalgae. They do encourage the
growth of various fauna within their root systems, however, so are
interesting in that regard. You should purchase a copy of Anthony
Calfo's "Book of Coral Propagation" for some really cool information on
using mangroves, as well as more good stuff on macroalgae and nutrient
export. A must read, IMO.> I am looking for a natural way to lower
nitrate levels so I can start adding corals, liked the Caulerpa idea
because I could cut off excess growth and feed to my ever-grazing Naso
tang. Current tank is 120 gallon fish and liverock only with 29 gallon
sump. Thanks for any info you can provide, love your website!! Doug
Edwardsville, IL <Thanks for the kind words, Doug! Although very
popular, Caulerpa is not really the best choice for a purposeful
macroalgae, IMO. After lots of personal research, reading, and
discussions with the likes of Anthony Calfo, Eric Borneman, and others,
I have concluded that there are more drawbacks than benefits to Caulerpa
use. This stuff grows like a weed, true- and if harvested regularly, can
export nutrient efficiently. However, should you rip segments of the
plant through careless harvesting, many potentially noxious chemicals
from within the plant are leached back into the water. Also, these algae
have a tendency to go into a sexual reproduction stage, potentially
releasing enormous quantities of gametes and other cellular material
into the water, negatively impacting oxygen levels, among other things.
I'd look into more "docile" macroalgae, such as Chaetomorpha, Ulva, and
even Halimeda. They offer many of the advantages of Caulerpa, without
much of the detrimental effects. As Anthony likes to say- "Friends don't
let friends buy Caulerpa!" 'Nuff said! Good luck, and have fun working
on this project!> Caulerpa! Gentlemen, I am so confused
on this Caulerpa issue. When I built my tank I thought if you build a
refugium you got to have Caulerpa, now I am reading that this is very
bad for my all my SPS that I dearly love. So do I pull this demon out of
my refugium and fill it with a deeper DSB....but what about all that
good micro fauna....or do I add some other nutrient export plant that
will support the micro fauna and not cause havoc to my SPS? <Caulerpa
is a fast growing plant, and can be efficient at nutrient export.
However, it tends to overgrow everything in its path! If Caulerpa is
damaged during regular harvesting (which you should do), it can release
many noxious compounds into your water that can be harmful for corals.
Also, Caulerpa tends to go sexual, and release its reproductive products
into the water column, adding a serious organic load. I'd recommend
other macroalgae, such as Chaetomorpha, which can grow rapidly, and can
be harvested for efficient nutrient export.> By the way I have lost
some SPS suddenly and now I suspect this green demon!! <Well- you
never no- but could be...maybe...?> 135 Gal show tank 200 lbs
LR.......45 Gal refugium mucho Caulerpa, Seaclone skimmer, emperor 400,
light fish load some SPS, LPSs, soft corals...3 175MH 10K ,2
URI...VHO blue actinics. I know this is a huge pet peeve of yours but
I am writing this at work and can't offer any water parameters <><>ME SO
SORRY<><> Thanks again in advance <That's okay, just read up on some
other macroalgae. I think you'll find some that can be just as easy to
grow, but not have all of the negatives associated with Caulerpa! Good
luck! Scott F.> Caulerpa Refugium Dear WWM Crew, I've
acquired some Caulerpa. I think I've identified it as razor Caulerpa,
Caulerpa serrulata. Is this a good algae for my new refugium? <It
depends on the intended purpose of the refugium and your tanks needs.>
Should I allow any in my display tank? <Again, it depends.> My
refugium will be 22" x 24" x 10" high and will have 2" of Miracle Mud.
How much shall I start with (I have lots) <You do not need too much.>
and will it attach itself to the mud? <It should use its holdfasts to
attach/"root".> Any other comments or suggestions would be helpful.
<There is a lot of information on refugium types and macroalgae in our
FAQ files on www.WetWebMedia.com.> My primary use of the refugium is
to help control nitrates in my 180 gallon reef tank. <Caulerpa is
excellent for nutrient control, but more and more research is showing it
is harmful to corals. You are going to have to strike a fine balance
here. I would also pursue some other means of nutrient control (protein
skimming, careful feedings, appropriate foods and supplements, clean
source water, etc.).> Thanks for your help, Brian <You are
welcome. -Steven Pro> Re: Help with Refugium Hello Dr
Fenner, <Just Bob, please> You helped me a while back with some
questions I had concerning a mini-reef 25g hexagon tank, a mad clown and
a Prizm skimmer. For some unknown reason, the skimmer is back on line
and working fine again and the mad clown has had to be taken back to the
pet store and exchanged for a more docile one. Reading through your
FAQ's and website, I am sold on your thoughts and philosophies and went
ahead and purchased your book "The Conscientious Marine Aquarist" which
I read in one clean sweep until my eyes began to bleed, absolutely
fantastic reading. I am also sold on the idea of a refugium to aid water
quality. <A worthwhile addition> The water parameters in the main
tank have all been stable for about 4 months (tank 6 months old), with
the exception of Nitrate which sometimes goes as high as 10ppm. <Soon
to be diminished> I have purchased a 15g tank (18x12x18) which will
be set-up as a down-stream refugium and would like to know your thoughts
on the following: - 4in sand bed - 15kg (33Ib) of live rock -
Your thoughts on suitable macro-algae. To be honest, the only things
that I can find the LFS selling in the UK is Caulerpas and Mangrove
pods. - Lighting 1 x 15w (PowerGlo 18k spectrum) <All sounds
fine... though many of my cohorts think otherwise, I would use the
Caulerpa (leave the lighting on 24/7), being careful to not let it "get
away", overgrow the system... watching for any ill-effects of its
abundance... Perhaps keeping an eye on your suppliers for other
macrophytes to supplant it with in coming months (like Halimeda,
Gracilaria...)> My concerns are the use of Caulerpas in the refugium
considering I have a few soft corals in the main tank (Leathers,
Mushrooms, Sinularia & Xenia's) and the lighting on the refugium. Should
I use a reverse cycle or 24/7? <I would leave the lighting on (with
the Caulerpas) continuously> On my existing live rock in the tank, I
have noticed an amount of copepods milling around in the night time
(sitting there with my flashlight, much to the annoyance of the misses)
and hope to have a similar introduction in the refugium. <You will>
Thanks in advance for your help. Kind Regards Sandeep <Be
chatting, Bob Fenner> Re: Caulerpa I liked your page on
Redox (checked it for use in a class on wetlands), but PLEASE don't
recommend using the alga Caulerpa anywhere!!!! It has become one of the
most noxious, damaging exotic species in the world, wiping out of much
of the natural biodiversity of the ocean bottom in the Mediterranean,
and now creeping up the California coast. It should be widely
identified as an absolute "no-no" for aquarium owners!!! Joan G.
