
|
|
FAQs About Water Changes for Marine Systems: Automation
Related Articles: Marine Water Change,
The “Perfect” Water Change Regimen? by Scott Fellman,
Water Changes, Exchanges by Anthony Calfo,
Captive Seawater Quality,
General Marine Maintenance,
Related FAQs: Water Changes for Marine
Systems 1, Water Changes for Marine
Systems 2, Water Changes 3,
Water Changes 4, & FAQs on Water Changes:
Rationale, Gear/Tools,
Frequency/Amount, Techniques, Trouble/shooting,
& Water Top-Off Systems,
Evaporation/Water Make-Up, Treating
Tapwater, Marine
Water Quality, Marine Plumbing, |
MD.JPG) |
Make up water for my aquarium
Automated Water Changes 6/30/09
I have a 300gal tank and a 75gal wet dry I want to have a auto make up
water for my system could you tell me how.
<This can be done, but is a fairly complex DIY project to make safe and
reliable. You first of course will need a tank or vessel to hold the
makeup water. Then you will need a couple of pumps, plumbing between the
tank and this holding tank, plumbing coming out of the tank to wherever
you want your wastewater to go, and a few timers. The first timer will
need to shut off your sump return pump. The second will start up at this
time and pump the water out of the sump. How much water should be
determined by where the pump inlet is at, not how long the timer runs
the pump for. Now the timer running the pump in your holding tank can
come on to start pumping in the new water. Ideally this amount of water
too should be regulated by the pump inlet in relation to the amount of
water in the tank.
Another route or failsafe that you can add in here are electronic float
valves to shut these pumps off at the appropriate levels. Now, between
the two tanks you will need a siphon break so one tank does not siphon
back into the other at some point. As for automating mixing the salt, I
just wouldn't. The easiest is to get a salinity meter and just add a
little salt at a time with a powerhead circulating the holding tank. I
believe in
and use a refractometer myself. It is a bit more work, but I do feel it
is much more reliably accurate. With all of this being said, I have had
such systems on my tanks in the past. Now I just opt for all of the
above
manually run with ball valves by me, there is still no hauling water. I
just don't trust timers and float switches to never fail! Scott V.>
Oh, one more thing to add. If you have
an ATO system it will of course need to be shut off during the whole
process. Scott V.
Automated water changes for mini-reef
Hello, and thanks for the great website and instructive information.
<thanks kindly... please keep reading, learning and sharing> I'm
interested in attempting the following experiment: to maintain a 180
gal. community mini-reef system with automated water changes from the
regeneration (the rinse water that cleanses the ion-exchange resin
bed) from my household water softener. <I see some likely problems
already if your household softener uses potassium or sodium chloride to
recharge: imparting chlorides which skew alkalinity in the aquarium for
post treated water... OR...(your case) the impart of hardened "purged
water" which has mostly useful hard water elements (exchanged for
chloride by the softener) BUT(!) also has un-exchanged sodium chloride.
This unregulated NaCl allowed into your aquarium without the other
balanced minerals and trace elements of seawater will naturally effect
your SG but without the other necessary elements. In simpler terms...
you can add enough NaCl table salt to a glass of water that gives you a
desired reading for marine life, but without the trace elements...
marine life will die in this salted water even though the hydrometer
says differently> We use a 38,000 grain "on demand" water softener
(using sodium chloride) <Houston we have a problem...> and a RO
system. (THE RO brine is used for another application -- a humidifying
water fountain). The hardness of our municipal tap water is approx. 16
grains. It is chlorinated, but has low (undetectable) total dissolved
solid, phosphate, copper and iron content. Each regeneration uses approx
35 gallons, and regenerates approx. every 5 days. Approximately 3lbs of
salt is used for each regeneration: <Ughh> The water chemistry of
this "brine" consists mostly of sodium chloride, calcium and magnesium.
<Oh, ya!> I have 2 pH readings, 8.1 and 8.2 I'd like to have this
water run through some activated carbon and a specified amount of
additional synthetic sea salt -- before it hits the sump. <sorry...
how do you reckon the incidental plain salt carried in? Even if you
could easily measure it, do you really want to get into making your own
synthetic trace element slurry to dose and temper the stray plain NaCl?>
The tank would be appropriately fitted for overflow drainage. <way
too complicated here, bud. Your best bet would be to get a separate
(small is OK) 2-column de-ionizer and completely demineralize this water
if your goal is saving water. The high pH of this effluent that will be
lost through the DI is a small loss and easily/cheaply recovered post
treatment> The issues, as I see it are as follows: 1: Maintaining
the specific gravity of the tank by fine-tuning the requisite additional
salt; (including fiddling with the evaporation rate, by changing the
amt. of uncovered surface area.) <a complete nightmare... complicated
and recommended only if you enjoy the challenge and are a chemist> 2:
Accounting for an accelerated removal of trace elements (strontium,
etc.). <accelerated? They were never there in the first place. Not
sure we are on the same page here. I am talking about you reckoning the
sodium chloride that you are bringing in with this rinse water but
without the slurry of balanced trace elements to make SW> Before I
reinvent the wheel, do you have any information about other attempts in
this area? <no one bothers when time and expense are issues. This
would have to be a personal challenge for you, because there is no
practical reason otherwise for doing it. The irony is that your tap
water through carbon is probably the best water could you have in the
house for a marine tank. Reconstituting pure DI water is probably
second.> Are there any flies in the ointment I'm missing? <a whole
swamp full of flies, brother!> Other considerations? <this really
all boils down to not bringing plain salt into the make up water or
being a brilliant chemist with a lab to check the daily/weekly variances
and compensate for them with your own home-made synthetic sea salt mix>
-- e.g. are there some reef species that would be more tolerant to this?
<cruel and unnatural to do so... doesn't happen in the wild> Species
to avoid? <Ha!... All<G>> Are there other automations to help
minimize other tank maintenance, <I can forward you a chapter from my
book about setting up automatic water changes with solenoids> such as
substrate maintenance? <thin substrate, strong water movement and
active sand sifting animals> What other issues should I consider?
<hmmm... I'd suggest that you try treating this more like a hobby
instead of a science, my friend :) ... unless you truly enjoy the
science more than the organic living components (our fishes and
corals!)> Thanks!-Frank Pagoda BTW: I plan to keep a journal on this
project & publish my results to help others who may be curious about
this operation. <indeed, that would be excellent at any rate. Kind
regards, Anthony> Automated water changes for mini-reef
Whew! I haven't been sobered up that aggressively since college
mid-terms! <Ha! With a college flashback like that, did you also
suddenly get the munchies too? And for lack of a beer at hand, chug your
scalding hot coffee chanting "Go. go...go...go...GOOOOOO!" in your head?
Just checking?> Your sense of humor and gracious style, Anthony, is
why when you ring in folks like me (and you sure did) we laugh
along....good job! And thanks for the good feedback. <Wow... thanks
kindly :) But I was really just taking the long way around the barn for
calling you a sadist with mad scientist tendencies. I'll take the credit
just the same <G>. Heehee...> Your reasonable protestations aside,
let's assume I (pigheadedly!) go through with this experiment. <OK>
Should I seek out a SW product that is markedly higher in balanced trace
elements than others? <that depends on how involved you want to get
here. If the science of it isn't appeal in the purist form... and you
just simply want to make it work: my advice would be to simply purchase
the semi-solid synthetic sea salt concentrates they make for the big
commercial operations (actually quite economical... but you must mix
every time EXTREMELY well or make whole batches (400gall) at a time).
These SW slurries have everything in it you need except plain salt.