Ehrenfeld Professor Dept. of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural
Resources 14 College Farm Road Cook College, Rutgers University
New Brunswick, NJ 08901 <Thank you for your input. There are others
here who dislike this family of algae for other reasons. The
Caulerpaceae are banned in our part of S. California as a
"too-dangerous" noxious weed... and NOTHING should be released to the
wild IMO. Bob Fenner> Dreadful Rat Weed <G> Caulerpa
Several days ago the Caulerpa in one of my refugium's went sexual
causing some major water problems with my system. <all too common.
I'm sorry my friend> I will never have any significant amount of it
in my system again. <exactly the crux of the issue my friend. You
are quite correct! Small quantities kept in check can be enjoyed with
little or no trouble at all. It is the recent popularity of keeping
Caulerpa in refugium and garbage can full portions (!) that has made us
realize how toxic the stuff really is (inhibiting corals and fishes). I
just e-mailed an interested aquarist 9 pages of scientific references on
Caulerpa toxicity. What a dreadful macro for reef tanks (specifically)>
The only saving grace is, at your recommendation, I have been in the
process of removing the stuff for several months now and I didn't have a
huge amount left. If this had happened a month or two ago I would have
had a full scale disaster. <I'm grateful not to hear that story... I
hear too many of them every month> Since the "event," I have noticed
a drastic reduction in the number of little critters in both refugium's
and my main tank. <oh, ya> I would assume (love that word) the
"event" took them out. <Does a bear bring a readers digest into the
woods?!? I mean... yes. I agree> Except for one of my cleaner shrimp
that has gone AWOL (hopefully just molting, beginning to get worried
though) <hope is the single greatest gift to mankind> my corals
and fish survived well. Anyway, I was wondering if you had any
information on transplanting Padina and Sargassum? <both are very
attractive to me, but Sargassum has similar toxicity issues (although
not as severe as Caulerpa). Neither mentioned are very good in aquarium
for nutrient export if that was your goal. For that, look to
Chaetomorpha, Gracilaria or even turf algae species in a proper
scrubber> From reading your site I understand it is very stable?
<agreed... although not as stable as some calcareous species like
Halimeda> I have a good supply of both in my main tank and would like
to transplant some of it into my refugium without moving the LR it is
attached to. Can it just be pulled off the rock, rubber banded or
wedged on/in rocks or does the entire hold fast need to go with it? If
so, is there an easy way to remove it intact? <clip/snip at the
base of the plant with poultry/chicken scissors to skin rock with the
plant> The Padina (ribbon) is exceptionally beautiful and I would
like to ensure its survival in the refugium. Should the Padina
and Sargassum be lit 24/7 or on an opposite lighting schedule from
the main tank? <they can be lit opposite if you like for pH
stability, but not 24/7 like Caulerpa... (no stasis here)> The other
refugium has . . . will have sea grasses. Any help on this matter
would be very much appreciated. <excellent... seek Thalassia from
any merchant you like that seems to have a good supplier for Atlantic
species (hermits, turbo snails, etc). Best regards, Anthony?>
Just saying no to Caulerpa Hello Crew, <cheers, mate> It's
Howard form Wisconsin again. Still trying to get my new refugium going.
My older refugium is 30 gallons, 6+ inch fine sand bed, 20+ pounds of
live rock, lots of bristle worms, 150-200 gallon flow through, and fed
from show tank overflow. <all very cool> It is choc full of
Caulerpa racemosa. <Doh! That part is not cool. One of the most toxic
even among noxious Caulerpas. A wonderful nutrient export vehicle, but
labor intensive and inhibiting to coral growth. If coral growth is no
biggie... then you may be able to enjoy this Caulerpa> Since I got it
going I have had no detectable nitrates (Aquarium Systems Sea Test Low
Range). I cut out about a third of the growth every week (tang food and
gifted to LFS). <excellent... this is one of the keys to succeeding
with Caulerpa... prevents terminal vegetative events of sexual
reproduction> I want to replace the Caulerpa with another macro after
reading about Anthony's [comments on Caulerpas] dark side". <very
cool... less work at least with same benefits in another alga> My new
refugium is planned primarily to grow amphipods cleaner and peppermint
shrimp eggs and other natural foods. It has 6 inches of fine sand and
about 15 pounds of live rock. I must have macroalgae to feed and shelter
the 'pods. Also, to learn more about the Caulerpa substitutes. <OK...