Then... you will only have to calculate the influx of sodium chloride
with the source water and supplement proportionately> Is there a
trace element compound available without sodium chloride? <yep...
most of the big manufacturers make it. Best to seek an aquaculture
supply house for this. Fritz used to make such a product for public
aquariums and shrimp/food fish farmers.. perhaps still do?> Maybe the
trace element/SW slurry (including the correct amount of salt to balance
the brine) could be set below the activated charcoal/carbon, ready to be
washed into the tank with the regenerated water. What other suggestions
do you have to make this work? <Jack Daniels... by the gallon> I
know using that automating a system with inferior water is complicated,
ultimately may not work, and is repugnant to many. But the allure of
utilizing water that is so close to ideal, and is generated a mere 5
feet away from the tank, and can lop off a HUGE chunk of time, and is an
intriguing alternative to the conventional way -- is all too enticing
for me. <some merit to it, some extra complications too. The high pH
and high mineral content are easily provided/supplemented and cheaply
too otherwise. You may find that using this water is not time saving at
all, and simply resort to carbon filtered tap water> BTW, I will NOT
jeopardize any marine wildlife with this Dr. Demento contraption.
<understood my friend> Live rock will be added only when I can easily
maintain the correct SW chemistry. Finally, I agree with your
suggestion that I treat this more as a hobby than as a science. That's
what I'm doing! Rather than anally adhering to scientific rules set in
stone, I'm trying a different path to the same destination. <you're a
heroin addict, aren't you? Ahem,... I mean... "Why yes, I concur
wholeheartedly with your reason and rationale for embracing the science
of aquariology without becoming enslaved to it." Errrh... or something
like that <G>> From where I sit, my friend, that's the approach that
makes mini-reefkeeping a hobby. Thanks again, and do let me know your
additional input to this unconventional approach to make and maintain
safe sea water. With great appreciation, Frank <best regards in this
endeavor... we'll watch for you on the news. :) Anthony>
Plumbing for water changes I am plumbing a new tank with a sump.
I was wondering what would be the easiest way to set it up to do water
changes. Can I add a T with a ball valve off the return line so I can
just open the ball valve and let water go into a bucket and shut it off
when finished? <Turn the pump off and get the water from the back
siphon> Then I would just add water back into the sump. I should be
able to do this without turning off any power and not effect anything (I
think). <Maybe...> I will be changing about 2gal a week. <Great
sketch! Let me state that I personally don't use a water change device
of this nature. However, I did research this type of idea when I set up
my tank. I assume that you are planning on using flexible PVC for your
lines. It would certainly be the easiest material to manipulate. My
concern for your proposal is the pressure that the water will be under
as it is leaving the return line and entering the bucket. You will be
drawing water very close from the return pump and this water may splash
around and spray a lot more than you want. Since I don't know how large
your return pump is it's hard to make an accurate estimate of the
pressure involved. If the pump only moves a couple of hundred gallons or
so, you may be fine. If the pump is large say over 300 or 400GPH the
pressure may be strong. I don't know for sure the repercussions but the
above statements are my initial assessment. Consider this: I assume your
return line is releasing water in the main tank under the tank water
level. As an option you could plumb the tank exactly the way that you
have planned...If the pressure is too great, you can always shut off
your return pump and let the back siphon water flow through your "T" and
into the bucket! From your drawing it looks like this "T" is also a
shutoff valve which is exactly what you will need. If your pump is
submersible realize it may heat up your water. Be sure to plumb shutoff
valves after your pump so that it may be removed entirely from the
system if the need arises. If your pump is external you need shutoffs
before and after the pump. Lastly, Prizm skimmers have a poor reputation
among hobbyists. Complaints include too much noise and inefficiency.
David Dowless> Shaun Nelson Plumbing for water changes
Thanks for the info. Yes I am using flexible pvc from the pump to the T.
I will be using a MAG 7 for the return. I thought with a ball valve I
would be able to regulate the water going into the bucket? <That is
plausible. Should work okay> Anyway I will do like you said and try
it with the pump on and off. And yes the Prizm Sucks, I already bought
it. <Sell it on EBay! David Dowless> Can you make a
recommendation on the automatic top off? Right now my R/O unit
goes to a 80 gallon reservoir which I will use for my premix. I was
thinking of teeing off the existing supply to the 80-gallon reservoir to
the sump and controlling the flow with a Kent marine float valve. In
other words, the R/O unit would feed both the 80-gallon reservoir and
another line directly to the sump. Kent marine, however, does not
recommend having a float valve in the sump connected directly to the R/O
unit. for some reason this is bad for the solenoid, since the constant
evaporation from the sump will keep the R/O unit working constantly or
at least turning the solenoid on and off constantly. The
recommendation was to get yet another reservoir to which I would
periodically pump water from the existing 80-gallon reservoir. This
second reservoir would be solely for fresh water and would gravity feed
the sump and be controlled by a float valve. This second reservoir
would have to be refilled every week or so, so the automatic top-off
would not be fully automatic, just automated during the week. Any
thoughts on this would be appreciated. <There are two ways to do this
depending on your system. The above system allows you to buffer your
top-off water as needed, but is less automated. The opposite idea works
as well, automated with dosing pumps, calcium reactors, etc. You need
two containers as above. The main reservoir is fed by the RO unit
controlled by the Kent float. The pre-mix container should be the
container that is periodically filled when needed, not the top-off. The
top-off system can then be run with a small pump in the main reservoir,
controlled by a solenoid in the sump (either DIY or one of the
commercially available units) which refills the sump automatically.
Check out marine set-ups at WetWebMedia.com Craig> Re:
automatic top-off Two perceived advantages of not using the main
reservoir as the automatic top off: (1) The R/O unit isn't running
all the time from the constant dribble replacing evaporation from the
sump; <This is a non-issue, RO's that feed drinking water tanks
have the same intervals/use. It will run as long as required to fill
the reservoir, regardless.> (2) in the event of malfunction, only a
limited amount of fresh water gets dumped in the tank. <This is a
good reason to go with the gravity fed top-off of limited volume, only
so much water can be accidentally added to the system.> What the
perceived advantages of what you propose? Solely automation? The task
of refilling the automatic top off seems hardly burdensome. It's a flip
of the switch. <I got the feeling you were concerned with automation,
if not, I would go with what works best, is safest for you and your
inhabitants. Enjoy! Craig> Cleaning The Substrate Hello
<Hi there- Scott F. with you today!> I have dug around in your FAQ's
for a while now and haven't found exactly what I'm looking for so sorry
to bother you. My situation is this I have a new FOWLR w/4" SB and am
thinking ahead in my setup in order to try and make my monthly water
changes go a little smoother. I am planning of setting up a "permanent"
section of tubing that will run from the bottom, left, rear corner of my
tank to underneath my tank. I then plan on putting a valve or even
better yet one of the valves from a 350 magnum on there to shut on and
off the water flow so my water changes will take minutes!
<Innovative...an interesting idea...certainly can work... Now I plan
to have a goby or other sand dweller in there as well as numerous Turbo
Grazers. Now for the question: Is it absolutely necessary and vital to
vacuum the upper 1/2" of my substrate during my monthly water changes?
<Really a subjective thing...I do not consider it mandatory...> Thanx
again. Kevin Conner <And thank you, Kevin- for stopping by. Good
luck! Regards, Scott F> Cleaning The Substrate (Pt.2)
"Innovative...an interesting idea...certainly can work..." wait till
you see what I plan to do with this Prizm protein skimmers collection
cup ;) <Now, if you can just figure out away to keep mustard squeeze
bottles from clogging, you may be up for a Nobel prize! Regards, Scott
F> - Water Changes - <Greetings, JasonC here...> I
came up with what seems to be a great idea for water changes although
I'm sure you will tell me that someone else has already thought of it.