agreed> I have been very unsuccessful in growing Ochtodes, Ulva, or
Gracilaria. All gradually turned white and disintegrated. Also, "tang
heaven red" (Gracilaria) lives on but doesn't expand. <actually...
the Ulva and especially the Gracilaria should have rather easy to
culture as non-calcareous species. Simply requiring bright light and
reasonably good water flow. Did they die shortly after acquisition...
this would suggest acclimation or source. Else, post 2-weeks... your
water parameters are implicated. Caulerpa is one of the few algae to
stand low light low flow and still survive (rat weeds are funny that way
<G>)> Penicillus and Udotea flabellum are doing ok but are slow
growing and not famous for "exporting" nutrients. <exactly as we'd
suspect from calcareous species> My basement refugiums can be
"restarted", flowed, fed and lit any way imaginable. My questions are:
What are the ideal conditions to grow the available non-Caulerpa macros
such as Gracilaria and Ulva? Flow?, lighting?, turbulence?. Raw overflow
or filtered water? <raw overflowing water of moderate to strong
turbulence in shallow brightly lit waters> Can more than one type be
in the same tank - compatibility? <never recommended... energy is
spent on competition instead of growth... just like corals> Is my
overflow system water too clean and I need "fertilizer"? <very
unlikely as long as you are not pre-filtering> Should the Gracilaria
and other fine plants be allowed to float or be stuck under a rock?
<depends on the species... I prefer free-floating for vegetable
filtration harvesting> Finding a replacement for the no-problem,
grows like crazy, Caulerpa has not been easy. <there are numerous
choices my friend. Chaetomorpha is not very sexy, but one of the very
best for pod culture and nutrient export. Do consider as well. I
personally like the Gracilaria> Howard <best regards, Anthony>
Macro-algae I'll try to be quick and to the point because I know
you must get tired of answering Caulerpa questions. I have a 40g FOWLR
(40lbs) system, skimmer, hang-on whisper filter. I would like to add
some mexicana for looks mostly, something for fish to nip on, and to
help outcompete nuisance algae. <I hope your lighting is up to the
task. You don't need a lot but you could use at least 2+ watts per
gallon unless you use Sawblade Caulerpa. I used it in a QT tank with no
artificial lighting for over a year and it grew and reproduced to the
extent that I had to harvest> Tell me if my statements are correct -
comment where necessary. #1) This would be mostly beneficial to my
system since I don't have to worry about coral growth. <Yep...But if
you ever decide to eradicate this stuff, it's really difficult to do>
#2) This will help "outcompete" some nuisance algae. <Yep...That's
the theory> #3) Has the disadvantage of going "sexual" but with
careful "thinning out" should be ok. <I've never had the problem>
#4) Since I have LR and a good skimmer, the added "nutrient export" does
not add much benefit to my system in this regard. <You can't
possibly get too much nutrient export> Now a couple questions. #1)
Reading all the FAQs on careful maintenance, will fish nipping and
eating it cause it to "bleed" (as I've heard it referenced as) causing
pollutants to my tank? <Yep and so will your harvesting. Use of
carbon in your sump will help control this problem and it is dangerous
to fishes...it just makes the water look yellow> #2) Will my
coralline algae be hampered and outcompeted by this other form of
macro-algae? <Possibly if you let it get out of hand> #3) Is there
a better green macro that is aesthetically pleasing and have the same
benefits with less problems? <Does it need to be green? If not,
Gracilaria is great. Tangs love the stuff and it grows pretty easily.
Feather Caulerpa is beautiful but IME it tends to be finicky and
fragile> My LFS seems to have a large supply of a few different types
of Caulerpa so I'm fairly certain I can attain a good sample at a good
price. <Sounds good to me> Thank you as always for the time.
<No problem. Hope I've helped. David Dowless> Caulerpa in my
refugium ? Dear "Anyone that will answer" :-) <I feel like
"someone" :) > I have a 55 gallon live rock tank with a few pieces
of coral, mushrooms, polyps...nothing major. The tank also has about 10
fish. The tank is about 2 years old. I am building a refugium in the
Eco system Method... <sorry to hear it... heehee. Joking (half at
least)> with 4 baffles filled with "Miracle Mud" and Caulerpa on a
24/7 light schedule. <a secret: the "miracle" to Miracle mud is that
people actually pay that much money for soil> At least those WERE my
plans until I was reading in the FAQ section that Caulerpa produces
toxins to corals and would be considered bad if I was planning on adding
coral one piece at a time every month or so. <hmmm... more
information needed here for sure. Caulerpa is NOT the devil incarnate
and it can be very useful for nutrient export. However... it is very
labor intensive and potentially volatile. And I am not referring to
events of sexual reproduction (only). That can easily be skirted by
systematic thinning of o colony to stave off completion of a its life
cycle (3-6 months for most species in the genus). 24/7 light (stasis)
may do the same. There are far more serious concerns with Caulerpa
regarding anti-biotic and anti-fouling exudations which harm coral on a
daily basis and slowly concentrate in the system. Any benefit you seek
from Caulerpa, I can name a much safer algae for use in your vegetable
filter. Gracilaria ranks high... true turf algae (Chaetomorpha and the
like) are even better if using algal mats> So now I am confused.