<Maybe so, maybe not...> Please let me know if you can see any potential
problems with this idea. This is my first reef aquarium. The tank is
165 gallons and I've got a total sump capacity of 50 gallons. There is a
small space behind the tank (4'X4'X4') and I thought I would stack two
25 gallon tanks there. The bottom tank would be for drain water (I have
no way to plumb to a drain directly) and the top tank would hold fresh
saltwater. I've figured my maximum water level in the sump to be 9" in
order to accommodate the extra 15 gallons from the tank that I
calculated would get there in the event of a power failure. <The word
'calculate' makes me very nervous here... I would do a wet run with
freshwater as part of the leak-check process and make sure these
'calculations' bear out.> I was then going to install a small bulkhead
in the sump at 9" and plumb it to the drainage tank. The top tank would
gravity fresh saltwater back to the sump. <I'm guessing here that you
will have valves between the two auxiliary tanks and the sump so that
you will determine when it's time to start the drain process and
refill...> I figure as long as the bottom tank is empty when the top
tank is full and if the top tank never holds more than what the bottom
tank will hold at the 9" level, I am not really asking the sump to hold
any additional volume. The only weakness I see is if the drain line gets
plugged, but I suppose I could size it to minimize that potential and
add a float switch to stop the fresh saltwater flow if the sump level is
too high. My goal would be to balance the flow of fresh saltwater to the
point where I would need a refill once a week, about a 20 gallon water
change. <Well.. I'm not sure 9" of water in a 25 gallon tank is going to
net you a 20 gallon change - probably more like 10 gallons - you should
measure this to be certain. Likewise, with the fitting at 9" between the
sump and drain tank, you will not get more water than this [9"]into the
drain tank without a pump. Also... if I read this correctly, you want to
continually drain some amount of water into the drain tank and replace
the water from the sump [at a constant rate] from the fill tank? Is that
right? This makes me nervous for a couple of reasons, but mostly because
it's very hard to match flow rates - very easy to over-fill or
under-fill the sump and perhaps have a pump run dry. Also... if my
reading of your description is correct, wouldn't you also stand to have
some of the fresh mix-water going into the drain tank? I'd think you'd
want to avoid that.> At that time, I would suck out the bottom tank and
refill the top. Is the above method really any better than just doing
a 20 gallon change all at once every week? <Well... I can see why you
would want to lessen the labor, but I think you may have to end up
hauling buckets.> Is there a reliable type of metering valve to
control such a small flow? <I don't know of any that would hold up to
use in saltwater - best to use ball valves although they don't meter as
well as others.> How would you maintain SG? Mix the fresh saltwater
at a slighter lower SG to balance evaporation or just test and add fresh
RO water as needed? <No, typically top off water should be water without
salts - the salt in your tank doesn't evaporate so that any addition of
water with salt in it will increase your salinity.> Assuming 85*F as
a maximum ambient temperature during the summer, what does a typical
reef aquarium this size with metal halides lose to evaporation in a
week? Gallons? Tens of gallons? <In a week? My guess is tens of gallons
- I used to put about two gallons of freshwater in my 180 a day.>
Thanks, George Nikolich <Cheers, J -- > Auto top-off RO
water in reef tank If you use raw RO water for auto top off what
should be added. I do not used Kalk. -RGibson <Well, Kalkwasser would
be nice. Other than that, the water should be aerated and buffered.
-Steven Pro> The Automatic Aquarium Water Changer Hi
there, I am emailing from the UK. I have seen The Automatic Aquarium
Water Changer in several books, and also on the internet. I have asked
about this equipment in pet stores, but not been able to find it. Do you
know if there as a seller of this in the UK? <You might try the folks
at TMC: http://www.tmc-ltd.co.uk/ If anyone knows where/if this
product can be procured there they will. Bob Fenner> Regards Keith
Charlton Automated Water Replacement System Hi Robert!