First I went from wanting to add Caulerpa to the refugium and put it on
a reverse light schedule from the main tank. <I can dig the RDP
photoperiod for pH stabilization> But then after researching Leng
Sy's specifications, he called for a full 24/7 daylight schedule for the
Caulerpa so it NEVER produces and releases the carbon dioxide, toxins,
chlorophyll into the water. <that last string of claims is not
exactly true... the toxic exudations are unrelated to acts of sexual
reproduction. Caulerpa sheds them just like coral shed nematocysts and
various allelopathic compounds. All must be addressed with regular water
changes and carbon/ozone. I like weekly for water changes and carbon
(small and consistent amounts)> So what do i do? <cheer loud for
the Steelers next Sunday playing against Tennessee> I've heard that
deviating from his plans just a little bit (by not adding the baffles,
not using Miracle Mud, and not having the right kind of Caulerpa, as
well as the 24/7 mandatory light schedule) is what seems to make most
folks fail at his method's proven success. <I would argue instead
that modification of his good idea can make it even better! Keep the
mud, run the lights on a reverse period, don't use Caulerpa, do protein
skim aggressively, and enjoy a better refugium for it> If Caulerpa is
the "demon" macro algae that I am reading so very much about in the FAQ
section, <and beyond! There is a mountain of scientific information
to support its effects on corals and fishes if abused.> then why does
the EcoSystem work so well? <by virtue of the many different ways
that various aquarists succeed or fail to succeed in aquarium husbandry
at large> Thru my research on the net, it seems his methods don't
leach any toxins into his tanks. <'Net research! Ughhh! Please,
bud... completely anecdotal (including our forum right now) if not
commercial (not us). If you want good research... get hard data... real
science. I'll give you a page full of references to run down if you like
(boring). And like Chris Farley said... "You can stick you head up a
cow's..." er, well... "just take the advice of the butcher." Not just a
bunch of aquarists with one and two year old tanks saying "everything
looks great". Noxious exudations take many months to take a toll on
coral and fish health. We are talking here about a long view of health
for your reef aquarium> I suppose that's because in his method,
Caulerpa is harvested regularly and never allowed to reproduce. Do you
feel that having the lights on 24/7 is possibly the BIGGEST reason
why the Caulerpa in his setup's don't leech these "toxins" you all are
saying it does? <I am certain that Caulerpa leeches them despite
marketing claims> I'm also wondering if I should still continue to
build my refugium using the EcoSystem Miracle Mud's schematics.
<experiment and adopt the parts you like best. Strike out on your own...
and Go West... Go West, young man.> My biggest goal here is to get my
nitrates down to near zero WITHOUT the use of a protein skimmer or other
artificial means. <Good heavens! You made me take the long way around
the barn for that! <G> Dude... a five gallon bucket filled with 60# of
oolitic sand and tapped with a bulkhead at the top... water flowing
inline on the way down to the sump. Please... NNR (natural nitrate
reduction) for the cost of a bucket (50cents) and a bag of Southdown
sand (less than $3). Much better nitrate reduction with almost no
maintenance headaches> I just don't have a whole lot of room for such
peripherals in my main sump. Please advise on what, if anything I should
do to get my refugium up and running properly. I don't want to poison
my corals, but at the same time, I want to reduce my nitrates as low as
possible. <deep sand bed my friend> Other macro algae's were
mentioned. Which is closest to having a Caulerpa-like nitrate reducing
effect without producing toxins? Also, would I still need to leave the
lights on 24/7 with any OTHER macro algae besides Caulerpa? <Caulerpa
is one of the only algae that can permissibly be illuminated 24/7...
others will die without respiration> Thanks again for all your
help. I am learning a lot here. Regards, Steve <excellent to hear,
bud. Best regards, Anthony> Caulerpa & Pictures & Phil, oh why?
- 02/27/03 Greetings to the best crew on the Web: I have been
reading a lot about the recent decline of Caulerpa's popularity.
However, after reading the dailies (which I am addicted too, thank you),
I followed this link:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/greenalg.htm and right there, under
"What's Available:", you have listed as "The Best: Caulerpas". What
gives? Is it just that you guys are overwhelmed with website
maintenance (completely understandable), or is it still the best?
<Quite possibly a matter of difference of opinion. Anthony appears to be
concerned re the family of green algaes "exudations" are potentially
dangerous (they are, but so is white bread in excess), whereas I am of
the opinion that with general care there is not much of a problem, and
that the Caulerpaceans capacity for 24/7 photosynthetic activity makes
them winners for many applications... Could also be that there is a
"temporal issue" at play here, with different folks' varying statements
changing over time> Just want to know before I go out and get
some ;). Thanks, Rich Ps: if/when I send a picture for comment, what
is the best resolution/file size to keep it at? <Jpeg or bitmaps of
about 100 dpi are fine> Also, did crewmember Phil really write/admit
he was 15, or was that a typo? <This is Phil Bozek's age, as stated.
He is an exemplary (young) person who had written an article placed on
WWM and is (surprising to some) well-learned, written and desirous of
sharing his knowledge and experience. Bob Fenner> Sea grape
sel. Hello to All! <All of PF with you here tonight, Jason>
I have a refugium that I've been wanting to put some macro-algae
in. One of my local fish stores have now started selling sea grape by
the pound. Would placing this in my gravity fed refugium be beneficial
to my tank? Its a 65gal. 75lbs of LR; toadstool, xenia and button
polyps are my only inhabitants.. <Well, it sounds like they're selling
Caulerpa racemosa. I'm not fond of Caulerpa as it made quite an effort
to take over my tank, strangling off my xenia before I got it under
control (thanks to a hungry tang). I prefer Chaetomorpha to Caulerpa -
it doesn't crash, it doesn't try to take over the tank, and it doesn't
produce allelopathic chemicals - all major pluses in my book. Check
w/your LFS and see if they'll order it for you. OTOH, if you have a tang
(or other herbivorous fish such as a rabbit fish) then you could try the
Caulerpa and feed it to the fish. Personally though, I'm much happier
with Chaetomorpha.> thanks, Jason...Surfs Up! <It usually is on
the coast I live on, but not much fun to play in the Oregon surf, to
cold for my blood. ; ) > Got Caulerpa? You're a criminal.
In San Diego, the civil servant eco-Nazis have had their way. Caulerpa
(Killer Algae) possession or sale is now a misdemeanor. (in fact in the
entire State of California, per AB 1334 this genus is exclusively
banned). Yet another reason to seize your property, control you. Where
is the logic in this new law? Might it get loose, grow to the exclusion
of other near-shore species? Out compete native forms? What about the
tens, make that hundreds of thousands of acres of non-indigenous trees
of the genus Eucalyptus or Avocados in the State? The impact of the
companion animals that are domesticated cats and dogs... many orders of
magnitude more important than aquarium algae getting loose in the wilds
here (even throwing in Hydrilla verticillata IMO). Where does this
banning end? With the public rising up, compelling their public
employees that they're not going to "pay" for it. The reality is of
course that letting anything into a foreign environment where it
can/will proliferate is contraindicated, a bad idea, practice... as is
covering many square miles of land surface area with asphalt, concrete
for roads, buildings, digging up the land for refuse "disposal", having
billions of people on this small planet... Will you freeze and
dispose of your Caulerpa and whatever else you're "told to" by your "New
Romans", civil servants? Where will you stop abiding by hypocrisies? See
you in jail. Bob Fenner Re: Got Caulerpa? You're a criminal.
ok, so excuse my ignorance... but is this algae something that is
commonly used in aquariums? <Yes... the family Caulerpaceae are
probably in about half of marine aquariums in the U.S. and the world>
something that's useful/helpful in aquariums? I think I've heard some
of the news of why it's supposed to be bad... but what's the downside
of not having it around? <Apparently a threat to near shore
environments... there was an "incident" this last year of half an acre
of the Batiquitos lagoon being vapaamed to eradicate a population>
(I'm not supporting the new law, far from it - just don't know what the
stuff is) Thanks, Hindlick <Hoping to make more sense... than
usual. Bob F/Dogfish> Re: Got Caulerpa? You're a criminal.
Thanks for the email Bob. Hey I have three tanks in my house and a
goldfish pot outside, and it seems like I have huge amounts of algae.
This brings up a few questions which you might be able to answer: 1.
What does Caulerpa look like? <You're under arrest> 2. Is it
possible that I am harboring it without knowing it? <Come out with
your net up> 3. I regularly harvest excess algae from my tanks and
throw it away. Is it possible that I am the source of the contamination?
<We must euthanize you> 4. If so, should I turn myself in? And, do
you know any lawyers that are algae experts? <They've been sent to
the ovens> 5. If not, should algae go in the yard waste recycling?
Those recycling guys seem pretty picky sometimes. <They were
insubordinate and have been eliminated> Feeling Guilty, <We're
coming for you. Stay in your home> Jeff Hulett <The new eco-Nazis>
Re: Got Caulerpa? You're a criminal.
http://www.reefsource.com/Caulerpaban.htm <Thank you for this Mary...
will add your post/input to our sites. Bob F> Re: Got Caulerpa?
You're a criminal. Glad it's of some use- it's kinda old news at
this point, but it's always interesting to go back and see how the whole
thing progressed. <Yes... or regressed as the case may be> Please
don't forget to add the "Job Opportunity" that I sent to you to the
quatic Business section. I saw it in the Daily FAQ section yesterday-
thanks for that. Help me find a salesperson and I'll have more time to
"fight the good fight" with you! <Have added, moved to that part of
the Business Index of WWM> Now get off the computer and take your
wife somewhere nice...it's Saturday night, man!! <Now Sunday... sigh.
Be chatting Mary. Bob F> Mary Re: Got Caulerpa? You're a
criminal. Bob, Glad to see you like spending up to $4 million
on the eradication effort (that was one number mentioned at the Caulerpa
conference last week in San Diego). They are getting worried that it may
not be quite contained (meaning it may have already spread beyond the
two small areas and may want to close off some larger areas and nuke
them) and are running out of money. <The arrogance of folks at the
public trough> Regarding the laws, San Diego bans all Caulerpa while
the state law only bans 9 species (PIJAC was able to get that small
concession). <Yes. Mary has made this clearer to me...> Dr. Susan
Williams, the top scientist they are talking to, would still like the
whole genus and some others as well! Don't be surprised to see new
legislation next year in spite of no scientific evidence that the other
species are invasive or capable of surviving in cool Calif. waters.
<I say ban civil servants... they're the biggest source of pollution>
One interesting point was as they kill of seagrass beds to get at the
Caulerpa, because seagrass beds are protected, they may be obligated to
do replantings and/or mitigation for lost wetlands! By the way the
company that is handling the eradication efforts was planting seagrass
at the time the Caulerpa was found. I think they have run up in the $1
million range or more so far. <I wonder who "planted" the
Caulerpa... I'm still wondering who murdered those folks in New York...>
(When they found it in New South Wales they spent about $55,000 Aus.
before giving up). So this company may actually be paid to cover and
chlorinate large areas of seagrasses and then may get paid to replant
them! I sent a note to a local woman politician who was at the
meeting and gave a short talk and will attach it for your info along
with a summary to Dr. Jaubert who has done most of the work showing it
is not a problem.. I plan to keep active in this debate and if you hear
of local initiatives that need some technical rebuttals let me know.