How are you? <Fine> I was wondering if I could get your expert
opinion on this setup. I implemented an automatic drip system for my 72
gallon reef tank. I was hoping through the constant water exchange that
I could maintain pure high level quality water in this environment.
<A good approach> My system is basically set up like this... I
have a 20 gallon tall hex mixing tank under my 75 gallon reef tank that
fills up very slowly (with 1/4" tubing from my RO unit located in the
kitchen). The water fills up to the 10 gallon mark set by a large toilet
like float switch, (Home depot). The large float switch is enclosed in a
plastic tube & clamped to the side of the tank . This tube prevents
water from getting inside the switch and keeps the float mechanism
basically pretty clean of salt free. <Okay> I have a small pump
that is mounted 3 inches down from the high water mark in this mixing
tank. The pump is always on & constantly pushing water pressure through
1/4" inch tubing over to my Wet Dry sump which has a very small float
switch (Polypropylene Valve Body Polypropylene Float -
http://www.mcmaster.com) that is mounted about 1/2 foot down from the
top of the sump. <With you so far> I also have a small powerhead
in the 20 hex that is constantly on and circulating the water all week
long. I try to keep the SG and temperature at the same level with what
is in the tank. Saltwater drips out of the main tank very slowly into a
bucket and new RO saltwater drips in to the sump very slowly (drips in
at approx. 2 gallons per day). I also add one cup of RO water without
salt for evaporation each day. I am hoping that I am getting a true
balance here. <Me too> My question is... Is it ok to utilize a
slow water replacement system like this and how beneficial are it's
affects in overall water quality? Am I disrupting the balance or
chemistry of the water or am I improving the overall balance...
removing nitrates, keeping PH level high? <Very beneficial> Do you
know of anyone who does this? <Most public aquariums, many breeding
facilities> Is it ok for me to do a 5-10% water change each Friday in
additional to the slow water replacement? Really appreciate your
comments. <Sure, but likely unnecessary. BTW, so I can sleep
tonight... have you tried shutting off power to one, all pumps to "see
what happens"? Any overflow fail-safe mechanisms in place? Be chatting.
Bob Fenner> Re: Automated Water Replacement System Yes,
Actually, as long as the float mechanisms in the mixing tank and sump do
not get clogged (left in open position) I am ok. If the power goes off
only a few gallons of water from the main tank will come down into the
sump. Water does not go back into the mixing tank from the sump.
<Mmm, I would still have... an overflow box... curtain of sorts around
the edge... excuses/explanations aplenty on hand...> The RO water
comes in very slowly to the mixing tank and I usually close the valves
once I have the 10 gallons needed for daily water exchange. I then open
the valves once again at the end of the week to fill the mixing tank
once again for weekly water change. <What if you forget?> I would
not leave this operation running for a few days unattended.... <How
about a timer with solenoids then?> actually I have lost a few nights
sleep worrying about it but when I turned off the power I felt a little
better! I should probably check the valves every so often. <Sorry to
be such a "worry wart"... just have had an amazing number of spilled
water mishaps/accidents over the years. Bob Fenner> Re:
Automated Water Replacement System If I do build some kind of
redundancy into this setup and it is fail proof do you know if there is
any kind of market out there for my system? Would you know of people who
would care to set something up like this? It was not that expensive...
just the RO unit. <I do think there is some "build-able" market for
this arrangement... Many water treatment tools in place now... and many
more to come on-line in coming years... Worth investigating,
test-marketing. Bob Fenner> Topping off Hi Bob, When
you top off a tank to replace evaporated water, should you use seawater
with a lower salt concentration? <No... unless you're trying to raise
the spg... just freshwater. Bob Fenner> Tony Re: topping off
That is what I thought but I wanted to be sure. Thank you for the quick
response. <You're welcome my friend. Be chatting. Bob Fenner> Tony
|
|