By they way Bob, have you been to Fiji lately? <Last month in
Taveuni> One of these days I would like to get back down there (after
Micronesia). Regards, Tom <Anytime my friend. Make it known
when you have time. Australia next month. Bob Fenner> Re: Got
Caulerpa? You're a criminal. Does the new law address cruise ship
bilge pumping? <No... the hypocrisy of folks who "barely know" and
don't care. Bob F> Re: Got Caulerpa? You're a criminal.
Bob, Hasn't this genus gone feral already in Huntington Beach Lagoon,
costing taxpayers lots of money? <um, no... a small patch of no
consequence here in San Diego the only incident as far as I'm aware>
Why keep something that causes problems? <Human nature... just that
we enjoy diversity, beauty> there are plenty of other species to keep
instead. Here in Australia there are many species that cause problems
and almost everyone recognizes the need to stop propagation of those
species that cause problems. What if you wanted to keep zebra mussels in
your tank? Or African clawed frogs? <Amen... don't keep these,
endorse their captive use... or releasing ANYTHING to the wild. Bob
Fenner> Good luck with everything, Mike Sweet, Brisbane Australia
<There next month en-route to points northward> Greenery for
marine system Hello there, I have a long-horned cowfish in a
75-gallon tank, and I'm looking for something to "spice-up" the tank.
Since I cannot keep polyps or coral, I was considering planting some sea
grass. What are your thoughts on this? Where can I find sea grass? What
is the scientific name of the most commonly encountered type? Thanks!
<I would get some Caulerpa. It is not a true plant, but a macroalgae.
Sea grasses require deep sand beds over 6" and are considerably more
delicate to ship and get to root. Take a look here for more info
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/caulerpaalg.htm -Steven Pro> Sam
Macro Algae Questions <<JasonC here filling in for Bob while he's
out on a diving junket>> Hi Bob, A report about the Caulerpa Algae.
It has made my tank look great not because of the plants appearance but
the clarity of the water. I used to have a brownish film on the surface
of my water but the Caulerpa took care of that. <<good stuff>> It seems
to grow rapidly so trimming frequently is a must. Is it a good idea to
put Caulerpa in a hospital tank (without using any chemical treatments)?
<<probably wouldn't hurt>> Thanks <<you are quite welcome. Cheers,
J -- >> Following up on the Caulerpa issue... Added some
Caulerpa on Monday, doesn't seem to be doing very well. Does this
excrete toxins as it dies? <<very much so... I can't stand using
Caulerpa in garden reef aquaria... many complications (inhibiting growth
of stonies, discolorants into water, antibiotic properties...just awful
and unnatural for scleractinian reef displays>> The only reason I
added the Caulerpa was at the suggestion of you guys! (I guess not you
personally, Anthony, it must have been another of the crew!) Is there
another kind of macroalgae that does better and is less problematic?
<I like calcareous alga better like Halimeda as well as seagrasses in
larger displays but none should be relied upon for the amount of nitrate
control that most aquarists need. For that we have better protein
skimmers/skimming, water changes and careful feeding/stocking> I need
something that consumes nitrates and don't have a sump so a refugium is
not much of an option until I get another tank. Tracy Creek <keep in
mind, Tracy, that there are merits and disadvantages to all
things...especially in aquariology. We here at WWM are sharing advice
(free) on very general or vague questions based on what serves the
masses (the greater good). My advice specifically made a reference to
Caulerpa with stonies (scleractinian coral) and even then is merely one
man's opinion. We have no idea what you tank has or what you intend to
do with it. As such, for many fish only aquariums and systems dominated
by soft coral, Caulerpa may be an excellent choice even by my admission.
Do try to understand that we are trying to help you as best we can based
on inferences and the limited information we receive. There is no one
single blueprint for a successful marine aquarium... just ingredients
and varying degrees of success in the many wonderful combinations that
aquarists mix them in. Kindly, Anthony> Question about Caulerpa
taxifolia To whom it may concern at WWM, <Hello> I have
been doing much research on the noxious seaweed type called C.
taxifolia. From what I read, this marine plant is deadly to all other
marine life because of it's toxic properties. <Umm, no... not a
marine plant, not that toxic under most circumstances> I noticed in
many WWM FAQ articles this Caulerpa, being the one of choice for many
reasons, and is also what Bob Fenner recommends highly for nitrate
removal & refugium sumps. I was planning on keeping some in just my sump
for nitrate reduction but I am concerned about small parts making their
way to my main tank from the pumps. I have read that small particles of
the plant can fragment off, (smaller than what you can see) regrow into
new plans quite quickly. I guess my only concern is the 'toxic' nature
and it's affect on my many fish (tangs and angels). Does this Caulerpa
excrete toxins in to the water column or is it only toxic in the way of
the fish consuming it directly? <Not toxic to ingest... can toxify a
system if allowed to become predominant, or switches into a reproductive
phase... can be controlled by regular (weekly or so) trimmings/pinching>
I'd hate to wake up and see my favorite Hippo Tang 'toxify' & dead from
this little helper plant. Friend or Foe, is it ok for fish? <More a
friend. Please read/study on. Bob Fenner> Caulerpas
Howdy bob! Wanted some info regarding harvesting Caulerpas from local
water sources. <don't do it... never try to acclimate temperate
species to tropical aquaria please> I live in Virginia, right on the
Atlantic. Whenever I go to the beach, I sea all this seaweed on the
shore. After checking the water, it is rather abundant close to the
shore line. The local laws don't prohibit it's collection as long as
it's not for sale. Is this safe to place in my 75 gal. Marine setup?
<it would have to be chilled likely and endemic (only coastal species)>
Most of it is attached to small rocks with brine shrimp (I think)
swimming in it. <hmmm... not brine. Mysid perhaps.. not a brackish
brine shrimp though> Before I add anything like this, I wanted to
check on the reality of it. Would I harm my tank? <beyond
incompatibility issues (temperature) there is a very serious concern of
introducing parasites pests and disease. If you must, please quarantine
any collected/new livestock for 4 weeks minimum> Current occupants
are, 2 damsels, 2 Clarkii clowns, a sebae anemone, lawnmower blenny,
starfish, hermit crabs and turbo snails. Thanks, Kathy <kindly,
Anthony> Hair Algae I have a 300 gal reef with 0
nitrates since adding an additional skimmer since ETS-800 is not big
enough. My problem is I let some hair algae overtake the tank. I am
using RO/DI water and I tested phosphate level and it wasn't bad, but I
added Seachem remover. I purchased 200 hermit crabs and they haven't put
a dent in it or can't keep up with it. I don't feed the fish at all. I
only add Seachem iodine and strontium. Calcium is per Knop reactor. What
advantage would Caulerpa in sump with reverse lighting help? <This
could very well help your situation. Caulerpa would compete with the
hair algae for available nutrients. At the very least, it would add a
source of planktonic life/food to your reef tank.> I have 75 gal
sump. Corals and fish look great otherwise. Should I try more crabs?
<Not a fan of hermit crabs.> I am at my nerve endings! I pull out 2
cups of algae a week by hand. PLEASE HELP! <Try the refugium and
review the extensive writings on WWM regarding algae control. -Steven
Pro> Caulerpa again Hey Gang, I hope you are all having
a great summer in between all the help you provide. <thanks and the
same to you in kind, my friend> I just finished hooking up my
refugium and stocked it with mexicana, raceuros and serrulata algae
based on what was available at the LFS and info I read here. <yes...
Bob is a proponent of it in small quantities (he is specific about this
in verse and presentation)> I set the refugium up to both feed my
corals and a future Mandarin Goby (I have a 125gal with 120lbs of live
sand and over 100lbs of live rock in the main and 20lbs sand and 5lbs
live rock in the refugium). The refugium is lighted 24/7 <this RDP
method is nice for pH stability> and is directly fed from the main
tank and then to the sump, <again excellent to get raw water to the
refugium for nutrient scrubbing> so it does get lots of "stuff" from
the main tank. Today I have read the daily faq's and in 2 of your
answers you now say not to use the Caulerpa algae. <not exactly,
please recall that I recommend not using Caulerpa primarily if your goal
is coral growth. There are many other less serious disadvantages to it
and of course some benefits too. IMO, far fewer benefits though> I am
confused more now than ever. What is my best coarse of action, remove
the Caulerpas and use something else (what?) or continue with the
Caulerpa. <it depends on the demands you have for the refugium. If
you like the look of plants, have a high bio-load of fishes (read: safe
oversupply of nutrients without fear of Caulerpa going vegetative), will
harvest the Caulerpa like clockwork and are willing to keep it at the
slight expense of some coral growth/vigor... then keep it. If you are
looking for maximum zooplankton culture or coral growth, then there are
much better refugium styles (fishless rubble zones for 'pod culture, or
seagrasses for epiphytic material)> Also if you could provide a short
explanation of why the Caulerpa is so bad. <excerpted from a recent
reply, "The short story is that there are far more disadvantages than
advantages. Yes it grows fast and yes it is a large nutrient exporter
for it. However, for those same reasons is a very strong competitor with
corals for the same nutrients. Furthermore, they exude noxious compounds
that slow the potential growth of many corals (read: slows, not stops).
They are tedious to maintain without breaching critical mass for fear of
a vegetative event which is inevitable and potentially catastrophic in
many systems. The list goes on. There are much better macros out there.
Caulerpa is popular because it was commercially marketed, not because it
is the best choice. See how many corals you can find in Caulerpa zones
on wild shores (zero or nearly so... there must be a reason, In small
quantities Caulerpa causes little harm... but doesn't help much
either."> Thanks to the entire WWM crew for all the selfless help you
provide. <best regards, Anthony> ? on green and red algae
Hello Mr. Fenner, Thanks for the reply and input. It looks like there
is some red coral algae starting. I am taking note of what you said
about getting a better protein skimmer. <Ah, good to hear, read on
both counts> I have been reading and researching different ones. What
is your opinion of a good system? I would like to get a system that
hangs on the back and is quiet. <Quite a few choices here> After
reading more on what you wrote on macro algae and Caulerpa, I am
planning on adding some Caulerpa to my system. Is this still a good idea
or will it over-run the tank? <No worries... Should you grow a bumper
crop, it's easy to remove, cull... feed, make available to others>
Thanks again for your thoughts and again your books have been a great
source of information. Dave <A pleasure to be of help. Bob Fenner>
What Caulerpa? I just sent you a question regarding the addition
of macro-algae into a sump/refugium... you replied: If so, where
should this macro algae go? Into a sump/refugium? <And in your main
system... yes, where your livestock will eat a good part of it> Some
species of Caulerpa is stated to grow and take over the system. Which
species to you recommend? <There are many... as you likely know (see
Baensch Marine Atlas v.1 here), but Caulerpa taxifolia (the species "on
the run" in the Mediterranean and California in places) and C.
sertularoides are my faves... do what you want them to physiologically,
look good, readily available... All this on the genus/family posted on
our site: www.WetWebMedia.com> How much in the main tank of 55
gallons? I'm assuming you'd suggest that I get as much as I can
squeeze into the refugium. <Hmm, sold by "the bunch" or "a clump" or
"rock"... a couple of these units is about right. Bob Fenner>
Too much Caulerpa and R/O maintenance Dear Bob, It's Howard
again celebrating a year of the joy of reef keeping. As usual I have
couple of questions as I strive for perfect conditions and perfect
water. Still haven't lost a fish. <Ah! Good for you.> How does one
know when a R/O unit needs servicing (as everything else in a system
does)? Mine has been in use a year and has probably processed 1000
gallons or so. There is plenty of flow, I'm just wondering if it is
getting all the bad stuff out. I don't think my testing ability shows
the small concentrations that might cause trouble. <Good question.
Most folks I bet just taste a difference in the produced water... or
figure it's time. But there are simple water quality tests, like
conductivity (some water softening, reverse osmosis units come with a
light bulb arrangement... with the light "coming on" as the amount of
charged particles in the water passing between its electrodes
increases)... You can test for total dissolved solids and more as
well...> Is it possible to have too much Caulerpa in a refugium?
<Yes... as in when it blocks the light too much for the material below
it, or impedes water flow... or removes/bioaccumulates too much nutrient
you want to go to livestock photosynthates...> I flow about 200
gallons per hour directly from the show tank to the refugium. The 20
gallon refugium is now totally packed with plant growth and producing
lots of amphipods. I figure the more I have the more nutrients will be
removed and the more oxygen will be produced. is that right? Or is there
a down side to too much? <If you see too much dying below, remove
some of the Caulerpa...> God bless America Howard <Be chatting
my friend. Bob Fenner> Caulerpa Algae Hi Bob I had a
question about Caulerpa Algae. I have an Eco System and I need to have
the Caulerpa Algae to give me the optimum output. My problem is I cannot
find anybody (LFS) that has it. Is there a website that I could order
the Caulerpa and hopefully be able to use it without it dieing before
getting to my house. Thanks, DG <Would check around, LFS, marine
clubs for a local source. Otherwise, hit the livestock etailers. Many of
them listed on the WWM links pages. Bob Fenner> Caulerpa
Bob, Are you aware of any company that I can buy Caulerpa species
macroalgae on-line and who will ship to Canada? Thank-you. John
<Perhaps one of the etailers listed on the WWM Links pages:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/links.htm Bob Fenner> Re: Tank
Expansion OK, now I'm totally confused! You said not to add
Caulerpa? <as aquarists we all have different perspectives... have
you followed the FAQ dailies for the last week (peak if not). It is not
a matter of plants good or bad... it is a matter of your goals. Massive
amounts of Caulerpa cause far more harm than good if your goal is to
grow coral. However, if you overfeed or have large fishes... nutrient
export is more valuable than coral growth. The story goes on as you can
imagine... never think in absolutes, my friend> from what I have read
in the refugium pages I thought Caulerpa refugiums were the answer to
all our aquarium problems? <heehee... that is an absolute, but not
always accurate, statement ;)> I have Caulerpa prolifera in my reef
system now, should I change to Syringodium Manatee Seagrass and/or
turtle grass, or stay with what I have? <likely stay with what you
got if it is not excessive (2-5 gallon tank full versus 10+ gallons)>
Other than the Caulerpa going sexual what are the other disadvantages of
Caulerpa refugiums? <antibiotic properties shed into the water that
concentrate and impact coral and other invert health, noxious compounds
secreted at/by the holdfasts to dissolve organic matter causing like
duress, significant yellowing agents (far more than most other
plants/alga) that reduce light transmission to coral, etc and require
above average chemical filtration and protein skimming, and the list
goes on> What are the advantages? (I have read the refugium FAQ,
everything there is positive) <one main advantage: fast growth that
can be harnessed as a nutrient export mechanism. Again... if you have a
very heavy bio-load in the tank then this is helpful> What are the
advantages of the seagrass refugium? <no vegetative state, no
burning secretions from holdfasts, more epiphytic matter produced that
serve as food for corals, significantly less yellowing and noxious
agents in the water against coral> What are the disadvantages?
<very slow growth (can be an advantage too as they don't compete with
your corals as severely for nutrients too), a poor nutrient export
mechanism until the tank matures> My tank is only 2 month old so it
would not be hard to switch to something else. But not to sure what to
switch to now. <depends on your needs as above> One last
question, I have an AMiracle PS-4 protein skimmer attached to my 29
sump. Is this enough skimmer until I get my other tanks installed or
should a new skimmer be one of my first purchases? < a great skimmer
or two on a system is critical. If your skimmer does not put out a cup
of dark skimmate at least daily and you are growing Caulerpa then I am
scared in the long run for you... heehee. Do upgrade soon.> It is a
counter current skimmer with a 50-100 gph flow rate. <very modest
IMO. Best regards, Anthony>
|
|